North Korea vows to test more nuclear weapons, aims threats at U.S

Wednesday, February 06, 2013 by: J. D. Heyes
Tags: North Korea, nuclear weapons, testing

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
CDC issues flu vaccine apology: this year's vaccine doesn't work!
The five biggest lies about Ebola being pushed by government and mass media
Ultraviolet light robot kills Ebola in two minutes; why doesn't every hospital have one of these?
Tetanus vaccines found spiked with sterilization chemical to carry out race-based genocide against Africans
Healthy 12-year-old girl dies shortly after receiving HPV vaccine
The best way to help your body protect itself against Ebola (or any virus or bacteria)
Cannabis dissolves cancerous tumor in young infant, deemed a 'miracle baby' by physician
Ben & Jerry's switches to non-GMO, Fair Trade ice cream ingredients
Russia throws down the gauntlet: energy supply to Europe cut off; petrodollar abandoned as currency war escalates
W.H.O. contradicts CDC, admits Ebola can spread via coughing, sneezing and by touching contaminated surfaces
Monsanto's seed imperialism halted in Canada thanks to massive protests
Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself from an uncontrolled Ebola outbreak
FDA targets Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps for sharing health benefits of coconut oil
Why flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history
Chemotherapy kills cancer patients faster than no treatment at all
Governments seize colloidal silver being used to treat Ebola patients, says advocate
Flu vaccine kills 13 in Italy; death toll rises
U2's Bono partners with Monsanto to destroy African agriculture with GMOs

(NaturalNews) Stalinist North Korea warned in late January the country would conduct new nuclear weapons tests in the near future, further complicating relations with the U.S. and its South Korean ally while adding yet another element of uncertainty to an increasingly volatile part of the world.

In its most aggressive rhetoric towards Washington since Kim Jong-un took the reins of power, the North Korean military announced Jan. 24, three days after President Obama's second-term inauguration, that the tests would be forthcoming. In addition, the military; in a lengthy statement, pledged to further build up its already vast, if not largely outmoded, conventional arsenal.

The statement, released through state media by the North's National Defense Commission, Pyongyang appeared to admonish the U.N. Security Council and "repeatedly challenged the U.S. role in pushing sanctions aimed at neutralizing the goading nuclear state," MSNBC's Martin Bashir reported.

More North Korean nuke testing coming?

The move of abject defiance comes after a Security Council meeting days before in which the body unanimously adopted a resolution that tightens existing sanctions against Pyongyang while condemning a Dec. 12 rocket launch as a violation of an existing resolution. China, one of North Korea's few international allies, joined with the U.S. and other countries in supporting the new resolution (which, like previous resolutions, was toothless and ineffectual).

"The U.S. is taking the lead in encroaching upon the sovereignty of the DPRK, its allies are siding with it and the U.N. Security Council has been reduced into an organization bereft of impartiality and balance," said the defense commission's statement.

Most of the hostile language, as in the past, was directed towards Washington.

"We do not hide that a variety of satellites and long-range rockets which will be launched by the DPRK one after another and a nuclear test of higher level which will be carried out by it in the upcoming all-out action, a new phase of the anti-U.S. struggle that has lasted century after century, will target against the U.S., the sworn enemy of the Korean people," the statement said. "Settling accounts with the U.S. needs to be done with force, not with words as it regards jungle law as the rule of its survival."

The commission goes on to challenge what it said was a "more dangerous phase" in U.S. policy toward the North, insisting that only the "denuclearization" of the United States and the other nuclear powers would stop Pyongyang from pursuing its own nukes.

As expected, U.S. officials were less than enthused by the commission's statement.

"We think that would be a mistake obviously," said Glyn Davies, a special envoy to North Korea, regarding the military's vow to resume nuclear weapons testing. "We call on North Korea as does the entire international community not to engage in any further provocations."

Historically, North Korea has ignored such toothless warnings and no doubt will do so again, if its leaders feel like renewed nuclear testing is in the country's best interests.

Successive U.S. administrations, beginning with the Clinton White House in the 1990s, have been unsuccessful in deterring North Korea's nuclear ambitions.

'It's the end of life as we know it'

The Clinton administration thought it had struck a deal with Kim's father, Kim Jong-il, in October 1994, which called on the North to end construction of nuclear reactors suspected of being part of a covert nuclear weapons program in exchange for two proliferation-resistant nuclear power reactors. The U.S. was also to provide cash and resource-starved Pyongyang with fuel oil pending construction of the non-threatening reactors.

Clinton took credit for curbing the North's nuclear ambitions but in 2002, a year into the administration of George W. Bush, the North admitted it had maintained a clandestine program all along.

Though the North cannot hope to equal the United States in terms of offensive nuclear weapons capability, the country still poses a grave threat to U.S. national security nonetheless. North Korea doesn't have much infrastructure as it is, but we do, and one well-placed nuclear electromagnetic pulse strike over parts of the U.S. would be catastrophic.

Delivering a burst of electromagnetic radiation hundreds of miles above the country would wreak havoc on the nation's electrical grid; the resultant damage would cripple all electrical infrastructures.

A number of U.S. military ground, air and naval weapons systems are "hardened" against EMP strikes. But the nation's infrastructure is not.


Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...


Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source:

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.