Evidence-based medicine

Email this page to a friend

Want news about Evidence-based medicine and more e-mailed to you? Click here for free email alerts

Drug companies discredit negative studies and blacklist honest researchers Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

So when you hear people talk about so-called 'evidence-based medicine,' remember that most of the people whose mouths those words emerge from actually live in a world of outrageous scientific distortion. There's very little real evidence in the world of evidence-based medicine. It's largely distortion, hype, promotion, influence, corruption, intimidation and denial. So much for evidence. So much for hard science. What we see today is really just a drug racket disguised as evidence-based medicine.

Pharmaceutical television advertising is a grand hoax Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

So much for the grand claims of "evidence-based medicine." Pharmaceutical medicine, as practiced today, is a grand medical hoax involving the mainstream media, the FDA, drug companies, medical journals, medical schools and even M.D.s. They've all quietly agreed to do whatever it takes to maximize profits at the expense of public health, regardless of the science or the ethics involved. So-called "evidence-based medicine" has become modern-day quackery.

The Secret History of the War on Cancer Devra Davis See book keywords and concepts

The commitment to evidence-based medicine is relatively new. In some of its most ardent practitioners, this commitment can result in clear choices that sometimes may have tragic results. Tom Chalmers was one of the first physicians, along with Archie Cochrane, to urge the scientific study of medical procedures and drugs.20 He was the man Dr. Love and I turned to when we wrote our article for JAMA. We quoted his insistence that research alone would provide the only guidance on how to design better medicine.

Pharmaceutical television advertising is a grand hoax Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

So-called "evidence-based medicine" has become modern-day quackery. Statin drugs, for example, have now been proven to offer absolutely no medical benefit whatsoever to women, with zero reduction in the risk of heart attacks or strokes. HRT drugs have been scientifically proven to actually cause breast cancer and heart attacks, not prevent them. Antidepressant drugs cause diabetes, and diabetes drugs cause liver damage. I could go on, but you get the point.

Medical tyranny in Texas turns teenage girls into HPV vaccination profit centers (opinion) Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

When it comes to money, it seems drug companies will stop at nothing to get more of it, including influencing state officials to mandate vaccine consumption policies that have nothing whatsoever to do with evidence-based medicine or genuine compassion for the health and lives of human beings. What's happening in Texas right now is a form of medical tyranny, and it's only the beginning of what may prove to be a monumental battle between personal freedoms vs. the corporate-controlled State.

Merck Engaged in Blatant Scientific Fraud with Vytorin Cholesterol Study? (opinion) Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

Why "evidence-based medicine" is a joke Modern pharmaceutical medicine has become a grand medical hoax. Beyond all the bribery, price fixing, corruption, dishonest advertising, monopoly prices and deadly drug side effects, underneath the whole thing it's all based on scientific fraud. We're not just talking about one drug and one study here, you see. This is the way Big Pharma routinely conducts business. It's all about getting the results they want to see, regardless of what it takes, who has to be bribed, which researchers have to be intimidated, and so on.

Overtreated: Why Too Much Medicine Is Making Us Sicker and Poorer Shannon Brownlee See book keywords and concepts

By the 1990s, progressive doctors were talking about a new movement called "evidence-based medicine," but well into the twenty-first century, much of what doctors do remains evidence-free. Medicine is both an art and a science, they say, the art being the intuition and informed guesswork they apply in the absence of clear symptoms or good data for what treatments work best. Deans of medical schools often tell graduating doctors that half of what they have learned in the past four years is wrong—but nobody knows which half.

Your Symptoms Are Real: What to Do When Your Doctor Says Nothing Is Wrong Benjamin H. Natelson, M.D. See book keywords and concepts

But then I told you that I continue to try it on patients anyway, which is contrary to the rules of evidence-based medicine I have tried to share with you throughout this book. I break my own rule for two reasons: I am quite positive the drug helps some people (this seemed to be the case for several of the smaller sites in the multicenter trial I headed), and modafinil happens to be a drug we can try within the standard of the Natelson Six-Week Rule. If it fails to have an effect, we'll know it within six weeks.

Overtreated: Why Too Much Medicine Is Making Us Sicker and Poorer Shannon Brownlee See book keywords and concepts

All the evidence suggests that these groups are more likely than doctors in solo practice or small groups to use evidence-based medicine and employ information technology to deliver more-effective care. Another model is the hospital chain that employs physicians. Intermountain Healthcare owns twenty-one hospitals and clinics and employs twenty-one thousand people, including its doctors. If every hospital in America achieved the same level of efficiency in caring for the chronically ill as Intermountain, Medicare would save more than ten billion dollars a year.

Drug companies discredit negative studies and blacklist honest researchers Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

There's very little real evidence in the world of evidence-based medicine. It's largely distortion, hype, promotion, influence, corruption, intimidation and denial. So much for evidence. So much for hard science. What we see today is really just a drug racket disguised as evidence-based medicine. It is wearing the clothes of hard science, but has the character of Al Capone, and that is the system under which we all live and suffer and die today. Of course, you can escape the system by avoiding all prescription drugs, and there is a way to do it intelligently and safely.

Overtreated: Why Too Much Medicine Is Making Us Sicker and Poorer Shannon Brownlee See book keywords and concepts

It doesn't much matter which way a hospital and its affiliated physicians want to organize themselves, as long as they begin working as a cooperative group that uses valid evidence-based medicine. It's possible to imagine that one day, integrated physician-hospital systems will compete with one another for patients on the basis of the quality of care they deliver and their efficiency. The VHA, if it expanded eligibility to all veterans, would be one place among many that veterans could choose.

David Eddy, a heart surgeon turned mathematician turned health care economist and a leader in the evidence-based medicine movement, estimates that as little as 15 percent of what doctors do is backed up by valid evidence. What's the best treatment for chronic sinusitis? Surgery? Antibiotics? Nobody really knows. How well do fertility treatments really work? (Probably not as well as fertility clinics advertise.) What's the most effective way to bring down skyrocketing rates of diabetes? New drugs? Screening people for high blood sugar? Sending patients to weight-loss clinics?

Such small practices have a hard time purchasing IT, but they also are less likely than larger, multispe-cialty practices to use evidence-based medicine. Getting them to integrate the care of the chronically ill, the way the doctors in Bellingham, Washington, have learned to do would mean restructuring the way they are paid. What we really want doctors to do is start behaving less like independent businesses and more like physicians in integrated health care plans like the VHA, Group Health, and the Mayo Clinic.

Stop Prediabetes Now: The Ultimate Plan to Lose Weight and Prevent Diabetes Jack Challem See book keywords and concepts

This is a scientific approach, what some people call evidence-based medicine. Doctors at the center strive to correct nutrient deficiencies and imbalances that contribute to prediabetes, diabetes, overweight, and many other health problems. (In contrast, more conventional drug therapies tend to mask, but not correct, signs of vitamin and mineral deficiencies.) Following this approach, we treat patients appropriately, neither overtreating nor undertreating them. Follow-up testing tracks changes in nutrient levels.

Anxiety: Orthomolecular Diagnosis and Treatment Dr. Jonathan Prousky, BPHE, BSc, ND, FRSH See book keywords and concepts

Evidence Grade In keeping with the current trend in evidence-based medicine, an evidence grade has been assigned to the orthomolecular treatments reviewed in this book. These evidence-based summaries are not meant to provide an exhaustive account of all relevant sources. Rather, only those articles pertaining to anxiety or related psychiatric conditions involving orthomolecular treatments will be assigned evidence grades. These evidence grades are based on the hierarchy of evidence developed by the Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine (Table n).

What If Medicine Disappeared? Gerald E. Markle and Frances B. McCrea See book keywords and concepts

Once again we see that the physician's routine practice and local culture are relatively immune to scientific, evidence-based medicine. The medical literature on the effectiveness of mammograms is confusing and contradictory. Official recommendations change often. "Is a woman less likely to die of breast cancer if she starts screening while she is in her forties?"46 This is the question posed by the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Their answer: Women who received annual mammographies (along with self and clinical breast exams) did not live longer than those who did not.

Once again, the cardiologist eschews evidence-based medicine. Finally, the facilities exist for prompt and aggressive surgery, therefore it can and will happen. "That last point is like saying: 'If you build it, they will come,'" I concluded. As an editorial in the prestigious British medical journal, Lancet, concludes—with typically English humor: "Stents clearly have a great future—they give excellent predictive results in angiography, are clinically safe, and most of all, calm the interventional cardiologist."21 "Finally, something I can agree with," proclaimed Fran.

Phrases like "the integrity of evidence-based medicine" came to mind. But what was the point, aside from further alienating her colleagues and leading the student toward a nervous breakdown? Religious beliefs are particularly resistant to proof. "That's all the questions I have," Fran murmured, studying her notes carefully.

Or rather we should say that evidence-based medicine has dismissed both psychoanalysis and cognitive therapy. The former was abandoned some time ago; as for the latter, meta-analysis has demonstrated that it does not "confer reliable benefits for patients with schizophrenia and cannot be recommended for clinical practice.46 Recall David Rosenhan's experiment. Were it repeated today, his pseudo-patients would surely be treated with drugs (as would Job!), either "neuroleptics," or "atypical antipsychotics.

Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease Ann M. Coulston and Carol J. Boushey See book keywords and concepts

Evidence-based medicine and common sense: practical and ethical issues in clinical trials for osteoporosis. Future Rheumatol. 2, 104-110. 7. Roller, S. T., Voorhees, T., and Lunkenheimer, Jr., A. K. (2006). Obesity, food marketing and consumer litigation: threat or opportunity? Food Drug Law J 61, 419-444. 8. Heaney, R. P. (2005). Vitamin D: Role in the calcium economy. In "Vitamin D," 2nd ed. (D. Feldman, F. H. Glorieux, and J. W. Pike, Eds.), pp. 773-787. Academic Press, San Diego. 9. Shea, B., Wells, G, Cranney, A., Zytaruk, N., Robinson, V., Griffith, L., Ortiz, Z., Peterson, J.

Your Symptoms Are Real: What to Do When Your Doctor Says Nothing Is Wrong Benjamin H. Natelson, M.D. See book keywords and concepts

We call this evidence-based medicine. But as the last two chapters show, there are not that many treatments available for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia (FM), and the other illnesses we've been discussing. So how can I promise to help every patient who walks into my office? I have my own golden rule that trumps the golden rule of medicine: I can always do something to help, so I never tell a patient the situation is hopeless. Traditional Western medical techniques fall under the heading of allopathic medicine, and serve us well as far as they go.

Alternative Medicine?: A History Roberta Bivins See book keywords and concepts

But governments, especially, are committed to 'evidence-based medicine', and reluctant to spend taxpayers' money on unregulated and unproven procedures. Thus, voices from within the major medical heterodoxies—particularly homeopathy, chiropractic, osteopathy, acupuncture, Ayurveda, 'traditional Chinese medicine', and herbal medicine—are calling for regulation or the legal right to self-regulate. And governments are debating the same issues, while increasing funding for 'scientific' research into the efficacy of heterodox practices (to the disgust of many in the biomedical community).

Before You Take that Pill: Why the Drug Industry May Be Bad for Your Health J. Douglas Bremner See book keywords and concepts

Hannele Yki-Javrinen in an editorial in The Lancet in 2005 as being due to "the power of marketing over evidence-based medicine in guiding treatment practices." The number of prescriptions for these drugs for heart-failure patients has doubled over the past five years. A new glitazone, called Muraglitazar, which has been shown to increase the risk of death, heart attack, and stroke by more than twofold,3 has not been approved by the FDA. Another glitazone, called Rezulin, has been taken off the market because of lethal side effects related to liver damage.

Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease Ann M. Coulston and Carol J. Boushey See book keywords and concepts

THE MATTER OF PROOF Both current clinical science and regulatory policy are eagerly pursuing an approach to certainty described as "evidence based," despite frequently overlooked shortcomings in this approach as practiced [5, 6]. evidence-based medicine (EBM), even before it got that name, had typically been applied to evaluation of procedural or pharmacological interventions in individual patients, such as "Does radical mastectomy for breast cancer produce better outcomes than lumpectomy?" or "Do beta blockers improve survival after myocardial infarction?

Psyched Out: How Psychiatry Sells Mental Illness and Pushes Pills That Kill Kelly Patricia O'Meara See book keywords and concepts

For years we were told to practice evidence-based medicine and now, when there is no evidence for SSRI effectiveness. The final blow was learning about the eight negative SSRI [antidepressant] studies in children that were never released to either the doctors or the public. This loss of credibility within the medical profession extends beyond psychiatry into all of medicine and the general public. The blame is clear: The money, power and influence of the pharmaceutical industry corrupt all.

The Divided Mind: The Epidemic of Mindbody Disorders John E. Sarno, M.D. See book keywords and concepts

How can we apply the standards of evidence-based medicine in this situation? Is it possible to do better in studying this approach than has been done? It is difficult because psychological treatments do not easily lend themselves to the ideal clinical trial methodology. How can we conduct studies to see if psychological approaches can cure this condition? Patients with TMS must be psychologically open to the diagnosis to improve. They must be ready to renounce the idea that their cure is to be found in structural or chemical means.

This is called evidence-based medicine. What does this mean? In medicine, we try to determine whether a drug or a procedure works by comparing it to a placebo control or, perhaps, another treatment that has been proven to work, an active control. A placebo treatment can be as a comparison of effectiveness, or a new treatment could be measured for effectiveness against a standard one. This necessitates that the study in which the treatment is tested be designed in a way that will not influence the results and that enough people participate in the study so the results can be meaningful.

Natural Health Solutions Mike Adams See book keywords and concepts

After all, it's all about "evidence-based medicine," right? It is if you don't believe in good science. Because drug companies seem to have conveniently forgotten what good science means anymore. Today, it's not about discovering some new scientific truth, it's about distorting science to sell more products. To call it junk science is an understatement. Big Pharma's trespasses into scientific fraud go way beyond mere junk science.

Thus, the primary determining factor of a positive drug trial outcome New study shows that 94 percent of marketing claims made by pharmaceutical companies have no basis in fact A study carried out by the Institute for evidence-based medicine in Germany has found that 94 percent of the information contained in promotional literature sent to doctors by pharmaceutical companies has absolutely no basis in scientific fact. That means 19 out of 20 statements made by drug companies in their marketing literature are false.

In 2004, a study carried out by the Institute of evidence-based medicine in Germany found that an astonishing 94 percent of the statements contained in promotional literature sent to doctors by drug companies had no basis in scientific fact. As DTC advertisements and promotional literature usually repeat the same information about a particular drug, it is no exaggeration to say that 19 out of 20 statements made in DTC drug advertising are scientifically unproven.

page 1 of 3 | Next ->

FAIR USE NOTICE: The research quoted here is provided under the protection of Fair Use provisions and published by the 501(c)3 non-profit Consumer Wellness Center for the purposes of public comment and education. Authors / publishers may submit books for consideration of inclusion here.

TERMS OF USE: Read full terms of use. Citations of text from NaturalPedia must include: 1) Full credit to the original author and book title. 2) Secondary credit to the Natural News Naturalpedia as a research resource and a link to www.NaturalNews.com/np/index.html

This unique compilation of research is copyright (c) 2008 by the non-profit Consumer Wellness Center.

ABOUT THE CREATOR OF NATURALPEDIA: Mike Adams, the creator of this NaturalNews Naturalpedia, is the editor of NaturalNews.com, the internet's top natural health news site, creator of the Honest Food Guide (www.HonestFoodGuide.org), a free downloadable consumer food guide based on natural health principles, author of Grocery Warning, The 7 Laws of Nutrition, Natural Health Solutions, and many other books available at www.TruthPublishing.com, creator of the earth-friendly EcoLEDs company (www.EcoLEDs.com) that manufactures energy-efficient LED lighting products, founder of Arial Software (www.ArialSoftware.com), a permission e-mail technology company, creator of the CounterThink Cartoon series (www.NaturalNews.com/index-cartoons.html) and author of over 1,500 articles, interviews, special reports and reference guides available at www.NaturalNews.com. Adams' personal philosophy and health statistics are available at www.HealthRanger.org.