Originally published January 27 2005
Report says lab animals feel severe stress during experiments
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
Scientific studies can be real stress-producers for mice, rabbits, rats, and other lab animals. That’s the conclusion of a report published in “Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science.” One example of a stressor--a mouse who is picked up and briefly held experiences stress-related physiological reactions. The research could provide new ammunition for animal rights groups, which are against lab experiments involving animals.
- Mice, rabbits, rats, beagles, geese, and other animals all show measurable physiological stress responses to routine laboratory procedures that have been up until now viewed as relatively benign.
- The findings come in a new report published in Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science, based on an extensive review of the scientific literature by ethologist Jonathan Balcombe, Ph.D., of Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM).
- For example, a mouse who is picked up and briefly held experiences several physiological reactions.
- In rats and mice, the growth of tumors is strongly influenced by how much the animals are handled.
- The new findings suggest that routine procedures, such as blood draws and use of stomach tubes, are terrifying for animals.
- "In essence, there is no such thing as a humane animal experiment," says Dr. Balcombe.
- Independent of the invasive experiments themselves, these daily routines can cause an animal to experience elevated bloodstream concentrations of corticosterone, prolactin, glucose, and epinephrine, all indicators of stress.
- Impaired immune response has also been recorded in animals after anxiety-producing contact with lab personnel.
- "Research on tumor development, immune function, endocrine and cardiovascular disorders, neoplasms, developmental defects, and psychological phenomena are particularly vulnerable to data being contaminated by animals' stress effects," notes Dr. Balcombe.
- Dr. Balcombe's study follows closely a recent paper in the British Medical Journal, titled "Where Is the Evidence that Animal Research Benefits Humans?"
- The authors found that in many cases trials on humans were conducted concurrently with the animal studies and in other instances, clinical trials went ahead despite evidence of harm from the animal studies.
- Founded in 1985, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is a nonprofit health organization that promotes preventive medicine, especially good nutrition.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml