Originally published May 10 2005
Drug ads encourage unnecessary prescriptions for depression, study says
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
An unorthodox study conducted between May 2003 and May 2004 claims that television commercials have an effect on the way doctors prescribe anti-depression medication. In the study, 152 actors attended doctor's appointments complaining of false symptoms. After the "patients" mentioned anti-depression medication Paxil, though, doctors prescribed the drug to 55 percent, and diagnosed 50 percent with depression. Critics of Paxil and other anti-depression drugs say that commercials encourage people suffering from depression to turn to medication, rather than seeking treatment. The United States is one of few industrialized nations that allows drug companies to advertise on television, and many physicians are skeptical of such marketing techniques.
- An April 27 article about a study of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs referred to a 2001 Food and Drug Administration warning letter sent to Merck & Co. regarding misleading promotion of its arthritis drug Vioxx.
- The letter concerned promotional audio conferences given on behalf of Merck, a company news release and comments by sales representatives, but not to direct-to-consumer advertising.
- Actors pretending to be patients with symptoms of stress and fatigue were five times as likely to walk out of doctors' offices with a prescription when they mentioned seeing an ad for the heavily promoted antidepressant Paxil, according an unusual study being published today.
- The study employed an elaborate ruse -- sending actors with fake symptoms into 152 doctors' offices to see whether they would get prescriptions.
- Most who did not report symptoms of depression were not given medications, but when they asked for Paxil, 55 percent were given prescriptions, and 50 percent received diagnoses of depression.
- Many public health advocates have long complained about ads showing happy people whose lives were changed by a drug, and now voices in Congress, the Food and Drug Administration and even the pharmaceutical industry are asking whether things have gone too far.
- "It is a haphazard approach to health promotion that is driven primarily by the pharmaceutical industry's interest in turning a profit," said Matthew F. Hollon, an internist at the University of Washington in Seattle, who wrote an editorial accompanying the study in today's Journal of the American Medical Association.
- Hollon and the researchers who conducted the study said it was not realistic to expect such marketing to be abolished, given the climate of deregulation in Washington.
- The researchers sent actors with hidden tape recorders into general physicians' offices in three cities between May 2003 and May 2004.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml