Originally published April 12 2014
Center for Food Safety sues to force USDA to explain why it approved genetically modified alfalfa
by J. D. Heyes
(NaturalNews) A food safety organization has filed suit in federal court in a bid to force the U.S. Department of Agriculture to hand over documents in court that could explain why the federal agency approved GM alfalfa despite several concerns about its environmental safety.
The organization, the Washington-based Center for Food Safety, says that the USDA could have been pressured by agri-business and bio-ag giant Monsanto to approve its Roundup Ready alfalfa, which the company says is designed to withstand a number of applications of herbicide.
"USDA determined Monsanto's Roundup Ready alfalfa posed significant environmental and economic harms and initially proposed placing restrictions on it. Yet the agency went ahead and granted full unrestricted approval one month later," Andrew Kimbrell, executive director for the Center for Food Safety, said in a prepared statement. "Did the White House intervene? Did Monsanto pressure the agency? The fact is we don't know, and unless the court orders USDA to hand over these documents we may never know."
'Nothing wrong with our GM alfalfa In a statement emailed to the Los Angeles Times, Monsanto dismissed the organization's characterization of the GM alfalfa.
"Many thousands of farmers across the U.S. currently grow Roundup Ready alfalfa, corn, soybeans, cotton, sugar beets and canola," the company said. "Each of these crops was subjected to thorough scientific review by three separate federal agencies before reaching the market; none presents the types of risks CFS alleges."
Alfalfa is the fourth-most common crop grown in the U.S., behind corn, soybeans and wheat, in that order. A legume, alfalfa is a key element of feed for dairy cows and is a major ingredient in dietary supplements and herbal medicines. In addition, the U.S. exports tons of alfalfa annually.
The opposition to GM alfalfa centers around concerns that it will cross-contaminate traditional alfalfa fields, since the crop is pollinated by bees and other insects. That would harm organic farmers and exporters to countries where GMO foods and crops are restricted or banned.
The USDA, some years ago, echoed similar concerns in an analysis that was presented in court. That concern appears to have abated, however; in 2011, the bureaucracy gave its blessing to unrestricted cultivation of GM alfalfa.
As further reported by the Times:
The Center for Food Safety said it hopes to obtain 1,179 documents from the USDA that could shed light on how it made its decision. The group said it has tried unsuccessfully to garner the documents through the Freedom of Information Act.
Roundup Ready alfalfa was developed by Monsanto and Forage Genetics, an alfalfa seed maker owned by Land O'Lakes Inc.
Other GM crops opposed for the same reason> The center has gone toe-to-toe with other companies regarding concerns over cross-contamination by other GM crops, as well as concern about chemicals.
On March 11, the group published a statement noting that the USDA had received more than 400,000 public comments opposing Dow AgroSciences' application seeking approval of controversial genetically engineered corn and soybean varieties that are resistant to the hazardous herbicide 2,4-D.
"Farmers are on the front lines of this potential chemical disaster," said Lisa Griffith of the National Family Farm Coalition. "Losing crops means they lose wages, seeds for future plantings and markets, which also stresses their communities."
Adds Karri Stroh, Executive Director of the Northern Plains Sustainable Agriculture Society, "Our farmer members raise a variety of certified crops, including organic soybeans, fruit and vegetables, that are highly sensitive to 2,4-D. If Dow's new 2,4-D seeds are approved and planted, and 2,4-D use surges across the country, those crops and the markets that depend on them will suffer tremendous losses. Those of us who live in farm country know that drift happens."
Sources for this article includes:
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml