cancer

Breast Cancer Screening Benefits Overstated

Monday, May 03, 2010 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer
Tags: breast cancer, screening, health news

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
BACK INTO THE CLOSET: Why U.S. reporters are not allowed to write about rainbow events in nations where being gay is still condemned
Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized
A family destroyed: Six-month-old dies after clinic injects baby with 13 vaccines at once without mother's informed consent
Biologist explains how marijuana causes tumor cells to commit suicide
Companies begin planting microchips under employees' skin
BAM! Chipotle goes 100% non-GMO; flatly rejecting the biotech industry and its toxic food ingredients
ECONOMIC SLAVERY FOR ALL: While we were distracted with the Confederate flag flap, Congress quietly forfeited our entire economic future via fast-track trade authority
NJ cops bust teenagers shoveling snow without a permit
Russia throws down the gauntlet: energy supply to Europe cut off; petrodollar abandoned as currency war escalates
McDonald's in global profit free fall as people everywhere increasingly reject chemically-altered toxic fast food
March Against Monsanto explodes globally... World citizens stage massive protests across 38 countries, 428 cities... mainstream media pretends it never happened
Chemotherapy kills cancer patients faster than no treatment at all
600 strains of an aerosolized thought control vaccine already tested on humans; deployed via air, food and water
Italian court rules mercury and aluminum in vaccines cause autism: US media continues total blackout of medical truth
SCOTUS same-sex marriage decision may have just legalized the concealed carry of loaded firearms across all 50 states, nullifying gun laws everywhere
The 21 curious questions we're never allowed to ask about vaccines
Vicious attack on Dr. Oz actually waged by biotech mafia; plot to destroy Oz launched after episode on glyphosate toxicity went viral
Orthorexia Nervosa - New mental disorder aimed at people who insist on eating a clean diet
Delicious
(NaturalNews) The American Cancer Society has admitted that the benefits of breast cancer screening have been overstated, even while refusing to rescind its endorsement of yearly mammograms for women over the age of 40.

In recent years, scientists have become extremely critical of U.S. health recommendations that women receive breast cancer screening every year. Screening can expose women to dangerous radiation, and current tests have high rates of false positive results either detecting benign lumps and subjecting women to unnecessary biopsies and mental anguish, or detecting slow-growing cancers that would never have posed a health threat and subjecting women to dangerous and potentially life-altering cancer treatments including chemotherapy, radiation and breast removal.

In November, the United States Preventive Service Task Force joined much of the health establishment and other First World countries in recommending that mammograms be given only once every two years, and only to women over 50.

While shying away from accepting this new recommendation, the American Cancer Society has acknowledged that the messages surrounding screening have been misleading: more screening is not always better, nor does screening always have positive consequences.

"Too often we do a disservice to women we want to help by simplifying the concepts of this disease with very simple messages," said Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. "Sometimes simple messages ... actually end up doing harm."

In spite of media portrayals, breast cancer is very rare in young women, and mammograms are better at detecting non-aggressive cancers than the more dangerous kind. Although a family history of breast cancer does increase cancer risk, most women diagnosed with the disease do not have such a family history.

Researchers are currently working to develop new, more accurate methods of cancer screening that are able to distinguish between aggressive and non-aggressive breast cancers, and that have lower false positive rates.

Sources for this story include: www.oregonlive.com

Explore more on Breast cancer by searching on GoodGopher.com, the search engine for truth seekers.
Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.