Sen. Tom Cotton introduces bill banning federal funds for teaching the New York Times’ revisionist history project
10/05/2020 // Franz Walker // Views

On Thursday, July 23, Sen. Tom Cotton introduced a bill banning the use of federal funds for teaching the New York Times's “1619 Project,” a concept that pushes the idea that the United States was founded on slavery.

Called the Saving American History Act of 2020, the bill asserts that the U.S. was founded on July 4, 1776, with the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

“The New York Times’s 1619 Project is a racially divisive, revisionist account of history that denies the noble principles of freedom and equality on which our nation was founded,” said the Senator in a press statement. “Not a single cent of federal funding should go to indoctrinate young Americans with this left-wing garbage.”

A project with an egregious claim

The Pulitzer Prize-winning 1619 Project is an ongoing project started by The New York Times Magazine in 2019 with the goal of re-examining the legacy of slavery in America. The project was timed to coincide with the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first enslaved Africans in the Virginia colony.

Originally conceived by the magazine as a special issue for August 2019, the 1619 Project soon turned into a full-fledged project. It includes contributions from the newspaper's writers, including essays on the history of different aspects of American life that the authors have stated are rooted “in slavery and its aftermath.”

Currently, the project has its own broadsheet section in the newspaper as well as live events and a multiple-episode podcast series.


Fact-checkers have already voiced concerns

Even before Cotton introduced his bill, concerns had already been raised about the content contained within the 1619 Project.

The New York Times claims that the writers’ contributions were deeply researched and their arguments verified by a team of fact-checkers. However, a number of historians have criticized the project, asking for corrections for inaccurate claims.

Leslie M. Harris was one such historian. Harris, who actually worked as a fact-checker on the project, claimed that the authors ignored her corrections.

“Despite my advice, the Times published the incorrect statement about the American Revolution anyway, in Hannah-Jones’ introductory essay,” stated Harris about the argument made by the project's principal author Nikole Hannah-Jones that the American Revolution was fought in part, to preserve slavery in North America. (Related: Report: The Ochs-Sulzberger family that owns the New York Times were slave owners.)

Hannah-Jones’ claim has since become a lightning rod for critics, one that Harris warned would be used to discredit the work.

“I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking,” she said in an opinion piece in Politico. “So far, that’s exactly what has happened.”

Since then, Hannah-Jones has admitted that she overstated her argument about slavery and the American Revolution in her essay. She stated that she plans to amend this argument for the book version of the project.

Project already being taught in schools

Despite admissions from the project’s own lead author that some of its arguments were overstated, a number of schools, including those in Buffalo, N.Y.; Chicago; Newark, N.J.; and Washington D.C., have already incorporated it into their curricula.

It was in part, due to this that Cotton penned his bill. According to the Republican from Arkansas – who is widely seen as a presidential candidate for 2024 – the entire premise of the 1619 Project “is factually, historically flawed.”

Should his bill be passed, it would prohibit K-12 schools and school districts from using federal funds to teach the 1619 Project.

“America is a great and noble country founded on the proposition that all mankind is created equal,” he said in an interview with the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. “We have always struggled to live up to that promise, but no country has ever done more to achieve it.”

Despite his bill, Cotton agreed that the study of slavery and “its role and impact on the development of our country” was important, as it was necessary to understand America.

While he admits that the practice remained legal when the country was founded “the union was built in a way, as Lincoln said, to put slavery on the course to its ultimate extinction.”

Sources include: 1 2

Take Action:
Support Natural News by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Embed article link:
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
App Store
Android App
eTrust Pro Certified

This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
Natural News uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.