The New Yorker just jumped the climate shark, finally admitting that climate change is a natural phenomenon that can’t be stopped, no matter what global governance does to address it. As more people come to their senses, realizing that weather, temperature and climate are unpredictable and ever-changing, one must ask: Why are climate alarmists still making such grave demands?
At the 2019 United Nations Climate Action Summit, globalists made their demands, propping a 16-year-old girl on stage to deliver climate panic. Like a puppet, the girl insisted upon urgent global action to control carbon levels and global temperature readings.
Addressing the summit, the child demanded, “If you choose to fail us, I say we will never forgive you.” She also implied that those who disagree with her are “evil.” She even claimed that those who do not listen to her “have stolen her dreams and childhood.” Climate hysteria is an appeal to emotion, not logic and reason, and it is now being deployed as psychological terrorism onto the minds of children.
The demands of climate alarmists include central economic planning, controlling energy production of all Nations, and instilling higher taxes to supposedly control the planet's temperatures long term. These schemes will undoubtedly be used to implement continuous geo-engineering of the biosphere, unleashing new man-made consequences. In the end, climate alarmists demand an end to diversification of energy production within individual Nations to ultimately ration the planet's resources under the control of the elite. This is a globalist Ponzi scheme that should be rejected by all free and prosperous Nations.
In contrast to climate change alarmists’ demands, Jonathan Franzen of the New Yorker asks, “What if we stopped pretending? The climate apocalypse is coming. To prepare for it, we need to admit that we can’t prevent it.”
In a way, the New Yorker is right. Climate alarmists need to stop pretending that they can control temperature, weather, and climate conditions across the planet. How arrogant and delusional!
Secondly, the New Yorker doesn’t really know if a climate apocalypse is coming. This apocalypse is something we are brainwashed to expect, time and time again. However, when climate alarmists attribute every severe weather occurrence to a boogeyman called “climate change,” no real correlations are being made, nor do these postulations support the need for global control over resources and energy production. How can any scientist differentiate between a natural disaster and one that is man-made anyway? Climate change is a cult! If all this climate change is man-made and can be halted by our collective actions, what kind of world would we need to succumb to in order to please the climate alarmists? Who would get to drive vehicles and fly in planes? Who would get to live in warm homes in the winter? Only the elite and their puppets would, as resources are rationed to prevent some hypothetical climate catastrophe.
Moreover, no one can summon the collective will of billions of people. Who wants to submit to the tormented road of serfdom? This is where climate action would lead us -- to serfdom. Whether a climate catastrophe is coming or not, the New Yorker is right, we need to admit that we can’t prevent a warm front, a cool front, a tornado, a hurricane, or volcanic eruption. Why worry? Why stress over the things that are out of our control, anyway?
Before climate alarmists lecture everyone else about “saving the planet” through globalization, they should first get their lives in order and take responsibility for their own actions. For more on this topic, check out ClimateAlarmism.News.