naturalnews.com printable article

Originally published July 18 2014

Who really shot down Malaysia Airlines MH17? Readers weigh in on Russians, conspiracy theories and more

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) For the question of who really shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine, the consensus so far is that the Russians were most likely responsible. But not everybody buys that story, and many people believe someone else might be responsible.

Various theories abound, and I've detailed some of the most popular theories here on Natural News.

They include suggestions that the plane was brought down by Ukraine forces as a false flag attack, or that the plane was targeted and destroyed in order to kill the 100 AIDS researchers on board (who were headed to an AIDS conference).

Some of the more outlandish theories out there suggest the plane was destroyed by the CIA or some other nefarious covert government group, although to my knowledge there is no real evidence of such an assertion. As is common with new events, many people on the 'net are brainstorming possibilities that range from the mundane to the insane.

What do YOU think really happened?

I'm more interested in what YOU think happened. Official explanations publicized on national media may or may not have any resemblance to the truth. Personally, I trust the People to figure things out more than I trust media organizations owned by weapons manufacturers (General Electric) and controlled by the White House.

Using the SquareOff tool below, you can now post your own debate comments on the side of this issue you think is most likely to be true. Did the Russians shoot down MH17, or was it caused by something else entirely?

Pick a side and post your comments in the tool shown below, or read existing comments to find out what other people think.






All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml