Federal court temporarily blocks Biden’s attempt to force all employers to pay for workers’ abortions
06/25/2024 // Laura Harris // Views

The United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana has temporarily blocked the administration of President Joe Biden's attempt to interpret the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) to mean that all employers, regardless of religious belief or affiliation, are mandated to pay for the abortions of their workers.

In late December 2022, Congress passed the PWFA, which requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide "reasonable accommodations" for employees with pregnancy-related needs. This bipartisan legislation came into effect on June 27, 2023.

However, Biden's Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) proposed a rule that seeks to expand the definition of "pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions" under the PWFA to include "having or choosing not to have an abortion." In April, the EEOC issued a final regulation, to become effective on June 18, with extensive interpretive guidance relating to the implementation of the PWFA.

As a response, the Washington, D.C.-based public interest law firm Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, joined by the states of Louisiana and Mississippi, filed a federal lawsuit last month to block its enforcement.

In 2022, lawmakers, including Reps. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) and Mary Miller (R-IL), opposed the interpretation of EEOC. Foxx and Miller argued that the PWFA's text did not mention abortion and was not intended to mandate abortion accommodations. They stressed the legislative record, which they say explicitly confirms that the PWFA was not designed to compel employers to support abortion. (Related: Federal appeals court temporarily limits Idaho’s near-total abortion ban due to ongoing legal proceedings.)

We are building the infrastructure of human freedom and empowering people to be informed, healthy and aware. Explore our decentralized, peer-to-peer, uncensorable Brighteon.io free speech platform here. Learn about our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Every purchase at HealthRangerStore.com helps fund our efforts to build and share more tools for empowering humanity with knowledge and abundance.

The court issued a temporary injunction on June 17, asserting that "EEOC has exceeded its statutory authority to implement the PWFA." The ruling criticized the EEOC for attempting to override Congressional intent and infringe upon state sovereignty.

"'Abortion' is a term that is readily understood by everyone," the ruling noted. "If Congress had intended to mandate that employers accommodate elective abortions under the PWFA, it would have spoken clearly when enacting the statute, particularly given the enormous social, religious, and political importance of the abortion issue in our nation."

"The EEOC twisted a law protecting expecting mothers and their babies and co-opted the workplaces of over 130 million Americans to support abortion," Becket attorney Laura Wolk Slavis responded. "That is an abuse of power; no one should have to choose between their conscience and protecting pregnant women… This ruling is an important step in ensuring that American workplaces can be free to continue serving their communities consistent with their beliefs."

Pro-lifers warned lawmakers beforehand about the potential threats EEOC could pose to religious employers

In 2022, critics warned that the lack of specific protections for religious organizations and its broad definitions could be used to infringe on pro-life employers’ conscience rights.

"Under the bill… pro-life groups can be sued if they don’t provide their employees special leave to get abortions," Tom McClusky, the director of government affairs for Catholic Vote, said at that time. "I’m surprised some pro-life groups that aren’t covered under RFRA [Religious Freedom Restoration Act] don’t seem to realize how this bill would impact their own operations."

Erika Ahern of Catholic Vote echoed a similar statement. Ahern stressed the potential of the EEOC to interpret the provisions in PWFA that could conflict with pro-life and Catholic beliefs.

"The EEOC does not typically act in a way that aligns with pro-life or Catholic views. In general, the EEOC has interpreted 'pregnancy-related' discrimination issues to include protecting workers’ ‘right’ to abortion," Ahern wrote.

But despite these warnings, the bill still garnered support from religious organizations like the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which applauded the PWFA's "efforts which demonstrate a respect for life, family and the dignity of workers."

Read more news about abortion post-Roe v. Wade in the U.S. at Abortions.news.

Watch this clip from "Judging Freedom" as Judge Andrew Napolitano discusses how legalizing abortion changed America.

This video is from the channel What Is Happening on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

South Carolina judge upholds six-week “heartbeat” abortion ban.

Florida’s six-week “heartbeat” abortion ban took effect on May 1 after a year of legal battles.

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs signs legislation repealing abortion ban with help of 5 GOP state lawmakers.

New Biden HHS rule makes it more difficult to investigate people who violate state abortion bans.

Newsom calls on Florida women to come to California for abortions after passage of six-week abortion ban in Sunshine State.

Sources include:

LifeSiteNews.com 1

EEOC.gov 1

LifeSiteNews.com 2

EEOC.gov 2


Take Action:
Support Natural News by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Embed article link:
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to NaturalNews.com (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
App Store
Android App
eTrust Pro Certified

This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
Natural News uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.