Originally published February 16 2006
Royalties suit against Google seeks $5 billion in damages
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
In New York's Eastern district, Rates Technology is suing for $5 billion in damages from Google for unpaid royalties stemming from a patent infringement lawsuit.
Rates Technology, a little-known patent-holding company with a history of filing suits against large technology companies, said it will seek $5 billion in damages from Google based on unpaid royalties from a patent infringement lawsuit RTI filed against Google in New York.
RTI is suing Google in U.S. District Court in New York's Eastern District for infringement of patent 5,425,085, which governs the routing of VoIP calls in Google Talk, a VoIP and instant-messaging application.
RTI, based in Smithtown, New York, is also suing Google based on another patent, 5,519,769, which relates to inventions for minimizing the cost of telephone calls.
The company is seeking an injunction against Google for all commercial activity pertaining to Google Talk.
"We believe the lawsuit is without merit and we will defend against it vigorously," said Google spokesman Steve Langdon.
- ADVERTISEMENT In the past two years several companies, including network equipment suppliers, software developers, and application services companies, have added VoIP capabilities.
RTI reportedly has patent infringement lawsuits pending with Lucent Technologies, Microsoft, Mitel, Cablevision Systems, Alcatel, Vonage Holdings, and Avaya.
Other companies reported to be on RTI's target list include Cisco Systems, Nortel Networks, and Huawei.
Mitel Networks was reportedly sued for $945 million, while Alcatel was sued for $1.15 billion.
RTI is also reportedly in discussions with eBay about Skype's alleged infringement of RTI's patents.
There are few records of the company's involvement in VoIP technology or services.
Companies with the sole purpose of purchasing and suing over patents have emerged, which has prompted calls in some circles for patent reform.
But obtaining a patent from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and getting a court to say the patent is enforceable are very different things.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml