Originally published August 10 2014
Employee Vaccine Mandates: Observations of a Vaccine Rights Attorney
by Alan Phillips, J.D.
(NaturalNews) The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' "Healthy People 2020" initiative states a goal of vaccinating 90% of the nation's healthcare workers with the influenza vaccine annually by 2020, a goal well underway. A separate DHHS goal aims to vaccinate 80% of all U.S. employees annually with the influenza vaccine by 2020.
There's no light at the end of this tunnel. With literally hundreds of new vaccines in the works, there will always be another person to get a vaccine, and another vaccine to give each person. Taxpayers, through state and federal governments, pay: 1) Billions of dollars in subsidies to pharmaceutical companies for vaccines, 2) Our state and federal representatives to pass laws mandating more vaccines for children and adults while restricting access to vaccine exemptions, 3) For vaccines purchased by government health agencies, and 4) Over $100 million annually to compensate vaccine injury and death victims and their families. Vaccine manufacturers have no liability, yet these same companies routinely engage in criminal behavior that routinely results in criminal fines in the 100's of millions of dollars--a billion dollars in some cases.
We can expect more or the same unless and until we become legislatively active and get laws passed giving us the right to make informed vaccine choices. Meanwhile, here's a look at what's happening around the country with employee influenza vaccine mandates.
What does the Science Say?
First, are policies mandating flu shots for employees scientifically justified? Multiple peer-reviewed medical studies and other mainstream medical sources tell us that influenza vaccines don't work. In fact, the research reveals that they may actually lower protection and cause an increase in flu-like illnesses, while studies favoring the vaccine have been shown by independent sources to be fatally flawed. Meanwhile, the very real, serious vaccine-induced injuries and vaccine deaths are downplayed or ignored altogether. Over 60% of recent government vaccine injury and death payouts have been for death and disability caused by influenza vaccines, more than all other vaccines combined, and federal officials have admitted that 90-99% of serious vaccine adverse events never even get reported in the first place. So, the origins of influenza vaccine policies have nothing to do with public health. We should be concerned about any mandate imposing on our personal health choices generally, but especially one aggressively promoted and forcibly applied that is based on a clearly false pretense such as the influenza vaccine campaigns. To understand what's going on in the vaccine world, you have to understand medical politics. Vaccines are a growing multi-billion dollar international industry. Ironically, concerns about the underlying corruption and politics won't help healthcare workers get an exemption, because hospital administrators, for example, with respect to healthcare worker influenza vaccine mandates, are just not in a position to debate the science when money is involved. Rather, these are points for our state representatives, in a face-to-face meeting if you want them to actually see or hear and respond to your concerns.
What Does the Law Say?
Several sources have claimed that hospitals must vaccinate 90% of their employees to avoid losing up to 2.5% of Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements, which could be a "make-it-or-break-it" proposition for many hospitals, financially. However, applicable regulations require only that hospitals report healthcare workers influenza vaccine data, they do not have a minimum vaccination rate requirement. This may be why many hospitals have yet to implement strict influenza vaccine mandates, but more have been doing so with each passing year in recent years. Regardless, the implementation of influenza vaccine mandates for healthcare professionals is increasing, and is often pursued aggressively, with many hospitals naively seeking 100% compliance from their employees.
Meanwhile, most state exemption laws apply to students, not employees, so most U.S. employees don't have a state exemption law they can use to refuse vaccines required for work. But employers are required, in effect, to provide an exemption once one is properly requested, under federal law. Some of the applicable federal law is discussed below.
What's Really Happening?
Over the past 3-4 years, I've helped over 300 healthcare workers from New England to Hawaii avoid mandatory vaccines in the workplace, and that has given me some unique insights. One medical doctor reported having 4 patients that developed Guillaine Barre Syndrome (GBS) from the flu shot; 3 of them died. This is a far cry from some health officials' "one in a million" claims. Nor is this an isolated case; many doctors report multiple GBS cases in their practices. And death, while perhaps a rare occurrence in terms of the percentage of vaccines administered, is nevertheless a common occurrence. The severe adverse events of influenza vaccines are disturbingly misrepresented by public health officials, and no one can tell you your risk--whether or not you will be the next vaccine victim (unless you refuse the vaccine, which is the only time they can tell you with a high level of certainty that you won't).
Anecdotal reports suggest that it is difficult for hospital employees to get a vaccine exemption. Nurses from different parts of the country have reported that their hospital systems received over 1,000 exemption requests, more than 1,500 in one instance; yet, hospital administrators bragged about allowing only four exemptions in one instance, and few to none in other cases. So, this is one exemption arena that can be difficult to navigate on your own.
While every situation is ultimately unique, some broad consistencies have stood out amongst my healthcare worker clients and their hospital employers. First, the vast majority of hospitals implement policies that violate federal law; they are overly restrictive in their zealous effort to maximize vaccine rates. Some of the most common unlawful policy provisions include: 1) Requiring a letter from a member of the clergy for religious exemptions, 2) Requiring employees to sign a statement saying they agree with "facts" with which the employee disagrees, 3) Openly identifying unvaccinated employees--for example, with colored dots on their name badges, and 4) Requiring unvaccinated employees to wear a face mask at all times during flu season. How to deal with these unlawful policies is another question, as hospital administrators are not likely to make policy changes based on their employees' objections or opinions about the law.
Another alarming consistency is the large percentage of hospitals that have either recently been bought out, are in the process or being bought out, or are about to be bought out. That is, there is a rapid consolidation of hospitals going on throughout the country. While the underlying agenda is not entirely clear to this author, one obvious consequence is that decision-making authority is moving up; fewer and fewer people are gaining control of more and more hospital staff and patients. Many other industries have been experiencing rapid consolidations as well, while state and federal governments have been assuming more and more power, stepping over Constitutional boundaries as well. We are in the midst of a rapid restructuring of our society as we once knew it, and the result so far is a diminishing of individual autonomy and control over our lives. We should be very concerned about where this is all heading, and what we can do to reverse this transformation as soon as possible.
One disturbing example of this in the hospital world is that some hospital administrators refuse to revise their policies, to bring them into compliance with federal law, when confronted with the fact that their policies are unlawful, despite at least implicitly admitting that their policies are unlawful by granting my clients the exemption without the client having to comply fully with the unlawful policy. I have never had a hospital attorney argue that the hospital policy is lawful in such instances, but sometimes, hospital administrators will replace one unlawful policy with another unlawful policy in an effort to stave off the "unlawful" claim without actually implementing an unlawful policy that would risk having to allow more vaccine exemptions. But the risk from these shots, which offer little if any protection, is permanent disability and death. So, it's clear that the nation's healthcare system is pretty severely dysfunctional. This assertion was profoundly underscored in June of 2014, when the CDC's vaccine safety research was exposed as flawed and falsified in a peer-reviewed medical journal. This journal article was an amazing step forward toward exposing the truth about vaccines, but it will take a lot more than this to heal the system.
I see a national trend of hospitals moving to more restrictive medical exemption policies. For example, an egg allergy used to be a commonly accepted basis for receiving a medical exemption in the workplace, but the trend is toward allowing medical exemptions only when there is a history of anaphylactic shock from a vaccine or Guillaine Barre Syndrome (GBS) within six weeks of a vaccine. One nurse had letters from three medical doctors each presenting a different medical basis for an exemption, but the employer still said "get the shot or you're fired." Equally disturbing, pregnancy is increasingly rejected as a medical basis for refusing a flu vaccine. It may be possible to mount a legal challenge against employers in these situations, but ultimately, medical exemptions may boil down to a battle of the experts--theirs against yours, and with all other things being equal, public policy, which favors vaccines, may determine the outcome.
While state exemption laws usually don't apply (MD, NH and ME are exceptions), federal civil rights law requires employers to "reasonably accommodate" their employees' religious beliefs and practices. It is critical to understand that this law is not about "religion" as most of us think of it, but rather, it concerns how the law defines 'religion' for legal purposes. A complete explanation is beyond the scope of this article, but in brief, it does not matter whether or not you belong to any religious organization at all, or what your religion is if you do belong to one. In fact, there is even a category of moral and ethical beliefs you could hold as an atheist that are protected religious beliefs. So, you needn't discount the possibility of a religious exemption just because you're not a Christian Scientist, for example. However, most employees run into trouble when they write their own statement of religious beliefs opposed to vaccines, because the law on that point is just not consistent with most people's common sense approach to the task. For example, vaccine safety and effectiveness issues are, legally, matters of science and medicine, and will cause a religious exemption request to be rejected. So while the scope of protected religious beliefs is quite broad, employee religious exemptions are tricky with respect to what specific beliefs qualify. For this reason, getting support from a knowledgeable attorney is advisable. It's hard to come back later, after your exemption request is rejected, and say, "Oops--what I really meant to say was..."
Where Do We Go From Here?
There are two broad areas of concern on this issue: Current policy and law, and future policy and law. Regarding the latter, while some states such as Colorado mandate vaccines for healthcare workers (though in most states, it's the employer, and not state law, that mandates employee vaccines), Oregon has a law prohibiting hospitals from mandating influenza vaccines for their employees. Where the rubber meets the road on this issue is primarily in the state legislatures. In recent months, there have been as many as 100 or more vaccine bills pending in over 30 states, and most of those bills, if they become law, would advance a highly questionable pro-vaccine policy. So, if you want the right to make an informed choice, you'll need to persuade your state representatives to pass laws giving you that right. The more we allow our government to control our healthcare practices, the more opportunity there is for industry to influence that control to its benefit, while our health takes a back seat to those private agendas. Regarding the former--current policy and law--it is critical to get reliable information about your rights and how best to exercise them, and to understand what your options are if you do not get your employer's cooperation. For example, with federal civil rights law, you can't sue your employer even if you want to, unless you first file a "charge" with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency tasked with enforcing anti-discrimination laws in the workplace. Since there's no cost for filing a charge, this option provides a potentially powerful tool for employees to enforce their rights. On a final note, there's no need to be concerned about being an "at will" employee who can be fired at any time. While such employees may be fired for essentially no reason, they cannot be fired for an unlawful reason. So, requesting an exemption is not at all likely to result in your termination. But getting a vaccine could "terminate" your job if you are among those who experience a severe vaccine reaction, or even your life. Just one of more than 120 U.S. law firms that handle vaccine injury and death cases lists 166 cases over four years that includes nine deaths. Most of them are influenza vaccine GBS and death cases.
Alan Phillips, J.D., is a "Vaccine Rights" Attorney who counsels clients and attorneys nationally on vaccine exemptions and waivers for school, college, work, in the military, for immigration, in child custody disputes, and international travel; and who assists vaccine legislative activists nationally. For more information, see www.vaccinerights.com.
 U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, HealthyPeople.gov, 2020 Topics and Objectives, Objectives, Section IID-12.9, http://www.healthypeople.gov
 U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, HealthyPeople.gov, 2020 Topics and Objectives, Objectives, Section IID-12.5, http://www.healthypeople.gov
 "More Than 270 Vaccines in Biopharmaceutical Pipeline Offer Hope to Prevent/Treat Wide Array of Diseases," Yahoo News, http://finance.yahoo.com
 See, e.g.,
a) Financing Immunizations, National Network for Immunization Information, http://www.immunizationinfo.org and
b) "Nation's preparedness for health threats will be reviewed," The Washington Post, December 2, 2009, http://www.washingtonpost.com
 For a list of important pending vaccine bills, see the National Vaccine Information Center Advocacy Portal at www.nvicadvocacy.org. For how much we pay our state legislators, see "How much are your legislators paid?" The Washington Post, August 23, 2013, http://www.washingtonpost.com
 See Note a.
 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, Statistics Reports, http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreports.html
 See, e.g.:
a) "Public Citizen Study: Pharmaceutical Industry Is Biggest Defrauder of the Federal Government Under the False Claims Act," http://www.pharmpro.com
b) "GlaxoSmithKline to pay $3 billion fine after pleading guilty to healthcare fraud - the biggest in U.S. history," MailOnline, http://www.dailymail.co.uk and
c) "Johnson & Johnson to pay $2 billion for false marketing," CNN Money, http://money.cnn.com
 See., e.g.:
a) Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults, http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab001269.html
b) Vaccine News and Commentary from the University of Pennsylvania Centers for Bioethics, http://blog.vaccineethics.org citing 75 Fed. Reg. 35497 (June 10, 2010)
c) "Flu Shots, Fosamax and Pharmaceutical Fakery: The Common Use of Misleading Statistics in the Medical Literature," Gary G. Kohls, M.D., Dec. 3, 2011, http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org
d) National Vaccine Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes, September 13-14, 2011, APPENDIX B: OSHA Position Statement, as submitted by Mr. Borwegen, representative of the Service Employees International Union, http://www.nvic.org
e) What, in Fact, Is the Evidence That Vaccinating Healthcare Workers against Seasonal Influenza Protects Their Patients? A Critical Review, Int J Family Med. 2012; 2012: 205464, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502850/.
Influenza: marketing vaccine by marketing disease, BMJ 2013;346:f3037, http://www.beyondconformity.org.nz May 16, 2013
f) Study: Getting flu shot 2 years in a row may lower protection, CIDRAP, March 1, 2013, http://www.cidrap.umn.edu
 See, e.g.:
a) "Government Pays Damages to Vaccine Victims: Flu Shot Most Dangers with GBS and Death Settlements," http://healthimpactnews.com, Health Impact News Daily, August 5, 2014; and
b) Client Compensation for Vaccine Injuries; Maglio, Christopher & Toale, just one of over 120 U.S. law firms that prosecute vaccine injury and death claims, http://www.mctlawyers.com/vaccine-injury/cases/
 See, e.g.:
a) Less than 1%, according to Barbara Fisher, citing former FDA Commissioner David Kessler, 1993, JAMA, in the Statement of the NVIC.
b) Less than 10%, according to KM Severyn, R.Ph., Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily News, May 28, 1993. (Vaccine Policy Institute, 251 Ridgeway Dr., Dayton, OH 45459)
c) 10%, according to the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), Fact Sheet on Mandatory Vaccines at http://www.aapsonline.org/testimony/mandvac.htm.
 Operational Guidance documents, CMS Resources for NHSN Users, CMS Requirements, National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/cms/. The four listed/linked documents that concern hospital reporting of Healthcare Personnel influenza vaccination data are: a) Operational Guidance for Acute Care Hospitals, b) Operational Guidance for Ambulatory Surgery Centers, c) Operational Guidance for Long-term Acute Care Facilities, and d) Operational Guidance for Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities).
 See, e.g., footnote 10b, just one U.S. firm's list of settlements in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), which lists 9 deaths out of 166 cases over a four year period, or 5.4% of the claims.
 Methodological Issues and Evidence of Malfeasance in Research Purporting to Show Thimerosal in Vaccines is Safe, BioMed Research International, http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/247218/
 See, e.g., the National Vaccine Information Center's Advocacy Portal at www.nvicadvocacy.org.
 I recommend a face-to-face meeting; state officials rarely respond to individual letters and emails. Have a well-referenced, bullet-point list of facts and a clear objective. For help with vaccine legislative activism, contact the author at www.vaccinerights.com and see the NVIC Advocacy Portal at www.nvicadvocacy.org.
 See Note b.
About the author:
Alan Phillips, Vaccine Rights Attorney
[email protected], 1-828-575-2622
Vaccine Rights (www.vaccinerights.com)
Alan Phillips, Vaccine Rights Attorney
[email protected], 1-828-575-2622
Vaccine Rights (www.vaccinerights.com)
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml