Originally published July 31 2005
Health experts discuss environmental, health impact of meat
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
Not only can meat affect the health of those who consume it, it can also affect the health of everyone else through its industrial production, according to researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, as discussed on their website.
In an article published in the latest edition of the journal Public Health Nutrition, Polly Walker, MD, MPH, Robert S. Lawrence, MD, and others from the Center for a Livable Future (CLF) at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health reviewed the health, environmental and societal ramifications of industrialized meat production and nutrition of a high-meat diet.
An accompanying review by Australian researchers Anthony J. McMichael and Hilary J. Bambrick noted that the CLF paper "breaks important new ground," in part, because "their exploration of the spectrum of health consequences extends to considering the collateral damage to the environment ('externalities') and the resultant health risks."
"For millions of people threatened with malnutrition, improving access to nutrient-rich animal source foods is an easy way to improve nutritional status," said Walker.
"But meat is also high in saturated fat.
The prevalence of industrial methods of producing animals for food in the United States and increasingly throughout the world is, in part, to satisfy the growing demand for meat.
However, the production methods themselves pose many public health threats.
The article cites the extensive use of pesticides, feed that includes animal tissues, arsenic and antibiotics as well as significant waste disposal issues that affect industry workers, rural communities and consumers of the meat products.
The solutions offered by Walker include encouraging sustainable agricultural practices; working to implement the USDA Dietary Guidelines that encourage diets lower in meat and saturated fat and higher in vegetables; creating a regulatory framework that captures the externalities of current meat production, such as environmental, social and health impacts; ending commodity subsidies that cripple local agricultural economies around the world; and raising awareness of food production issues among public health communities.
Walker and her colleagues conclude that public health professionals should lead in defining the connections between food and the health of the public, the health of the food system and the health of the ecosystem.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml