Pfizer's confidential report detailed the impacts of the vaccine on mortality and morbidity. The company was fully aware that the mRNA vaccine could cause a wave of serious health problems and deaths; its decision to push through with marketing the vaccine is tantamount to a crime against humanity.
Pfizer knew from the beginning that it was creating a killer vaccine. There had been no attempts made by governments so far to call for its withdrawal.
In February 2021, Pfizer already received over 1,200 reports of deaths caused by their vaccine and thousands more adverse events, including spontaneous abortions and cardiac disorders.
When it comes to vaccinations, the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) to prevent a single case, hospitalization, ICU admission or death is a standard way to measure its effectiveness. But the NNTV to prevent a single case is not very meaningful, considering that most people – children in particular – recover on their own.
In fact, a risk-benefit model shows that 5,248 children aged 5 to 11 will be killed by the Pfizer's mRNA vaccine to save 45 children from dying of coronavirus. That's equivalent to killing 117 children to save one.
However, NNTV is still important because it enables policymakers to evaluate tradeoffs between new drugs, a different existing drug or doing nothing. Big Pharma companies like Pfizer hate talking about NNTV when it comes to COVID-19 vaccines because the NNTV is so ridiculously high, it could not pass any honest risk-to-benefit analysis.
Ronald Brown, a health economist from Canada, estimated that the NNTV to prevent a single case is from 88 to 142.
This is quite optimistic as others calculated that the NNTV to prevent a single case is at 256. Using large data sets, German and Dutch researchers calculated the NNTV to be between 200 and 700 for the mRNA shot marketed by Pfizer. They went further and figured that the NNTV to prevent one death from COVID is " between 9,000 and 100,000 (95 percent confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate."
With the NNTV to prevent a single case already so high and with significant adverse events from the vaccine averaging 15 percent nationwide, Pfizer and the Food and Drug Administration do not dare calculate these numbers.
Big Tech seems to be helping them on this front. Former New York Times investigative reporter Alex Berenson received a lifetime ban from Twitter for posting about bad outcomes in Pfizer clinical trials.
For kids, the NNTV will likely even be higher as children ages five to 11 are at extremely low risk of death from COVID-19 in the first place.
In a meta-analysis combining data from five studies, it was found that the median infection fatality rate of children ages 0-19 is only 0.0027 percent, and even lower for children ages five to 11. Depending on the study one looks at, COVID-19 is slightly less dangerous or roughly equivalent to flu in children. (Related: FDA to authorize Pfizer's deadly COVID-19 vaccine boosters for all adults, despite accelerating post-vaccine deaths.)
By Pfizer's own admission, there was zero hospitalization, ICU admissions or deaths in the treatment control group of 2,300 children in the five to 11 age range. Thus, the NNTV in order to prevent a single ICU admission or death – according to the company's own data – is infinity.
Meaning, you could vaccinate every child in this age range and not prevent a single hospitalization, ICU admission or death.
Watch the video below to know why we should not let Big Government and Big Pharma vaccinate our children.
This video is from Tammy Cuthbert Garcia channel on Brighteon.com.
For more news about experimental jabs and their devastating side effects, visit Vaccines.news.