naturalnews.com printable article

Originally published May 10 2005

Oregon anti-junk food bill turns into nutritional guideline proposal

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

A recently drafted bill that would outlaw junk food and soft drinks in school did not pass the Oregon state legislature. Those who would have supported such a bill instead voted for an alternate piece of legislation that would not make junk food in school illegal, but would enforce nutritional guidelines in the schools.

The new bill is the target of criticism from those who supported an out-and-out ban, claiming that nutritional guidelines will not help significantly decrease child and teenage obesity, a problem that the initial bill sought to rectify. Nutritional guidelines would also allow each district to decide which foods could and could not advertise in schools.


Plans for a statewide ban on junk food and soft drinks in school died a premature death in the state Senate this week, when a panel of lawmakers instead endorsed a proposal to require schools to adopt nutrition guidelines and other "student wellness" policies. The Senate Education committee approved a rewritten version of a bill that originally sought to ban the sale of food or drink during school hours that is of "minimal nutritional value" according to federal guidelines. The new version bans no foods or beverages of any sort. Instead, it requires each school board to adopt a "wellness policy" that includes goals for nutrition education and physical activities and nutrition guidelines "that promote student health and reduce childhood obesity." The bill also requires school districts to come up with guidelines on advertising foods on school campuses and sets public-participation standards for how each district develops its guidelines. Vicki Walker, D-Eugene, who chairs the Senate Education Committee, said her rewrite represented a pragmatic approach to the growing concerns over how to address obesity among children. "I think we have a bill that can pass both chambers, that does have some teeth," she said. Bill Morrisette, a Springfield Democrat and chief sponsor of a more far-reaching bill regulating what foods schools can provide students, voted against the rewritten bill and said he was undecided whether to support it in the full Senate. "It's a feel-good bill," he told The Register-Guard of Eugene. Mary Lou Hennrich, executive director of the Community Health Partnership, which was pushing for increased nutrition standards statewide, said her group couldn't overcome objections from the food and soft-drink industries.



All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml