NYT distorts GMO labeling issue, tries to make it a debate about crop yields

Monday, June 11, 2012 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: NYT, GMO, labeling

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
BACK INTO THE CLOSET: Why U.S. reporters are not allowed to write about rainbow events in nations where being gay is still condemned
Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized
A family destroyed: Six-month-old dies after clinic injects baby with 13 vaccines at once without mother's informed consent
INVESTIGATION: Three days before Dr. Bradstreet was found dead in a river, U.S. govt. agents raided his research facility to seize a breakthrough cancer treatment called GcMAF
BAM! Chipotle goes 100% non-GMO; flatly rejecting the biotech industry and its toxic food ingredients
BOMBSHELL: China and America already at war: Tianjin explosion carried out by Pentagon space weapon in retaliation for Yuan currency devaluation... Military helicopters now patrolling Beijing
ECONOMIC SLAVERY FOR ALL: While we were distracted with the Confederate flag flap, Congress quietly forfeited our entire economic future via fast-track trade authority
March Against Monsanto explodes globally... World citizens stage massive protests across 38 countries, 428 cities... mainstream media pretends it never happened
GMO crops totally banned in Russia... powerful nation blocks Monsanto's agricultural imperialism and mass poisoning of the population
SCOTUS same-sex marriage decision may have just legalized the concealed carry of loaded firearms across all 50 states, nullifying gun laws everywhere
Nearly every mass shooting in the last 20 years shares one surprising thing? and it's not guns
Vicious attack on Dr. Oz actually waged by biotech mafia; plot to destroy Oz launched after episode on glyphosate toxicity went viral
Holistic cancer treatment pioneer Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez dies suddenly; patients mourn the loss of a compassionate, innovative doctor who helped thousands heal from cancer
Pepsi drops aspartame from diet soda as consumers reject toxic sweetener
Bride of Frankenfood: Hillary Clinton pushes GMO agenda... hires Monsanto lobbyist... takes huge dollars from Monsanto
Wild eyes and bowl cuts: Why do mass shooters always share the same hair styles and crazed zombie stares?
Mind control through emotional domination: How we're all being manipulated by the "crisis of the NOW"
Genetically white woman now claims self-identify as black: If you can choose your gender, can you also choose your race? What about your species? Can a human claim to be a llama?
(NaturalNews) The American people are tired of being lied to about the ingredients that are present in the foods they eat, which is why many of them have helped launch or support grassroots efforts to require mandatory labeling of genetically-modified organisms (GMOs). But corporate agriculture interests and their lackeys in the mainstream media are desperately trying to derail the labeling movement by shifting the focus from transparency and honesty in labeling, to fairy tales about crop yields and "feeding the planet."

In one such distraction piece, the New York Times (NYT) completely bypasses the issue of honest labeling and how it is vital in any free republic, and instead focuses its readers' attention on the fact that some industry scientists and farmers believe GMOs to be superior for meeting the world's growing food needs. The same piece also claims that "farmers and scientists" are opposed to labeling because consumers will refuse to purchase labeled food.

Whether or not certain scientists and industry representatives personally believe that GMOs have agricultural merit is a non-issue, as the public has every right to know the full contents of food sold at the grocery store regardless. And yet the NYT considers these personal opinions, which contradict all independent science showing that GMOs are responsible for causing human harm, to be a valid argument against labeling initiatives.

And the argument that mandatory labeling will decrease consumer interest in foods that contain GMOs only serves as an example as to why they should be labeled. Because many people are now reporting severe allergic reactions to GMOs, for example, it is vital that a policy of full transparency be put in place so that all consumers can make informed purchasing decisions.

If GMOs are safe and beneficial, then why doesn't the industry want them labeled?

One of the absurd responses that Monsanto and its biotechnology industry counterparts give when questioned about why they oppose labeling is that GMOs are no different from natural foods. Sure, GMOs often contain embedded genes derived from animals (, or built-in insecticides (, but they are just as safe as all other food, we are told.

Monsanto is so confident of the safety of its GMOs, in fact, that it has declared human testing of GMOs to be entirely unnecessary ( "Just trust us" -- this is the extent of the "science" behind Monsanto's GMOs, most of which have never been tested by anyone other than Monsanto due to the company's proprietary patent holdings. And since most of Monsanto's own "safety testing" obviously validates the legitimacy of "Frankencrops," the agro-giant and its corporate minions can safely declare, whenever given the chance, that they are unaware of any tests showing GMOs to be unsafe.

However, numerous independent studies on GMOs have been conducted over the years, and almost all of them reveal that GMOs are questionable at best. At worst, GMOs have been shown to cause serious organ damage (, gastrointestinal problems (, sterility and other reproductive disorders (, chronic inflammation, severe allergies, cancer, and other severe health problems (

Americans should not be forced to be human guinea pigs for the massive science experiment that is GMO technology. It is vital that we stand united as one to pass GMO labeling laws at both the state and national levels to ensure freedom of food choice for all.

Sources for this article include:

Follow real-time breaking news headlines on
NYT at
Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...


Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source:

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.