(Natural News) It’s now apparent that political pressure dictates public health policy; and if the Democrats had their way, they would use coronavirus “cases” to dictate public perception of their political opposition indefinitely and use the fear of a virus as a weapon to control people’s lives into the unforeseeable future. This is why, to democrats, tallying and broadcasting statistically irrelevant coronavirus “cases” is more important than understanding viral load and immune system function, which are the most important aspects of controlling spread and ensuring healthy recovery from infections.
For evidence of these political games, look no further than the democrat presidential nominee, Joe Biden, who has no hope for America’s recovery and growth. He said he would implement an (illegal) “federal mask mandate” starting late January 2021. He even mentioned he would lock the country down further, which would lead to forced vaccination with experimental cell-modifying, DNA-altering inoculations.
Who decides the metrics that are currently restricting human freedoms?
Who gets to decide the metrics of data for which human populations can have their freedoms again? Are people’s lives controlled by the number of cases that can be tallied in a given week? Where does a data curve begin and end? Are people’s lives dictated by the testing kit’s positivity rate (which is fundamentally flawed from the start)? Are the controls dictated by hospital bed capacity and mortality rates? If so, why aren’t strategies for enhancing immune function taught and implemented to prevent surge capacity and complications that lead to death?
For how long can emergency orders be used to control human populations? Is the science behind these metrics resolute, or are the methods of testing and isolation flawed to such a degree, that public health policy will never allow for human freedoms again?
If people are not allowed to live normally, what are the determining factors of data that dictate these restrictions, and how might this data be fraudulently collected, interpreted and misunderstood, so it can be used as a political weapon to hold people down, control elections, control economies and distort public perception, among other agendas?
Why are democratic governors suddenly not taking new CDC guidance?
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recently changed its testing recommendations. They now advise not to test “asymptomatic” people for coronavirus and not to isolate and test every contact of someone who tested positive. This is a step in the right direction for understanding where infectious spread is actually occurring. The FDA-approved tests for detecting covid-19 are fundamentally flawed and regularly produce false positives. As long as false positives are part of the data pool, there will always be “new cases” that can then be interpreted as “outbreaks,” perpetuating pandemic messaging that keeps people living in a state of emergency, fear and restricted liberty. The key to solving the spread of the virus is understanding viral load and immune system function.
Many covid-19 tests are merely detecting non-infectious viral debris and labeling this as a “new case,” especially when so-called asymptomatic contacts are tested. This perpetual detection of non-infectious viral debris does not represent active “cases” of infectious disease and should not be tallied as such. An asymptomatic “case” might be hundreds of millions of times less significant in terms of viral multiplication and transmission when compared to an active, symptomatic case where live infectious virus material is spread through the aerosols of an infected patient.
Why are democratic governors suddenly ignoring the new CDC guidance, when they had followed it religiously for so long? Andrew Cuomo joined a group of democratic governors who now reject the new CDC rule, as they continue to tally up meaningless case data to force more controls over people’s lives.
Could it be that these dictators want to continue tallying “cases” so they can use meaningless data and fear tactics to control people a little longer? Could it be that their political games hold the country back, as they ignore the most important aspects of helping the country move forward, such as understanding viral load, viral multiplication, immune suppression, immune function, and how to help the most vulnerable in their state?
Read more about the lengths democrats are willing to go in order to achieve the socialist global agenda at Tyranny.news.