MEP Christine Anderson, who is part of the German far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) political party, made the warning in a video. She mentioned that an intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) established by the World Health Assembly (WHA) has been working to revise the treaties between the global health body and its member states since March 1, 2022.
The revisions aim to give the WHO "de facto governing power over its member states in the event of a pandemic, without involvement or consultation with national governments or national parliaments." This serves as a "direct attack on the rule of the people by the people, the most elementary principle of any democracy," she added. The German MEP also compared the move to "nine foxes and a rabbit democratically voting on what to have for dinner."
A Dec. 1, 2021 press release said the WHA's decision following a special session empowers the INB to "draft and negotiate a WHO convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response."
The INB held its first meeting on March 1, with a second meeting scheduled on Aug. 1. A progress report is set to be presented to the 76th WHA meeting in 2023, and the final draft will be turned in for consideration at the 77th WHA meeting the year after.
However, the AfD lawmaker explained: "The plan, for anyone who can use [their] thinking skills, is easy to see through. A democratically non-legitimized body, into which the richest of the super-rich buy their way through donations, is to decide in the future whether a pandemic situation exists, in order to then directly take over governmental power."
She added that if the INB's pandemic treaty takes effect, the WHO can then restrict fundamental rights in its member nations, "almost like a world government." (Related: Be warned: The World Health Organization's "Pandemic Treaty" will destroy all remaining freedoms and unleash a global MEDICAL DICTATORSHIP.)
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus remarked in the press release that the WHA's decision was "historic in nature" and "vital in its mission."
"The COVID-19 pandemic has shone a light on the many flaws in the global system to protect people from pandemics – the most vulnerable people going without vaccines; health workers without needed equipment to perform their life-saving work; and 'me-first' approaches that stymie the global solidarity needed to deal with a global threat," he said.
Anderson is not the only individual expressing disagreement over the pandemic treaty. "The HighWire" host Del Bigtree and journalist Jefferey Jaxen also joined the ranks of people critical of the WHO's encroachment on sovereignty, airing their thoughts on the matter.
"They're planning on signing this treaty in 2024. This WHO pandemic treaty is really important because it's a one-stop shop, it’s just like a lock and key. State sovereignty is over, country sovereignty is over. Top-down bio-surveillance, vaccine passports, turnkey everything for your country, essentially," said Jaxen.
"Let's do something here. I want to put two thoughts together, folks. Ask [yourselves]: Is there really an agenda going on? The WHO obviously is not an American organization. It really wants to be the World Health Order, [and] that is what it is turning into," Bigtree said.
"It wants to dictate. It wants to supersede your president, your senators [and] your congresspeople. It wants to be the governing authority if there just happens to be another pandemic 365 days after the last one – which should be 100 times faster than any natural form of a pandemic before."
Tyranny.news has more stories about the WHO's pandemic treaty and how it threatens sovereignty.
Watch "American Journal" host Harrison Smith explaining how the WHO pandemic treaty will destroy national sovereignty below.
This video is from the InfoWars channel on Brighteon.com.