In a video released last month, MEP Christine Anderson said the WHO was attempting to illegitimately seize de-facto governmental power through the creation of an intergovernmental negotiating body (INB), which is made up of non-democratically elected members. (Related: RFK Jr.: CIA-led 'military response' to pandemic was meant to drive democracy from the world and usher in global totalitarianism.)
This means that the WHO will have power over its member states in the event of a pandemic and will not need the involvement or consultation with national governments or national parliaments to do so.
In a new video posted May 8 on her YouTube channel, Anderson explained that she asked the European Commission to what extent it would ensure that the principles of the people's rule be respected and that citizens would not be subjected to the arbitrariness of an unelected entity.
"The answer I received to my question a few hours ago is clear and brief: not at all," she said.
The WHO announced in a press release on December 21, 2021, that the World Health Assembly agreed to kickstart a global process to establish an intergovernmental negotiating body to draft and negotiate a WHO convention, agreement or other international instruments regarding pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
This was also announced on the official EU council website, which stated that the body will hold its next meeting on August 1 and will deliver a progress report on the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023, with the aim to adopt the instrument by 2024.
The video posted on the EU Council website also stated that the world must be prepared for "next time."
This very idea of a future pandemic was the main argument behind the creation of the INB. According to Anderson, such empowerment could constitute a direct attack on the rule of the people by the people, which is the most elementary principle of any democracy.
This plan, she argued, is easy for anyone to see through. Anderson emphasized that "a democratically non-legitimized body, into which the richest of the super-rich buy their way through donations, is to decide in the future whether a pandemic situation exists, in order to then directly take over governmental power."
Anderson explained that the composition of the WHO is not based on democratic elections and that the decision-makers sitting there can issue instructions, but they are not accountable to anyone and cannot be held politically responsible. (Related: WHO Pandemic Treaty: A power-grabbing act to control health responses of UN member countries.)
"You, as a citizen, will therefore no longer have any political influence over whom you entrust with the administration of your fundamental rights," she said.
Anderson posted the link to both her question to the European Commission and the answer she received, noting that not a single time did the response mention words like citizen, democracy, rule of the people or political responsibility.
If the European Commission mentioned those words, it could have "fostered the trust of citizens and exposed as fake news and conspiracy theories all the Telegram messages that talk about a new world order or a world government under the guise of WHO by simply stating that it will ensure that democratic decision-making processes are maintained," she argued.
The MEP also said the Commission could have simply stated that it is very important not to bypass citizens and not to patronize them, but it didn't. Anderson went on to describe the answer to her question as a "blah, blah" about the WHO that also contained a promise that the European Commission will consult with "relevant stakeholders" throughout the process of creating the new instrument.
Visit Pandemic.news for more news and updates about the WHO's Pandemic Treaty.
Watch the video below to know more about the proposed Pandemic Treaty and how it can potentially eradicate national sovereignty.
This story is from the Free4eva Media channel on Brighteon.com.