The announcement places Meta's age-assurance system at the center of a widening debate over how platforms determine who is a minor online. The company said the system is designed to catch users who misrepresent their age at sign-up, a practice that has long complicated enforcement of teen safety rules [3][4].
ConnectSafely CEO Larry Magid expounded on the technology in a Nov. 6 post on Meta's website. He denied that the technology is facial recognition, explaining that the system looks "for general visual characteristics that suggest someone who is underage that may help estimate an age range.
Magid wrote that the visual analysis is not facial recognition and is not intended to identify the person. "Meta deactivates suspected under-13 accounts and requires proof of age to prevent deletion," he added [1]. The company's description of the system follows a pattern seen elsewhere in the industry, where platforms have expanded automated age checks to enforce under-18 rules [5].
As of writing, the feature is being applied on Instagram. But Meta added that it is continuing to roll out the technology on Facebook. Later this year, the new feature will be rolled out on Threads [1].
Meta said it has started using Apple's age-range signal in Australia as an additional method to help determine users' ages. "When a parent sets up a smartphone for their teen, they have the option for the app store to confirm the age of the person using the device and assign them an age range," the company said. The expansion is global in scope, with the company describing the change as applying its age-estimation technology worldwide [6][7].
The new technology follows a billion-dollar settlement between Meta and multiple U.S. jurisdictions in August over allegations that the Big Tech company endangered children. Reporting on the settlement described a court-supervised identity system for Facebook and Instagram users under the teen safety provisions [8].
A separate analysis noted that the agreement included a provision in which states agreed not to sue Meta under existing child safety laws over its retention and use of children's data, for the limited purpose of training and testing Meta's age-assurance model [9].
The Epoch Times reported that Meta recently filed a lawsuit that sought to block California from enforcing Assembly Bill (AB) 1709. The proposal bans online platforms from offering underage children features deemed to be psychologically exploitative that could result in compulsive use. Under AB 1709, accounts of children with such features must be deleted [1].
Despite Meta's opposition, the advocacy group Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) welcomed the bill in a September statement. "With AB 1709, California takes the right approach to protecting kids online," said Megan Iorio, director of EPIC’s platform governance and accountability program [1].