Home
Subscribe (free)
About NaturalNews
Contact Us
Write for NaturalNews
Media Info
Advertising Info
Obesity

Anti-Obesity Activists Fight For Fat Acceptance; Here's Where They're Right and Wrong On Issues of Obesity

Friday, August 06, 2004
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)
Tags: obesity, anti-obesity, obesity myth


Most Viewed Articles
https://www.naturalnews.com/001588.html
Delicious
diaspora
Print
Email
Share

There's a war brewing over obesity. On one side you have the leaders and promoters of western medicine, who are saying that obesity is now a disease, and who are promoting all sorts of surgical procedures such as gastric bypass surgery -- as well as a wide variety of prescription drugs -- in order to combat obesity. The government says obesity is a critical public health problem, costing $100 billion a year as well as 300,000 lives each year. On the other side of this war, we have a growing group of people who are fighting against the idea that obesity is a disease, or that obesity has any health risks whatsoever. There's an association known as the NAAFA -- the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance -- which is now gaining momentum and arguing that we are living in an atmosphere of hysteria about obesity. They're saying that obesity is not unhealthy and that there is a sort of witch hunt or form of insanity taking place in blaming obesity for everything under the sun.

Let's get to the bottom of all this. I do agree with the group on one thing: that the designation of obesity as a disease is as much a marketing gimmick for the promotion of gastric bypass surgery and prescription drugs as it is any move designed to actually help people lose weight. I agree that gastric bypass surgery is something like a stomach amputation, and that it may be viewed one day as something as insane as lobotomies. I can't imagine anyone wanting to rip out part of their digestive system in order to attempt to attain a healthy body weight. On the other hand, there's a big problem with the idea that obesity has no health risks associated with it.

The fact that we are saying obesity is a health risk, or obesity is a disease, doesn't mean that the establishment is out to attack or discriminate against obese people. In some sense, this designation finally allows people who are obese to get the medical help they may need, and hopefully more of that help will go in the direction of prevention and nutritional counseling rather than surgical procedures and prescription drugs. If it does, the designation of obesity as a disease could turn out to be tremendous help to the population at large.

But this group, the NAAFA, argues that there's nothing wrong with being obese in terms of health. They say some people can be overweight for their entire lives and not end up with diabetes or heart disease. Well, that may be true, but that's certainly the exception and not the rule, and people who are overweight only end up free of diabetes if they are simultaneously extremely active, which most Americans are not. If you're overweight and follow a sedentary lifestyle, your chances of becoming diabetic are extremely high.

But now, getting back to what I agree with, the organization says that "obesity is not a disease," and I agree with that. In fact, I think many things that are labeled diseases by organized medicine are not diseases at all, but rather metabolic disorders. Obesity is certainly one of them -- so is cancer, so is osteoporosis, so is clinical depression. To me, a true "disease" is something that invades the body from the outside, such as malaria or smallpox. But these other so-called chronic diseases are really just natural effects from the nutrition and level of physical exercise being pursued by the patient.

In other words, if you want to give someone a case of osteoporosis, you don't have to expose them to pathogens -- all you have to do is make sure they drink soft drinks, consume highly acidic foods, get absolutely no natural sunlight, don't take any vitamin D supplements, and get no exercise. Within a matter of years, their bone mass with decrease until they reach a point where they might be officially diagnosed as having osteoporosis. So, I agree that obesity is not a disease, but again, neither is cancer nor diabetes, nor osteoporosis, and a long list of other so-called diseases.

Obesity is a metabolic result. It is the result of poor food choice combined with a lack of physical exercise. Note that I didn't say it is a result of "eating too much," because that's an oversimplified explanation. A thin person, like myself, can eat just as much food mass as an obese person, however it is the caloric density of those foods that differs greatly. For example, I might eat 4 or 5 huge bowls of salad in one sitting, while another person who is obese might each 4 or 5 huge bowls of ice cream in the same sitting. We each have taken up the same physical space in our stomachs, we each feel the same degree of satiation from our meal, but the difference is I may have consumed 200 calories, while the other person may have put 1500 calories into their body. In this way, obesity is not a disease of eating too much food mass -- it's the result of poor food choice and choosing foods that are high in processed carbohydrates, added sugars, and refined grains such as white flour or corn flour. Soft drinks are obviously one of the worst offenders.

I also think that this anti-obesity movement is going too far with this entire "fat acceptance stance for tolerance." In my view, they're hiding behind a lot of language that is more properly associated with the more legitimate area of racial discrimination or gender discrimination. In this country there are genuine problems with discrimination against people based on their gender and their race, and these problems are far more widespread and of a very different nature than discrimination against someone based on their body weight. Certainly, discrimination based on body weight is wrong, however, there is an element of truth to the fact that the person has the power to alter their body weight, whereas a person has no such power to alter their skin color or gender.

Thus, discrimination based on skin color or gender exists at a whole different level from that of discrimination based on body weight or body shape. Once again, that's not to say that discrimination based on obesity isn't wrong -- because I believe it is wrong -- but I also think it's inappropriate for the fat acceptance activists to borrow language from racial discrimination and use it as a shield from which they can launch their own form of tolerance activism.

My advice to anyone who is overweight or obese is the same advice that I gave myself when I found myself weighing 220 pounds with an embarrassingly large degree of body fat: do something about it. You can change your body shape by changing your food choice and your level of physical exercise. If you don't like the way society is treating you because of your body shape, you do have the power to make changes in that body shape. Once again, it doesn't make it right for other people to discriminate based on body shape, but at least this is a case where you can do something about it.


Receive Our Free Email Newsletter

Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.




About the author:Mike Adams (aka the "Health Ranger") is a best selling author (#1 best selling science book on Amazon.com) and a globally recognized scientific researcher in clean foods. He serves as the founding editor of NaturalNews.com and the lab science director of an internationally accredited (ISO 17025) analytical laboratory known as CWC Labs. There, he was awarded a Certificate of Excellence for achieving extremely high accuracy in the analysis of toxic elements in unknown water samples using ICP-MS instrumentation. Adams is also highly proficient in running liquid chromatography, ion chromatography and mass spectrometry time-of-flight analytical instrumentation.

Adams is a person of color whose ancestors include Africans and Native American Indians. He's also of Native American heritage, which he credits as inspiring his "Health Ranger" passion for protecting life and nature against the destruction caused by chemicals, heavy metals and other forms of pollution.

Adams is the founder and publisher of the open source science journal Natural Science Journal, the author of numerous peer-reviewed science papers published by the journal, and the author of the world's first book that published ICP-MS heavy metals analysis results for foods, dietary supplements, pet food, spices and fast food. The book is entitled Food Forensics and is published by BenBella Books.

In his laboratory research, Adams has made numerous food safety breakthroughs such as revealing rice protein products imported from Asia to be contaminated with toxic heavy metals like lead, cadmium and tungsten. Adams was the first food science researcher to document high levels of tungsten in superfoods. He also discovered over 11 ppm lead in imported mangosteen powder, and led an industry-wide voluntary agreement to limit heavy metals in rice protein products.

In addition to his lab work, Adams is also the (non-paid) executive director of the non-profit Consumer Wellness Center (CWC), an organization that redirects 100% of its donations receipts to grant programs that teach children and women how to grow their own food or vastly improve their nutrition. Through the non-profit CWC, Adams also launched Nutrition Rescue, a program that donates essential vitamins to people in need. Click here to see some of the CWC success stories.

With a background in science and software technology, Adams is the original founder of the email newsletter technology company known as Arial Software. Using his technical experience combined with his love for natural health, Adams developed and deployed the content management system currently driving NaturalNews.com. He also engineered the high-level statistical algorithms that power SCIENCE.naturalnews.com, a massive research resource featuring over 10 million scientific studies.

Adams is well known for his incredibly popular consumer activism video blowing the lid on fake blueberries used throughout the food supply. He has also exposed "strange fibers" found in Chicken McNuggets, fake academic credentials of so-called health "gurus," dangerous "detox" products imported as battery acid and sold for oral consumption, fake acai berry scams, the California raw milk raids, the vaccine research fraud revealed by industry whistleblowers and many other topics.

Adams has also helped defend the rights of home gardeners and protect the medical freedom rights of parents. Adams is widely recognized to have made a remarkable global impact on issues like GMOs, vaccines, nutrition therapies, human consciousness.

In addition to his activism, Adams is an accomplished musician who has released over a dozen popular songs covering a variety of activism topics.

Click here to read a more detailed bio on Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, at HealthRanger.com.

comments powered by Disqus


Natural News Wire (Sponsored Content)

Science.News
Science News & Studies
Medicine.News
Medicine News and Information
Food.News
Food News & Studies
Health.News
Health News & Studies
Herbs.News
Herbs News & Information
Pollution.News
Pollution News & Studies
Cancer.News
Cancer News & Studies
Climate.News
Climate News & Studies
Survival.News
Survival News & Information
Gear.News
Gear News & Information
Glitch.News
News covering technology, stocks, hackers, and more