screening

Study says breast screening does more harm than good

Thursday, December 15, 2011 by: Elizabeth Walling
Tags: breast cancer, screening, surgery

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
CDC issues flu vaccine apology: this year's vaccine doesn't work!
Tetanus vaccines found spiked with sterilization chemical to carry out race-based genocide against Africans
Biologist explains how marijuana causes tumor cells to commit suicide
Companies begin planting microchips under employees' skin
NJ cops bust teenagers shoveling snow without a permit
Russia throws down the gauntlet: energy supply to Europe cut off; petrodollar abandoned as currency war escalates
McDonald's in global profit free fall as people everywhere increasingly reject chemically-altered toxic fast food
Chemotherapy kills cancer patients faster than no treatment at all
U2's Bono partners with Monsanto to destroy African agriculture with GMOs
FDA targets Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps for sharing health benefits of coconut oil
Why flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history
Flu vaccine kills 13 in Italy; death toll rises
600 strains of an aerosolized thought control vaccine already tested on humans; deployed via air, food and water
The 21 curious questions we're never allowed to ask about vaccines
Italian court rules mercury and aluminum in vaccines cause autism: US media continues total blackout of medical truth
CDC admits it has been lying all along about Ebola transmission; "indirect" spread now acknowledged
Whooping cough outbreak at Massachusetts high school affected only vaccinated students
Orthorexia Nervosa - New mental disorder aimed at people who insist on eating a clean diet

Delicious
(NaturalNews) The breast cancer scare has women everywhere racing to get a mammogram in hopes that breast screening will safe their lives. But a new research report says breast screening harms as many women as it supposedly benefits. Researchers from the United Kingdom say women, who get regular mammograms, are at a high risk for false positives, meaning they will be rushed into cancer surgery for malignant cancer they don't even have.

Countless Women Subjected to Needless Breast Surgery

In 1986, breast screening was recommended for preventative care in the U.K. due to the Forrest report, which predicted screening would reduce deaths from breast cancer by one third. But criticism of breast screening has increased in recent years as research points to it being less beneficial - and possibly far more harmful - than previously thought.

James Raferty, professor of health technology assessment at the University of Southampton, led the study. He and a team of colleagues analyzed findings to determine the real results of breast screening. They found that false positives and unnecessary surgeries may make mammography more dangerous than beneficial.

Their report, published on Dec. 8 in the online version of the British Medical Journal, includes data from eight trials involving 100,000 women over the age of 50 who have had breast screening. When researchers took into account the harm of false positives and needless surgery caused by breast screening, the benefits of screening dropped to less than half what was predicted in the Forrest report.

"The meaning and implications of overdiagnosis and overtreatment need to be much better explained and communicated," researchers write in their report.

Raferty also adds, "There are lots of women around who have had surgery who (falsely) believe their lives were saved."

Health departments and cancer charities dismiss the findings and continue to insist women be subjected to annual breast cancer screening. Even though the American Cancer Society previously admitted breast screening benefits are overstated (http://www.naturalnews.com/028703_breast_can... ), they continue to push the idea that mammograms save lives. One can only wonder how much research needs to be done before these organizations get the wake up call they so desperately need.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d7627

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/dec/0...

http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncolo...

About the author:
Elizabeth Walling is a freelance writer specializing in health, nutrition and wellness. She is a strong believer in natural living as a way to improve health and prevent modern disease. She enjoys thinking outside of the box and challenging common myths about health and wellness. You can visit her blog to learn more:
www.livingthenourishedlife.com








Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.