Originally published February 13 2006
Congress concludes Bush's justification of spying was weak
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
The research arm of the U.S. Congress has found that the Bush administration's justification "conflicts with existing law and hinges on weak legal arguments." Democratic lawmakers and advocates are calling for hearings to halt the program.
The US Congress's research arm has concluded that the Bush administration's justification for eavesdropping without warrants "conflicts with existing law and hinges on weak legal arguments," The Washington Post reported Saturday.
"The Congressional Research Service's report rebuts the central assertions made recently by (President George W.) Bush and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales about the president's authority to order secret intercepts of telephone and email exchanges between people inside the United States and their contacts abroad," the Post reported.
The findings have prompted Democratic lawmakers and civil liberties advocates to repeat calls for Congress to conduct hearings on the monitoring program and attempt to halt it.
"It appears unlikely that a court would hold that Congress has expressly or (implicitly) authorized the NSA electronic surveillance operations here," the authors of the report wrote, according to the Post.
The administration's legal justification "does not seem to be ...
A 2002 Bush order enabled the National Security Agency (NSA) to monitor, without a court warrant, international telephone calls and the electronic mail of US citizens with suspected ties to Al-Qaeda.
Domestic spying is a sensitive issue for many Americans who are proud of their civil liberties.
Similar revelations about domestic spying led to legislation in the 1970s that allows wiretapping but requires government agencies to obtain a special court warrant for it.
However, in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, Bush approved the mass wiretap program under which the NSA could conduct domestic spying without a court warrant.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml