Subscribe (free)
About NaturalNews
Contact Us
Write for NaturalNews
Media Info
Advertising Info

Breast Cancer Screening Not as Accurate or Life-Saving as Widely Believed

Monday, May 18, 2009 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer
Tags: mammograms, health news, Natural News

Most Viewed Articles

(NaturalNews) The British National Health Service has been accused of promoting the benefits of breast cancer screening without warning women of the risks, in a letter signed by 23 people and published in The Times. The letter came in response to the findings of a study conducted by researchers from the Nordic Cochrane Center of Breast Cancer and Screening, published in the British Medical Journal.

The Cochrane study concluded that the risks and benefits of breast cancer screening are far more complex than the picture presented by the NHS.

"The [NHS informational] leaflet has the authoritative title 'Breast Screening: The Facts' suggesting that the information can be trusted ... [but] it is inadequate as a basis for informed consent," lead researcher Peter Gotzsche said.

The researchers found that for every 2,000 women receiving regular breast cancer screening for 10 years, one life would be saved. At the same time, 10 women would receive unnecessary breast cancer treatment, including radiation, chemotherapy, and partial or full breast removal. Two hundred women, or one in 10, would receive a false positive on at least one test, although this would be discovered before serious treatment began.

The study also uncovered that while one in five breast cancers diagnosed is a non-invasive variety called ducal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) the NHS literature does not mention DCIS at all.

According to letter signatory Michael Baum, there is no evidence that the increase in breast cancer screening over recent years has actually led to lives being saved.

"The number of invasive breast cancers being detected is not falling, despite the number of cases picked up by screening rising dramatically," Baum said. "You would expect serious cancers to drop because the early detection means the DCIS cases are not progressing. It just doesn't add up."

Signatory and Minister of Parliament Margaret McCartney called for a reevaluation of government screening recommendations.

"It is complacent and arrogant to think we should carry on regardless with screening services," she said. "It is time we had a complete rethink."

Sources for this story include: www.timesonline.co.uk.

Join the Health Ranger's FREE email newsletter
Get breaking news alerts on GMOs, fluoride, superfoods, natural cures and more...
Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time. | Learn more...

comments powered by Disqus

Get alerted on heavy metals and pesticide test results for foods and supplements

Natural News is about to begin releasing lab test results for off-the-shelf food, supplement and pet food products, covering heavy metals, nutritive minerals, pesticides and herbicides. These details will be released exclusively to Natural News email newsletter subscribers (FREE) and will NOT be publicly posted on the website. To be alerted, join our free email newsletter now, and watch for lab test results in the weeks ahead.

Enter your email address below to subscribe to our email announcement list (but don't use gmail). Your privacy is protected and you can unsubscribe at any time. If you don't join our email list, you may never see our valuable content again via Facebook, Google or YouTube. CENSORSHIP has now reached EXTREME levels across the 'net. The truth is being suffocated. Subscribe now if you want to escape the delusional bubble of false reality being pushed by Google and Facebook.

Once you click subscribe, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free subscription.