Originally published February 4 2006
File sharing sites must shut down or go legit
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
Morpheus and other file-sharing sites like Kazaa and Grokster are facing shutting down or cleaning up after a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision last summer. Grokster is pursuing a copyright-friendly file-sharing service.
Weeks before the original Napster shut down for good in 2001, Internet users were flocking to alternative song-swapping programs.
Nearly 20 million people used Morpheus in its first four months, for example, to trade music and other files for free online.
But the man behind Morpheus was worried.
Michael Weiss figured popularity could bring its own perils.
As he feared, the notoriety led Hollywood studios and recording companies to sue Weiss' StreamCast Inc. for copyright infringement.
It was part of the entertainment industry's wider effort to contain Morpheus and other Napster clones such as Kazaa and Grokster from taking up where Napster left off.
Now, like Napster founder Shawn Fanning before them, Weiss and other file-sharing barons are facing their own day of reckoning after a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision last summer.
* As Bank Jobs Go Abroad, Are Records at Risk?
Over the last four months, several Napster heirs have shut down and others are contemplating what they once couldn't abide doing business by the entertainment industry's rules to survive.
"It's better to focus the company's energy on creating new technologies."
StreamCast hasn't shut down Morpheus, but the company recently approached the entertainment industry to pursue talks about settling a lawsuit against the company, according to court documents.
Wayne Rosso, who built a reputation criticizing the recording industry as head of Grokster Ltd., is also pursuing a decidedly more cordial relationship with music labels as he prepares to launch a copyright-friendly file-sharing service.
"We always knew that this free trading of all this copyright material couldn't go on.
Such capitulation was once unheard of among the file-sharing operators who lobbied against Hollywood and the recording industry.
They billed themselves as defenders of technological innovation who shouldn't be held liable because some people used their software for piracy.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml