Originally published November 9 2015
Evidence of vaccine injuries memory-holed from U.S. government website
by J. D. Heyes
(NaturalNews) The federal government, perhaps at the behest of the Obama administration, has been quietly removing vaccine injury court data from a publicly reported chart that at one time was updated monthly, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson reported recently on her web site.
"In March, the federal government removed the latest vaccine injury court statistics—more than a year's worth of data—from one of its publicly reported charts," she wrote. "It was an abrupt departure from the normal practice of updating the figures monthly."
Scrubbing the latest data means the "adjudication categories by alleged vaccine" chart on the federal agency web site no longer shows the recent, dramatic increase in court victories for plaintiffs who alleged their kids were either injured seriously or killed by one or more vaccines, Attkisson wrote in late June.
She added that since January 2014, the number of flu vaccine cases that were conceded by the federal government more than doubled the cases from the previous eight years in total. However, the adjudication chart only reflected about half of current figures.
She posted these figures from the chart:
Concessions Won by Flu Shot Victims since 2006
Chart shows (through 2013): 42
Actual number (through April 2015): 88
Total Flu Shot Victims Compensated Since 2006
Chart shows (through 2013): 1091
Actual number (through April 2015): 1271
Data not being kept up-to-dateAttkission also noted that the number of cases the government has "conceded" is also on the rise, jumping some 55 percent in a single year alone. As a result of the changes to the vaccine safety web site, however, these trends are not reflected in the current "adjudication" chart.
"Since its inception in 2013, the 'adjudication categories by alleged vaccine' chart included monthly, updated totals," she wrote. "But shortly after publishing the March 2015 chart, the government removed the 2015 and 2014 data, reverting back to outdated statistics from 2013."
She notes that the chart appears on the government vaccine court web site, which is managed by Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), an agency that falls under the Department of Health and Human Services.
The court is highly unorthodox, as is the manner in which the government handles vaccine injury cases. The government acts on behalf of Big Pharma vaccine makers instead of the taxpaying general public to defend the pharmaceutical firms against alleged victims. Financial damages are not paid out by Big Pharma; they are actually paid via fees collected from patients on every dose of vaccine, including the vaccines that actually harm people.
The HRSA told Attkisson that Big Pharma's vaccine makers did not have influence over the decision to begin displaying old data. Officials with the agency told her that it reverted as a way to sync up with a statistic that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides for the same chart, which is only current to 2013. Aren't you glad our government employees are working so hard to keep info up-to-date?
Vaccine injury goes global"An internal decision was made to ensure that all internal data was consistent...and to update [the chart] only when all relevant data was available," said HRSA in a statement.
Attkisson further reported, "(Please note that while the government has stopped posting the most recent adjudication information on its public website, it provided the statistics to me upon request.)"
She further noted that only about one injury case for every million doses of vaccine ends up in the special vaccine court. That said, adverse injury occurs more frequently, according to vaccine labels. She said that when the information is accurate, it serves as a good measure to spot trends.
Speaking of which, we reported in January on a global trend of vaccine injury from multiple locations around the world that barely caused a ripple in the overcrowded, usually banal American mainstream media.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml