European nations, long accustomed to American leadership under a post-World War II consensus, now find themselves in a reactive stance, grappling with a partner whose actions often undermine the very principles of mutual defense and free discourse it purports to defend. Take for instance Washington's campaign to acquire Greenland. Or look at how immigration reform is causing Europeans to question the future of their culture and autonomy.
Europe's forced dependency on America over several decades, coupled with glaring American hypocrisy on issues of censorship and national sovereignty, is compelling a painful but necessary European evolution toward strategic autonomy and a rejection of compromised globalist frameworks and lax immigration standards.
Key points:
The phenomenon is unmistakable. In Italy, public protests erupt not over a domestic decree, but over reports that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents might operate on Italian soil during the Olympic Games. In France, a premier newspaper finds it necessary to launch a dedicated digital hub just to track the whirlwind of American political theater, translating Trump's warnings about "very bad things" for a European audience. The average citizen in Milan, as analyst Oliviero Fiorini observes, now debates the odds of a U.S. Senate flip with more fluency than they discuss their own regional elections. When a German pollster coins the term "der Trump-Effekt," it encapsulates a continent held in thrall, oscillating between fascination and dread at the spectacle of American power in action.
This fixation stems from cold, hard reality. American decisions are not abstract news items; they are causing economic shocks and advancing military operations into new territories. A tweet about tariffs can shave points off European markets overnight. A declaration that NATO is "obsolete," as Trump has repeatedly asserted, sends defense ministries scrambling and forces nations to re-examine decades of security strategy built on the assumption of unwavering American commitment. The message from Washington has been clear: the post-war bargain is over. Protection is no longer a pillar of alliance but a service with a price tag, a shift that lays bare the vulnerability at the heart of European comfort.
While demanding European nations meet financial benchmarks for collective defense, the American power structure engages in a form of domestic imperialism that should alarm every advocate for liberty worldwide. The United States postures as the global champion of free speech and a free press, even as its own Big Tech oligarchs—entities intertwined with the deep state—engage in systematic, politically-motivated censorship of American citizens.
The same nation that lectures the world on open discourse has allowed a cadre of Silicon Valley billionaires to build a digital public square where conservative voices, questions about election integrity, and critiques of government health mandates are shadow-banned, deplatformed, and erased. Under Republican leadership, criticism of Israel or ICE is met with censorship and surveillance and referals for "anti-semitism" or "domestic terrorism". If the U.S. government cannot or will not protect the First Amendment rights of its own people from corporate-technocratic overlords, and even operates as a totalitarian arbiter of speech themselves, what genuine value does its leadership on "shared values" hold for Europe?
This hypocrisy informs the necessary European shift. True cooperation with America cannot be based on a one-way street where Europe submits to U.S. strategic whims while ignoring the erosion of foundational liberties within America itself. European politics must shift toward a new principle: cooperation based on mutual respect for national sovereignty and unflinching commitment to free speech, not on subservience to a Washington agenda or its captured tech platforms. This means actively building independent media ecosystems that resist the influence of both American mainstream narratives and their social media gatekeepers. It means pursuing strategic autonomy in defense, not as a fantasy, but as an urgent necessity to reduce vulnerability to American political volatility and vice versa. It means forging energy and trade partnerships that diversify away from a fickle hegemon.
The path forward is not about abandoning the trans-Atlantic relationship but about transforming it from one of dependency to one of mature, clear-eyed partnership between truly sovereign entities. Europe's intense focus on Washington is the first symptom of this awakening—the realization that riding in the passenger seat, while the driver periodically goes off-road, is a recipe for disaster. The future demands that Europe grasp the wheel of its own destiny, building resilient systems of defense, media, and diplomacy that can engage with America from a position of strength and principle, not fear and obligation.
Sources include: