(Natural News) In order to continue peddling an endless stream of new high-profit “vaccines” on the public, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer is engaging in “directed evolution” projects designed to “mutate” the virus on purpose.
Project Veritas learned all this in another undercover bombshell interview, this time with Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer’s Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations, and mRNA Scientific Planner. Walker revealed that Pfizer is intentionally trying to spread new “variants” and “subvariants” of covid in order to create and sell new injections.
“One of the things we’re exploring is, like, why don’t we just mutate it [covid] ourselves so we could create – preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re going to do that though, there’s a risk of, like, as you could imagine – no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f***ing viruses.”
Walker urged the interviewer: “don’t tell anyone, promise you won’t tell anyone.” He then proceeded to reveal how Pfizer is going about trying to mutate covid using primates. (Related: In 2021, Project Veritas blew the lid on Facebook’s global censorship of “vaccine hesitancy”.)
“The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [covid] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere,” he added. “Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bulls**t.”
Be sure to watch the full undercover video interview below:
Pfizer is mutating covid on purpose, but “that is not what we say to the public,” Walker admits
Right off the bat in the interview when asked if Pfizer “is thinking about mutating covid,” Walker admitted that while this “is not what we say to the public,” it is exactly what Pfizer is doing to keep the vaccine cash flowing.
The interviewer then responded to say that what Walker described sounds a whole lot like gain-of-function research, which is illegal. Walker immediately responded with “no, no, no, no,” and proceeded to instead describe the process as “directed evolution.”
“You do things like selected directional mutations to try to see if you can make it more potent,” Walker revealed. “So there is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that’s going work.”
“There’s a revolving door for all government officials,” Walker further stated. “It’s pretty good for the industry, to be honest.”
In other words, many of the people working at regulatory bodies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) either previously worked at, or will soon work at, a drug company like Pfizer to grease the skids for all the new drugs coming down the pipeline.
“It’s bad for everyone else in America … because if the regulators who have to approve our drugs, you know, that once they stop being a regulator, they want to come work for the company, they’re not going to be as harsh on the company,” is how Walker explained it.
Pfizer using “selected directional mutations” to make new covid strains that are more “potent”
The undercover Project Veritas reporter really pressed Walker about the “directed evolution” protocols, which sound a whole lot like gain-of-function research. Walker initially denied that these are the same, but later in the conversation admitted that Pfizer is, in fact, employing a type of gain-of-function research that is slightly different than the one employed in Wuhan to create the original covid strain.
“Well, you’re not supposed to do gain of function research with the viruses,” Walker responded to the reporter’s questions about the differentiation. “They recommend not. But you do things like selected directional mutations to try to see if you can make it more potent.”
“They’re still kind of conducting the experiments on it, but it seems like from what I’ve heard they’re kind of optimizing it. But they’re going slow, because everyone’s very cautious. They obviously don’t want to accelerate too much. But I think they’re also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you’re trying to figure out future mutation.”
Pfizer’s use of the term “directed evolution” rather than gain-of-function apparently lets the company off the hook for this kind of research, which would otherwise be illegal – and probably still is.
Walker explained that by tampering with covid in this manner, Pfizer can predict, so to speak, which new variants and subvariants will emerge next and have an ongoing stream of new vaccines at the ready for rapid distribution.
“So part of what they want to do is to some extent try to figure out if, like, you know how there’s all these new strains and variants that just pop up?” Walker explained. “Why don’t we try to catch them before they pop up in nature and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically for new variants.”
“So that’s why they’re thinking if you control it in a lab, then you say ‘Oh, this is a new epitope.’ And so then if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine kind of working on it.”
Pfizer doesn’t always get it right, Walker admitted, but “either way it’s going to be a cash cow.”
“Covid will probably be a cash cow for us for a while going forward which I obviously like,” Walker said with a grin.
All government positions are “a revolving door,” Walker says
But wait: is this not all illegal? It would be if the entire government wasn’t a revolving door with industry. According to Walker, all government positions are a revolving door with industry.
“So in the pharma industry, all the government officials who review our drugs, mostly they come work for pharma companies,” he explained. “Like in the military, all the army and defense government officials eventually go work for the defense companies afterwards.”
The latest news about the pharmaceutical industry can be found at Corruption.news.
Sources for this article include: