A "multi-decade, senior-level, current," CIA officer turned whistleblower testified before Congress this week that a bribery scheme is behind all the confusion between whether COVID came from a lab or from bat soup at some filthy wet market.
Two separate letters penned by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic and the House Permanent Select Subcommittee on Intelligence to CIA Director William J. Burns and former CIA Chief Operation Officer Andrew Makridis explain in detail the allegations of the whistleblower – you can read them below:
New testimony from a highly credible whistleblower alleges @CIA rewarded six analysts with significant financial incentives to change their COVID-19 origins conclusion from a lab-leak to zoonosis. pic.twitter.com/KIemfi2Wgl
— Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic (@COVIDSelect) September 12, 2023
(Related: It appears the government also paid off Big Pharma to manufacture COVID "vaccines" that are intentionally designed to kill unborn babies.)
It was SSCP Chairman Brad Wenstrup and HPSCI Chairman Mike Turner's letter to Burns specifically that lays out the testimony of the whistleblower, who is described as "a highly credible senior-level CIA officer" who says the CIA offered "significant monetary incentive" to the agency's analysts in exchange for them changing their story on the true origins of COVID.
Of the seven CIA analysts who were originally tasked to investigate and come up with a thesis for COVID's true origins, six of them came to the conclusion that it came from a lab in Wuhan, while only one went with what would become the government's official story about COVID.
The whistleblower put it like this: the six CIA analysts who were offered bribes by their superiors if they agreed to change their stories "believed the intelligence and science were sufficient to make a low-confidence assessment that COVID-19 originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China."
It should be noted that all seven of the analysts who were part of the CIA's Covid Discovery Team are "multi-disciplinary and experienced officers with significant scientific expertise" who are more than qualified, we are told, to make this kind of determination.
However, when the CIA's higher-ups did not like what six of the seven analysts ultimately concluded, they were offered "financial incentives" to "change their conclusion in favor of a zoonotic origin."
"The seventh member of the Team, who also happened to be the most senior, was the lone officer to believe COVID-19 originated through zoonosis," the committee chairmen wrote in their letter.
There probably never would have been any uncertainty at all about COVID's true origins had that hush money not been offered in the first place. The consensus would have been that COVID came from a lab, and that would have been the end of it.
Instead, "the eventual public determination of uncertainty," as the chairmen put it, would cast an ever-present shadow of doubt about where COVID came from – and some evidence would seem to suggest that COVID is not even real, and that it is instead some kind of chemical weapon or consequence of 5G or other EMF exposure.
Whatever the case may be, the CIA really discredited itself with this whole COVID affair. One wonders if the CIA is actually behind the release of COVID, hence why it does not want people knowing the truth about where it came from or what it even is.
More related news can be found at BigGovernment.news.
Sources for this article include: