Originally published February 27 2015
Same government that says unvaccinated children can spread disease insists genetically altered open-air crops cannot spread genetic pollution
by Jonathan Benson, staff writer
(NaturalNews) The scandalous duplicity of the federal government on important issues like vaccines (unvaccinated children are a threat to the vaccinated, so everyone get vaccinated!) and genetically modified crops (they're perfectly safe and don't threaten non-GM crops in any way, so plant away!) reveals just how deeply special interests have penetrated the ranks of our nation's so-called leadership.
With the Obama Administration making its voice heard on the vaccine issue -- Obama, who in 2008 said vaccine science is "inconclusive," recently told America in response to the alleged measles outbreak that "there is every reason to get vaccinated" -- the clear message being sent to the public is that the government makes up the rules as it goes along to suit the agenda of its controllers.
It doesn't matter if these rules contradict each other -- if the government says it's good, but later says it's bad, then you just have to agree or else be labeled a domestic terrorist. When it concerns vaccines, there's no threat of the live virus spreading from the recently vaccinated to the unvaccinated. But if you're unvaccinated, you're a risk to everyone, even if you don't actually have any disease.
This is because vaccines are 100% safe and absolutely necessary to prevent disease outbreaks, according to the government, even when science shows that many disease outbreaks are caused by vaccinated individuals and spread only among the vaccinated. In no way are vaccines a threat, insist authorities, and anything to the contrary is "anti-vaxxer" propaganda.
GMOs are safe, and so are vaccines -- we're from the government, so trust us! Meanwhile, this same government is adamant that genetically modified organisms, which have been shown to spread their pollen and contaminate non-GM and organic crops, are somehow not a threat to other crops (even though they are). Conceptually, GM crops should be the same as unvaccinated children, if you follow the narrative -- both can spread infectious disease (or contaminating pollen), right?
In a logical world, this would be the case. But in the world of American fascism, left is right and up is down, as long as it suits the agenda. Vaccines are only effective if everyone gets them, and it doesn't matter if they contain live viruses, because only the unvaccinated are a threat. And GMOs, even though their genetic pollution is turning up all around the world, even in countries where they're banned, aren't a threat at all.
"Numerous scientific studies indicate that children who receive a live virus vaccination can shed the disease and infect others for weeks or even months afterwards," said Leslie Manookian, documentary filmmaker and producer of The Greater Good, a documentary highlighting a lack of clinical trial data comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.
"Thus, parents who vaccinate their children can indeed put others at risk. ... Vaccine failure and failure to acknowledge that live virus vaccines can spread disease have resulted in an increase in outbreaks of infectious disease in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. CDC should instruct physicians who administer vaccinations to inform their patients about the risks posed to others by those who've been recently vaccinated."
At the end of the day, measles is hardly a threat. Children who contract it early tend to get over it relatively quickly, much like with chickenpox, and earn lifelong immunity as a result. Should we really be risk major nerve, brain and vital organ damage from a vaccine that doesn't really work, and that in some cases causes permanent health damage?
Sources for this article include:
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml