Originally published June 7 2005
Bush administration appeals for its ability to conduct secret searches of user data from ISPs
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
The Bush administration is attempting to get a federal appeals court to restore its ability to obtain information about customers or subscribers from Internet Service Providers (ISPs). U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero of New York last year blocked the government from conducting secret searches of communications records, as a result of a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and an unnamed internet provider who received a message from the FBI to release user information. The letter from the FBI contained a gag order, which prevented the recipient from disclosing the existence of the letter, and was so broad the ACLU filed the suit under seal. Because a 1986 law (enhanced by the 2001 Patriot Act), allowed the government to bar legal challenges, and place gag orders on affected businesses, ACLU representatives say most affected people don't challenge the orders because they don't know they can.
The Bush administration asked a federal appeals court Friday to restore its ability to compel Internet service providers to turn over information about their customers or subscribers as part of its fight against terrorism.
The legal filing with the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New York comes amid a debate in Congress over renewal of the Patriot Act and whether to expand the FBI's power to seek records without the approval of a judge or grand jury.
U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero of New York last year blocked the government from conducting secret searches of communications records, saying the law that authorized them wrongly barred legal challenges and imposed a gag order on affected businesses.
The ruling came in a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and an internet access firm that received a national security letter from the FBI demanding records.
The administration said the judge's ruling was off the mark because the company did mount a legal challenge to the demand for records.
"Yet in this very case, the recipient of the national security letter did precisely what the NSLs supposedly prevent recipients from doing," the filing said.
The law's ban on disclosing that such a letter has been received also is appropriate because of legitimate security concerns, the government said.
The ACLU and the firm filed the lawsuit to challenge the law's constitutionality on the grounds that it doesn't contain such a provision, he said.
The ban on disclosure is so broad that the ACLU initially filed the suit under seal and negotiated for weeks on a version that could be released to the public.
Previously censored material released several months after Marrero's ruling included innocuous material the government wanted withheld, the ACLU said, including the phrase "national security" and this sentence from a statement by an FBI agent: "I am a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation."
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml