BPA

FDA releases flawed study proclaiming BPA to be safe at low doses

Tuesday, February 25, 2014 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: bisphenol A, FDA, flawed study

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
The five biggest lies about Ebola being pushed by government and mass media
White House admits staging fake vaccination operation to gather DNA from the public
Why does the CDC own a patent on Ebola 'invention?'
Ultraviolet light robot kills Ebola in two minutes; why doesn't every hospital have one of these?
EXCLUSIVE: Natural News tests flu vaccine for heavy metals, finds 25,000 times higher mercury level than EPA limit for water
Irrefutable proof we are all being sprayed with poison: 571 tons of toxic lead 'chemtrailed' into America's skies every year
Truvia sweetener a powerful pesticide; scientists shocked as fruit flies die in less than a week from eating GMO-derived erythritol
Russia taking McDonald's to court, threatens countrywide shutdown
Oregon man serving prison sentence for collecting rainwater on his own property
Senator who attacked Doctor Oz over dietary supplements received over $146,000 in campaign contributions from Big Pharma mega-retailer and Monsanto
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
Healthy 12-year-old girl dies shortly after receiving HPV vaccine
HOAX confirmed: Michelle Obama 'GMOs for children' campaign a parody of modern agricultural politics
Ebola outbreak may already be uncontrollable; Monsanto invests in Ebola treatment drug company as pandemic spreads
Ben & Jerry's switches to non-GMO, Fair Trade ice cream ingredients
W.H.O. contradicts CDC, admits Ebola can spread via coughing, sneezing and by touching contaminated surfaces
Elliot Rodger, like nearly all young killers, was taking psychiatric drugs (Xanax)
BREAKING: CDC whistleblower confesses to MMR vaccine research fraud in historic public statement
Delicious
(NaturalNews) A poorly designed study with one obvious goal -- to cover up the health effects of exposure to the plastics chemical bisphenol A, or BPA -- is right now circulating the mainstream media with corresponding claims that BPA is completely safe for humans at current exposure levels, despite copious contradicting science. But a University of Massachusetts Amherst (UMA) assistant professor and several others have since come out publicly to decry this flawed study, the construct of which ignores the basic confines of legitimate science.

As recently covered by Environmental Health News (EHN) writer Brian Bienkowski, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decided to team up with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to put together a team of government scientists to investigate the safety of BPA, which the FDA has long insisted is completely safe. The project emerged in response to the publishing of multiple scientific studies in recent years illustrating both acute and chronic health effects associated with BPA exposure, findings that directly contradict the agency's longstanding position.

Not surprisingly, this new study was conducted in such a way as to avoid coming to these same conclusions, an apparently sinister plot that shows where these taxpayer-funded agencies' loyalties truly lie. Independent investigations into their work have revealed that the new research, which was published in a recent issue of the peer-reviewed journal Toxicological Sciences, is severely lacking in terms of abiding by accepted and proper scientific standards.

"Some scientists not affiliated with the study said that the findings are flawed," writes Bienkowski for EHN. "FDA scientists didn't look for all relevant health impacts, such as effects on the developing brain. Also, the experiment lasted for 90 days, so it is unknown if the rats' health was affected later in life. Some effects, such as altered glucose levels, might occur after continuing exposure."

Government BPA study had no real controls, ignored estrogenic effects of BPA

The study also lacked proper controls, say critics, as all the mice were determined to have the same levels of BPA in their blood at the conclusion of the study, regardless of whether or not they were intentionally exposed to the chemical during the actual evaluation. What this means, of course, is that the study's ultimate findings are completely meaningless, as there is no way to accurately assess how BPA affects physiology without proper controls.

"That's a problem," commented Laura Vandenberg from UMA, who completely disapproves of the way the FDA/NIH study was conducted. "When you have contamination like that, you cannot just look at the higher-dose groups and make conclusions."

Also missing from the FDA's assessment was any consideration of BPA's affects on human hormones, mainly its ability to activate estrogen receptors in the brain. Previous studies have confirmed that even low-dose exposure to BPA can alter hormone levels, especially over long periods of time -- the new FDA study on BPA, it should be noted, only evaluated the effects of BPA on rats for 90 days, which is far too short a duration to make any reasonable or logical conclusions about its safety.

"Other recent animal studies conducted at universities have linked low-dose BPA exposure to an array of health impacts, including some of the effects that the new study did not find," writes Bienkowski for EHN. "These other experiments found mammary gland abnormalities, altered male and female sexual development, changes in metabolism, insulin and glucose, impaired learning and memory, stress and obesity."

You can view this flawed FDA study as it was originally published at the following link:
http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org

http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org

Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.