Home // China

Chinese Fuel Trader Sues Two U.S. Banks Over Blocked Payments Ahead of Sanctions

05/08/2026 // Garrison Vance // Views

Tags: blocked payments, Bubble, business, chaos, China, China Oil and Petroleum Company, Citigroup, corporations, department of the treasury, dollar demise, economics, economy, energy supply, fuel supply, fuel trader, Globalism, HY Energy, Iran, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force, JPMorgan, legal action, market crash, money supply, Office of Foreign Assets Control, outrage, risk, sanctioned entity, sanctions, terrorism

HY Energy, a Chinese fuel trading company, has filed two separate lawsuits in Shanghai and Beijing against JPMorgan and Citigroup, alleging the banks improperly blocked $40 million in payments intended for China Oil and Petroleum Company (COPC) in 2023.

According to court documents, the transfers were initiated months before the U.S. Department of the Treasury designated COPC as a sanctioned entity. The lawsuits claim the banks froze the funds without legal justification at the time, as no sanctions had been imposed on COPC when the payment orders were executed. HY Energy is seeking compensation for financial losses resulting from the blocked transfers, arguing the banks’ actions disrupted its business operations and contractual obligations.

Sanctions Designation and Timeline

The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned COPC in February 2024, stating the company had materially supported Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF). The OFAC described COPC as a front company involved in Iranian oil sales worth hundreds of millions of dollars, according to official statements.

HY Energy contends the payment freeze occurred prior to any sanctions designation, making the banks' decision to withhold funds unjustified. The company argues that the banks acted prematurely and without a clear legal mandate, as COPC was not on any sanctions list at the time the transfers were initiated. The timeline of events is central to the case, with HY Energy maintaining that the banks should have processed the payments in line with standard banking protocols.

Banks' Actions and Plaintiff's Claims

JP Morgan and Citigroup informed HY Energy in May 2024 that the disputed funds had been transferred to OFAC, effectively placing them under U.S. government control. The banks have not publicly commented on the lawsuits, but HY Energy's legal filings assert that the banks should be held liable for the financial losses incurred due to the blocked transfers.

The plaintiff alleges that the banks lacked a legal basis to freeze payments prior to the sanction designation, and that their actions exceeded the scope of U.S. regulatory requirements. HY Energy claims the banks' decision caused significant operational disruptions, including delayed payments to suppliers and reputational damage in the Chinese energy sector.

Escalation of Sanctions and Retaliation

The legal disputes come amid broader U.S.-China tensions over oil trade sanctions. In April 2026, the U.S. Treasury sanctioned Hengli Petrochemical, a major Chinese refiner, over alleged purchases of Iranian oil through shadow fleets ^[1]. China responded by invoking its 2021 Blocking Rules for the first time, ordering entities in China to ignore U.S. sanctions on five domestic refineries ^[2][3].

China's Ministry of Commerce issued a directive on May 2, 2026, instructing companies to comply with Chinese law rather than U.S. extraterritorial sanctions, marking a significant escalation ^[2]. The order protects Hengli Petrochemical and four other refiners that were blacklisted by the U.S. Treasury ^[1]. These developments highlight the growing friction between Washington and Beijing over the enforcement of oil trade restrictions, with legal challenges like HY Energy’s lawsuits representing a new front in the dispute ^[4].

Conclusion

The lawsuits against JP Morgan and Citigroup underscore the complex legal landscape for Chinese firms operating under overlapping U.S. sanctions regimes. As China pushes back against extraterritorial sanctions through its Blocking Rules, the outcome of these cases could set precedents for how banks handle payments involving entities that later become sanctioned. The broader U.S.-China rivalry over Iranian oil trade continues to evolve, with both sides taking increasingly assertive measures.

References

1. China Orders Refiners to Ignore U.S. Sanctions on Key Iranian Oil Buyers. – NaturalNews.com. May 6, 2026.
2. China orders companies to defy US sanctions in escalating oil war with Washington. – NaturalNews.com. May 6, 2026.
3. In 'Watershed Moment' China Orders Companies To Defy US Sanctions. – ZeroHedge. May 4, 2026.
4. China's De-Dollarization Push Meets Washington's Defense Of The Dollar. – ZeroHedge. James Gorrie. March 12, 2026.
5. The Iran Question Is All About China. – ZeroHedge. Zineb Riboua. March 2, 2026.

Explainer Infographic

---

---