(NaturalNews) Emails and information circulating on the 'net point to a rumor that the World Health Organization (WHO) has released a pandemic virus into the population via a "mock-up" vaccine. One story cites a WHO announcement (
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/notes/h1n1_safety_vaccines_20...) which explains:
Also in Europe, some manufacturers have conducted advance studies using a so-called "mock-up" vaccine. Mock-up vaccines contain an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations and thus mimics the novelty of a pandemic virus. Such advance studies can greatly expedite regulatory approval.The point of these "mock-up" vaccines is to allow vaccine manufacturers to gain regulatory approvals for "placeholder" vaccines in advance of a pandemic. Once a pandemic appears, the vaccine manufacturer can then replace the "mock-up" viral strain in the vaccine with the newly emerging in-the-wild pandemic viral strain, thus speeding the time to market for the new pandemic vaccine.
This process is explained in more detail in this EMEA (European Medicines Agency) document:
http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/general/direct/pr/50155706en.pdfIt explains:
A mock-up pandemic influenza vaccine is a vaccine that mimics the future pandemic influenza vaccine in terms of its composition and manufacturing method. However, because the virus strain causing the pandemic is not known, the mock-up vaccine contains another flu strain instead. This is a strain that is not circulating in humans, and to which humans have not been exposed in the past. This enables the company to test its vaccine in preparation for any flu pandemic that may occur in the future, by carrying out studies with the mock-up vaccine that predict how people will react to the vaccine when the strain causing a pandemic is included.There are two things I find quite concerning in this statement:
#1) The viral strain chosen for this mock-up is one that is not currently circulating in humans. Thus, they are choosing a viral strain to which humans have no acquired immune defense.
#2) These
mock-up vaccines are tested on humans in order to "predict how people will react." Thus, the drug companies are engaged in injecting people with viral fragments that have never been previously encountered by humans.
Obviously, if mistakes are made in the processing of these
vaccines, causing
live viruses to be injected (instead of sufficiently weakened viruses), this could result in the spread of that new virus among the human population. Thus, there is the
possibility that this process could be used as vector through which infectious disease is spread, but it all depends on which
virus is chosen for the mock-up vaccines.
And that's never explained in any public documents that I could find. Where do the drug companies find these viruses to which humans have never been exposed? Are they getting them from military labs? Animal experiments? Are they specifically chosen to be similar to H1N1, or do they have a completely different protein configuration?
It is the selection of this viral strain that appears to be one of the most important factors in all this.
WHO isn't running these experiments
In any case, it's clear that this mock-up process is pursued by vaccine manufacturers, not the WHO itself, so I disagree with any report that states the WHO itself released a
pandemic virus into the population. The WHO is merely
explaining what a mock-up vaccine is. They aren't the ones manufacturing these mock-up vaccines or testing them on humans. That's being done by the drug companies.
It also seems that calling the mock-up virus a "pandemic virus" may be inaccurate. There's no way for us to know whether the mock-up virus is a pandemic virus or just some harmless flu strain that poses no threat and isn't even contagious. Of course, if the drug companies were maliciously trying to
cause a pandemic, this is one way they could potentially get it off the ground. And that's a distinct possibility, given all the profit the drug companies are generating from the swine flu pandemic. But it's still just conjecture at this point (unless there's some other documentation proof on this that I don't know about, which is certainly possible).
The bottom line? These "mock-up" vaccines are a worrisome issue. It's clear that swine flu vaccines are essentially
experimental and that the People are being treated like guinea pigs in all this. The motivation is clearly a Big Pharma profit motive. But I'm not aware of any evidence suggesting that the World Health Organization itself released a pandemic virus into the population via "mock-up" vaccines. That notion may be an inadvertent misinterpretation of the publicly available documents.
The job of releasing a pandemic virus into the wild was likely accomplished by the drug companies, if anyone. And they don't really need to use vaccines to release a new pandemic into the population... All they need is to drive around Mexico City with one infected person who sneezes on a few doorknobs.
Abandoning all science in the name of vaccine propaganda
What's really worrisome about all this, by the way, is that the mock-up vaccine process allows drug companies to win
pre-approval for a pandemic vaccine even before the pandemic appears! Once the pandemic is under way, the drug manufacturer essentially pulls a laboratory copy-and-paste maneuver to pop the pandemic virus into the vaccines, replacing the mock-up virus. From there, it's an orgy of mass injections using this completely untested new pandemic viral strain!
Essentially, the "mock-up vaccine" process allows drug companies to gain approval for vaccines
before they even exist.
How, exactly, is this good science? It isn't, of course. It's just more vaccine mongering by Big Pharma combined with the utter abandonment of good science. Pandemic vaccines were never about science in the first place, of course. They're all about making money and scaring people into signing up for injections that will likely kill more people than they save.
I'm glad people are raising awareness of the "mock-up" vaccine issue. It's a topic that deserves closer inspection. It could even turn out to be one of the vectors through which a pandemic is inadvertently (or intentionally) unleashed.
Additional sources:Novartis mock-up vaccine:
http://www.bio-medicine.org/medicine-news/E-U--Panel-Backs-Novartis-M...Bacter's mock-up vaccine:
http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=100925WHO vaccine safety explanation: (Warning: contains pro-vaccine propaganda)
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/notes/h1n1_safety_vaccines_20...
About the author: Mike Adams is an award-winning journalist and holistic nutritionist with a passion for teaching people how to improve their health He has authored more than 1,800 articles and dozens of reports, guides and interviews on natural health topics, and he has published numerous courses on preparedness and survival, including financial preparedness, emergency food supplies, urban survival and tactical self-defense. Adams is an independent journalist with strong ethics who does not get paid to write articles about any product or company. In 2010, Adams created TV.NaturalNews.com, a natural living video sharing site featuring thousands of user videos on foods, fitness, green living and more. He also launched an online retailer of environmentally-friendly products (BetterLifeGoods.com) and uses a portion of its profits to help fund non-profit endeavors. He's also the founder and CEO of a well known email mail merge software developer whose software, 'Email Marketing Director,' currently runs the NaturalNews email subscriptions. Adams is currently the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a 501(c)3 non-profit, and regularly pursues cycling, nature photography, Capoeira and Pilates. He's also author a large number of health books offered by Truth Publishing and is the creator of numerous reference website including NaturalPedia.com and the free downloadable Honest Food Guide. His websites also include the free reference sites HerbReference.com and HealingFoodReference.com. Adams believes in free speech, free access to nutritional supplements and the innate healing ability of the human body. Known on the 'net as 'the Health Ranger,' Adams shares his ethics, mission statements and personal health statistics at www.HealthRanger.org
Have comments on this article? Post them here:
people have commented on this article.
Friday, September 04, 2009
Email this article to a friend
Now Available from 
