Originally published September 27 2005
Study suggests "no real improvement" in treatment of prostate cancer over last decade
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
Health and Age reports that the improvement in prostate cancer survival rates over the last decade has mostly stemmed from a redefinition of the scale used to evaluate prostate cancer rather than any significant improvements in treatment or early detection, according to University of Connecticut researchers.
An evaluation study suggests that it is reclassification - rather than real improvements - that has led to recent increases in survival in prostate cancer.
In the past decade, there has been a welcome improvement in prostate cancer survival.
But how much of this is linked to changes in diagnostics and how much to better treatment?
To find out, a team at the University of Connecticut had a look back at samples from 1,858 men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1990 and 1992.
They had an experienced pathologist grade the tumors by the Gleason number, a measure of how likely it is the tumor will spread.
The scale goes from 2 to 10 and it's unusual, these days, for a tumor to be graded less than five.
The results showed that there has been a real shift in evaluation of tumors.
The original average Gleason score for these tumors was 5.95 and now it is 6.8.
Over half the specimens, when re-examined, were given a higher score than they had originally.
It's quite possible this trend has led to an improvement in the survival figures that is more apparent than real.
All cases of prostate cancer seem more dangerous than previously, so surviving them seems, perhaps, more significant than it really is.
Related to this is a possible issue around over-diagnosis and over-treatment of prostate cancer.
Clearly all cases must be taken seriously.
But it is still true that many men diagnosed with the disease may not require treatment and having such treatment may have an adverse effect on quality of life without bringing real health benefit.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml