Subscribe (free)
About NaturalNews
Contact Us
Write for NaturalNews
Media Info
Advertising Info
Bone scans

Frequent bone scans for osteoporosis revealed as yet another medical scam

Friday, February 03, 2012 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: bone scans, osteoporosis, medical scam

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
(NaturalNews) There seems to be a scan for almost every medical condition these days. But not all of these scans have been proven safe or effective, or even necessary for that matter. A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) has revealed that bone mineral density scans, which check for early signs of the bone disease osteoporosis, are often conducted too frequently on many people, and in many cases may not even be necessary.

According to ABC News, Dr. Margaret Gourlay from the University of North Carolina and her colleagues evaluated data from nearly 5,000 women aged 67 years and older, none of whom had osteoporosis at the outset of a national health study they participated in beginning in the 1980s. Using public funds for their research, Gourlay and her team determined that women who have a healthy initial screening do not need another screening for up to 15 years.

This finding contrasts with current recommendations on bone mineral density tests which, admittedly, are not scientific, but have simply been made up over time. So-called medical experts say they really do not know how often people should get these screenings, which makes one wonder if they know whether or not the screenings are even effective to begin with. And yet most women are urged to get a bone mineral density test every one or two years (http://www.medicinenet.com/bone_density_scan/page5.htm).

"It's an expenditure of time, it's exposure to radiation, and it's a cost," said Dr. Virginia Moyer, head of the US Preventive Services Task Force, a government panel responsible for establishing testing guidelines, concerning bone mineral density tests. "And there's no reason to expose yourself to any risks if there's going to be no benefit."

The health risks Dr. Moyer speaks of involve the use of radiation as part of the testing procedure. While the amount of radiation emitted from a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan is said to be only a fraction of what is emitted during a chest x-ray, routine exposure to ionizing radiation is known to cause cancer and other health problems (http://www.naturalnews.com/ionizing_radiation.html).

Mammograms, medical x-rays, CT scans, and bone mineral density scans all emit ionizing radiation, and some of these procedures have questionable or unproven efficacy at providing any benefit. With medical authorities practically making up the rules as they go along, it seems, it is really anyone's guess whether or not such tests are worth the time, the expense, or the health risk.

Sources for this article include:


STAY INFORMED! Free subscription to the Health Ranger's email newsletter
Get breaking news alerts on GMOs, fluoride, superfoods, natural cures and more...
Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.