(Natural News) As we rapidly approach yet another presidential election cycle here in the United States, it can’t be emphasized enough that the very same fake news outlets and tech monopolies that have been screaming “Russian collusion!” nonstop for the past three years are now the ones actively colluding with each other to try to steal the next election from President Trump, as well as silence all online free speech.
Thanks to the brave undercover work of Project Veritas, we now know that Google was so upset at the outcome of the 2016 presidential election that it’s been scheming ever since about covert ways to make sure that it doesn’t happen again. Such tactics include removing search results for independent news articles, as well as bullying conservative Google employees into towing the leftist agenda.
We’ve also seen platforms like Vimeo and YouTube, the latter of which is owned by Google, remove truth-telling channels and content for supposedly violating their “Terms of Service,” which apparently means any deviation from the official, government-approved narratives concerning vaccines, health, and politics.
Everywhere you look online, in other words, there’s a war being waged against the First Amendment, as the tech overlords crack down on all independent thought in the name of fighting “hate speech” and “offensive” content. Ironically, these entities claim to be fighting “fascism,” while they themselves employ fascist tactics in an effort to silence all deviating thoughts and beliefs.
“The very existence of Google is incompatible with free society,” warns Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, about where all of this is headed. “Google must be shut down and permanently removed from society. Its engineers should be arrested, indicted and imprisoned for life to prevent them from repeating their evil schemes against humanity.”
For more related news about Big Tech’s offensive against free speech and the First Amendment, be sure to check out Tyranny.news.
But wait, isn’t the religion of leftism supposed to be about “love” and “tolerance” towards other people’s beliefs?
What always seems to stand out whenever left-leaning, authoritarian entities like Google and Vimeo decide to go after “violating” content is that they continually do this while pretending to be champions of “love” and “tolerance” for all – “all” meaning only those who agree with and push their agreed-upon leftist narratives, of course.
This digital “book-burning” that these powerful corporations are engaged in represents the very definition of fascism, in which only government-sanctioned narratives are allowed to spread and circulate. Everything else must be silenced, just like what took place, ironically, in the former Soviet Union with communism.
Those who lived under such oppression back then were routinely intimidated, threatened, and in some cases murdered by the powers that be simply for veering from the status quo – just like how today’s leftists are constantly bullying and assaulting non-leftists into believing the exact same things that they believe, or else.
The “anti-fascist” group Antifa, for instance, functions as the left’s army of foot soldiers today, enforcing total compliance with leftist ideals through violence – which the tech platforms, perhaps not surprisingly, now fully endorse.
It’s a total reemergence of Nazi Germany’s “brownshirts,” in essence, as the left attempts to herd everyone back into the groupthink fold through tyranny and oppression. And if they’re allowed to continue violating people’s constitutional rights without retribution, then the oppression will only get worse.
“It is now abundantly obvious that these tech giants are conspiring and colluding to carry out acts of extreme criminality and fraud against the world,” writes Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
“What has become clear to us at Natural News is that Vimeo, Google, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Pinterest, MailChimp and a long list of other tech companies are engaged in coordinated criminal racketeering and fraud to silence all independent voices and shore up their monopolies.”
Sources for this article include: