Big Pharma’s financial influence over the U.S. Senate: What we know so far…
02/05/2025 // Lance D Johnson // Views

The influence of the Pharmaceuticals/Health Products industry on U.S. Senators is evident in the substantial contributions made to both Democratic and Republican lawmakers. Below is a detailed breakdown of the contributions received by key Senators, highlighting the significant sums from the industry and from Pfizer Inc. PAC specifically. This Big Pharma corruption is systemic and pervades both political parties.

During the confirmation hearing for incoming HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Senators took turns lecturing him about vaccines and other drug-related policies. However, honest vaccine and drug policy cannot be realized if Big Pharma is financially manipulating the Congress. Here's what we know so far about Big Pharma's influence over certain Senators:

Democrats

Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,953,613

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $0

Raphael Warnock (D-GA)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,763,425

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $0

Patty Murray (D-WA)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,616,081

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $49,000

Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,224,145

Ron Wyden (D-OR)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,207,873

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $21,100

Michael Bennet (D-CO)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $730,106

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $19,000

Ed Markey (D-MA)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $661,442

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $9,000

Mark Warner (D-VA)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $654,210

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $28,000

Tim Kaine (D-VA)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $609,514

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $35,000

Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $604,539

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $17,000

Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $575,914

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $2,000

Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NM)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $537,781

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $10,000

Maggie Hassan (D-NH)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $467,999

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $0

Andy Kim (D-NJ)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $326,024

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $0

John Hickenlooper (D-CO)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $317,713

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $0

Tina Smith (D-MN)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $226,444

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $0

Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $96,643

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $0

Republicans

Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,380,138

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $39,600

Bill Cassidy (R-LA)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,230,679

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $24,000

Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,380,138

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $39,600

John Cornyn (R-TX)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,133,363

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $30,500

Tim Scott (R-SC)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,128,425

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $33,500

Chuck Grassley (R-IA)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $1,013,856

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $57,250

Mike Crapo (R-ID)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $938,784

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $47,500

Todd Young (R-IN)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $934,751

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $19,500

Thom Tillis (R-NC)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $914,944

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $23,350

John Barrasso (R-WY)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $908,952

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $40,000

John Thune (R-SD)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $666,492

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $32,500

Susan Collins (R-ME)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $608,797

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $25,600

Steve Daines (R-MT)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $469,268

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $15,000

Markwayne Mullin (R-OK)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $440,498

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $33,000

Ron Johnson (R-WI)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $369,440

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $10,000

Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $349,777

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $35,000

Rand Paul (R-KY)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $269,653

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $22,500

James Lankford (R-OK)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $259,570

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $19,500

Jim Banks (R-IN)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $232,210

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $6,750

Roger Marshall (R-KS)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $220,043

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $22,500

Josh Hawley (R-MO)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $130,492

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $-2,600 (returned)

Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $40,680

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $5,000

John Husted (R-OH)*

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $0

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $29,150

Ashley Moody (R-FL)*

Total from Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $0

Pfizer Inc. PAC: $0

Big Pharma must be kicked out of our government

The industry has made substantial contributions to both Democratic and Republican lawmakers, indicating a strategic approach to ensure influence across the political spectrum. For instance, Senators like Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) have received over $1.3 million each, highlighting the industry's broad reach.

The significant financial contributions from Big Pharma likely play a role in shaping policy decisions and legislative priorities. Senators who receive substantial funding may be more inclined to support policies that favor the industry, such as those related to drug pricing, regulation, and research funding. This raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the need for transparency and restriction in political funding.

This research highlights the need for comprehensive campaign finance reform to mitigate the influence of powerful industries on lawmakers. Measures such as stricter disclosure requirements, limits on contributions, and public financing of elections could help reduce the potential for undue influence and ensure that policy decisions are made in the public interest rather than for the benefit of wealthy donors.

Sources include:

WSIMG.com [PDF]



Take Action:
Support Natural News by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Copy
Embed article link:
Copy
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to NaturalNews.com (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
App Store
Android App
eTrust Pro Certified

This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
Natural News uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Close
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.