Originally published June 11 2005
Diabetics could stop skin-pricking with new non-invasive blood glucose meter
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
A new blood glucose-testing device from Glucon Inc. could mean the end of skin-pricking and drawing blood to measure glucose levels in diabetics. The device, which is worn on the wrist like a watch, uses tiny lasers that resonate with blood glucose and give 24-hour measurements. Glucon's device has been shown to be as accurate as skin pricking. The device is in the process of clinical trials and approval by the FDA.
In the end, though, it comes down to this: to stay well, a person with Diabetes A has to draw blood four times a day.
"If anyone can come up with a cost-effective, safe, non-invasive way to measure glucose, I can't imagine the world not beating a path to their door."
Based on photo-acoustics research first done at Tel Aviv University in Israel, their device uses lasers, ultrasound, and advanced software algorithms to get a reading that is as efficient and accurate as pin-prick tests.
At the heart of the Glucon device is a laser tuned to a frequency that resonates with blood glucose.
When the laser comes into contact with blood glucose, it creates sound waves emanating from the molecule.
Then a miniaturized ultrasound sensor detects those sound waves and a computer chip translates the raw signals into usable data.
While other non-invasive technologies have been able to read glucose levels to a rough level, Glucon's early tests show that it reaches the same efficiency levels as blood-strip tests.
Goldberger points out that since that paper was published, his researchers have made big strides in improving the device's efficacy even further, although he won't release specific numbers.
Because of the non-invasive nature of the technology, though, Glucon's regulatory process is much less arduous than for implantable or skin-puncture medical devices.
If Glucon succeeds in getting FDA approval, its device could revolutionize diabetes management for both the individual patient and the health-care industry.
Yet more than half of those three million make mistakes on a regular basis in glucose monitoring or insulin administration, errors that can lead to insulin shock and a diabetic coma.
Health insurance companies would be willing to pay a premium for such a device if it keeps down the costs of emergency-room visits and long-term health crises, such as diabetic blindness, says the ADA's Petersen.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml