Originally published February 4 2006
Soldiers could greatly benefit from the advance of fuel cell batteries
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
Strategypage.com discusses how fuel cells could lighten the loads that soldiers have to carry, as many who operate complex technological devices often carry 30 pounds of batteries on their packs, which would become considerably less heavy with the advent of fuel cell batteries, which are much lighter and longer lasting.
Soldiers are sometimes carrying more batteries than bullets into combat.
For some infantry operations, especially those lasting 72 hours or longer, troops are required to haul up to 30 pounds of batteries.
Special Forces are particularly hard hit by this, as they often have to go in by foot, to avoid detection, and set up a surveillance operation that consume a lot of batteries.
The only likely solution is fuel cells.
The U.S. Air Force has started using these to replace electricity generators in some of their bases.
This is a field test of the technology, but if the fuel cell devices prove reliable, the U.S. Army will equip its troops with smaller versions of fuel cells
For example, the typical 30 pound load of batteries could be replaced with a six pound fuel cell (plus another six pounds of fuel.) The army is planning to use fuel cells that run off small cartridges of methanol, which are much lighter to ship, and carry, than batteries, and deliver much more electricity per pound than conventional batteries.
The lightweight fuel cells are expected to show up in the civilian market in the next few years.
They will initially be expensive (several times the cost of a comparable gasoline powered generator), but the intended market, initially, will be backpackers, and the many soldiers who buy additional equipment with their own money.
Shortly after that, the militarized fuel cells should be in service.
This technology had been in development for over a decade, and is not considered likely to get derailed at the last minute with some unforeseen technical glitch.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml