Beef industry

Email this page to a friend

Want news about Beef industry and more e-mailed to you? Click here for free email alerts

Mad cow madness: USDA lies and the coming collapse of the U.S. beef industry Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

There's a massive cover-up underway, and it's probably going to take some people dying before the U.S. beef industry has the sense to mandate mad cow disease testing for all cattle. People are going to die, and the beef industry is going to be in shambles. They're going to lose hundreds of millions of dollars. Why? Because they refuse to tell the truth! They refuse to enact safety standards that other countries now have as routine! They refuse to test all the cows. The USDA just doesn't want to tell people anything, it seems. It didn't want to tell them where the cow came from.

The U.S. beef industry is headed for quite a downfall and a global discrediting when the truth finally comes out about mad cow disease being prevalent in U.S. herds. I don't think we've even seen the tip of the iceberg on this issue. There's a lot more mad cow disease out there in my opinion, based on what I've read and heard from cattle ranchers. There's a massive cover-up underway, and it's probably going to take some people dying before the U.S. beef industry has the sense to mandate mad cow disease testing for all cattle.

Taiwan, of course, banned the importation of mad cow disease following the first case of the disease in this country, and then when they heard about this one, they banned it again, and that drives the U.S. beef industry nuts. The Agriculture Department says they're talking with Taiwan authorities "to assure them of the safety of U.S. beef and that our interlocking safeguards did work as they should have worked to protect human and animal health." Oh my -- we have a system that's ironclad around here! Apparently, we know exactly where the cows are...

People are going to die, and the beef industry is going to be in shambles. They're going to lose hundreds of millions of dollars. Why? Because they refuse to tell the truth! They refuse to enact safety standards that other countries now have as routine! They refuse to test all the cows. The USDA just doesn't want to tell people anything, it seems. It didn't want to tell them where the cow came from. There's all this secrecy. You know, if this is supposed to be an open system of interlocking safeguards, why doesn't the USDA stand up and tell us the truth?

Seeing this testing fiasco unfold, one of the watchdog arms of the Department of Agriculture decided the agency had better take some action to protect the integrity of the U.S. beef industry, otherwise the whole thing could collapse when the truth finally came out about mad cow disease. So it decided to order a third test of this cow, and the third test was conducted -- guess where? England. Why? Because they probably couldn't trust the USDA testers in the United States.

Food Pets Die For: Shocking Facts About Pet Food Ann N. Martin See book keywords and concepts

The plaintiffs alleged that Winfrey wrongfully disparaged the U.S. beef industry, which negatively impacted their beef sales. In late 2000, while reading transcripts from the well-publicized trial, I noted that one of the plaintiffs, Paul Engler of Cactus Feeders, Inc., stated that "more than 10 cows with some sort of nervous system disorder were sent to Hereford Byproducts."28 Hereford By-Products is owned by Garth Merrick who also owns Merrick Pet Foods situated at the same location as the rendering plant.

Grocery Warning: How to recognize and avoid the groceries that cause cancer, diabetes, heart disease, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and other common diseases Mike Adams See book keywords and concepts

The beef industry pressures government agencies to back off In 1996, the FDA actually tried to limit the use of certain animal proteins (dead cows, for example) in animal feed. The meat industry and its related groups pulled out all the stops to make sure tighter safety regulations were never passed. As you read the following passage, take special note of all the animal parts mentioned here. These are the parts over which the FDA and meat industry leaders are arguing! (Remember this section next time you even think about reaching for a hot dog...

The Honest Food Guide empowers consumers with independent information about foods and health Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

The grain farmers were happy because the USDA said, "Eat more corn and wheat and rice." The beef industry was happy because it said, "Eat more beef." And, of course, the milk industry was happy because everybody said, "Eat more butter, drink more milk." The message basically was, open your mouth and stuff as much as you can down that throat. That was the government position. Ben: Which was fine for it's time. Mike: Absolutely. It served a purpose. Now, fast forward to the 1980s, and especially into the 1990s, and now you have a population that is not suffering from malnutrition.

Toxic waste chemicals are disposed of by feeding to humans, then calling it fluoride Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

It reminds me of the beef industry, where one of the USDA-approved feed ingredients for cows is, believe it or not, "chicken litter." (I'm not making this up.) Apparently, there's no good way to get rid of all that chicken excrement unless you feed it to cows. You can look this up on the USDA website if you don't believe me. Here's a Google search that will bring up some articles on it. With fluoridation, the American public is basically being treated like cattle. Here: eat some industrial waste products for us, please!

Grocery Warning: How to recognize and avoid the groceries that cause cancer, diabetes, heart disease, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and other common diseases Mike Adams See book keywords and concepts

What most people consider "beef is altogether different from what the beef industry considers "beef." And if you've been eating hot dogs, bologna or other packaged meats over the years, you've probably already had your fill of cow parts.

We've already seen how the beef industry feeds diseased, dead cow parts, including spinal cord tissue, to chickens, and then takes that chicken litter and feeds it back to cows. Is it any surprise that the poultry industry is any less inhumane in their operations? To them, it's just a factory after all. Chickens are kept in tiny cages for the duration of their miserable lives. Their beaks are cut off so they can't injure other chickens when they go mad from the conditions under which they are forced to live.

To get a real look at what goes on in the beef industry, you have to examine the illegal use of growth-promoting hormones, antibiotics and other substances used in cattle in the U.S., as well as the international community's response to that abuse. Illegal use of carcinogenic hormones in cattle This subject has been tackled quite well by author Samuel S. Epstein, M.D., who is one of the most well-informed, well-respected doctors on the subject of environmental and food toxins.

In response to Oprah's comments about beef on the public airwaves, the beef industry went into full-scale assault: Prices for cattle futures were said to have fallen by more than 10 percent in the moments following the broadcast and to have taken weeks to recover. One Texas cattleman told a reporter that his company lost $7 million as a result of the show and that "We're taking the Israeli action on this thing... Get in there and just blow the hell out of somebody." He and other Texas cattle ranchers instituted a $10.3 million class-action suit against Ms.

Below, I reprint sections of his 1990 article published in The International Journal of Health entitled, "The Chemical Jungle: Today's beef industry.

The real reason why processed meats are so dangerous to your health Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

And thus, the saturated fat argument is a distraction from the real causes of cancer that the U.S. beef industry doesn't want to talk about. It's not the saturated fat that causes pancreatic cancer. For example, coconut oil consumption wouldn't cause a person's risk of pancreatic cancer to leap 67%, although it's still saturated fat. The real cause of the cancer, I believe, is what's found INSIDE the fat, and what's ADDED to the meat during processing and packaging.

USDA downplays seriousness of mad cow disease found in Alabama cow Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

The answer, of course, has nothing to do with science but everything to do with food politics and USDA efforts to protect the U.S. beef industry. In fact, many of the top people who work at the USDA used to be key executives, public relations people or marketing people working for various meat industry groups in the United States. It's no surprise that they would want to protect the industry they are supposed to be regulating.

Worldchanging: A User's Guide for the 21st Century Alex Steffen See book keywords and concepts

Reestablished buffalo herds could also be managed sustainably to supplement the beef industry with another kind of red meat. Bison burger, anyone? EG Cow Power Dairy cows produce copious milk. They also produce copious poop. It's not something most people think of as environmental pollution, but cow poop is a real problem when allowed to run into waterways and seep into the ground. But we don't have to let cow waste go to waste. If processed correctly, it can become a power source.

The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of Oil, Climate Change, and Other Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-First Century James Howard Kunstler See book keywords and concepts

This led to the wholesale slaughter of British cattle and the collapse of the English beef industry. Years later, English beef is still regarded with suspicion in Europe. The little that is known about the agent responsible for the disease ought to be worrying. The group of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), which includes mad cow, scrapie, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob, is believed to be caused by a rogue protein called a prion (pronounced PREE-on). They are not living organisms per se, not like bacteria, or even viruses (which are, arguably, mere bundles of RNA with a mission).

Where's the health in health reform? Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

Don't worry about that mad cow disease from a Texas cow (that reluctantly took the USDA seven months and three rounds of testing to finally admit), because the beef industry has executives in key positions at the USDA, and they're out to protect your health, too. Don't worry about all the children being drugged up with antidepressant drugs -- the very same drugs that have been banned from use in children in the U.K. The kids need those drugs. Their brain chemistry needs a fixin'. Come to think of it, don't worry about anything.

The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting, and Other Deadly Prion Diseases Philip Yam See book keywords and concepts

Recognizing that an American strain of BSE could be amplified if rendered cattle were turned into cattle feed, Marsh lobbied hard to have the beef industry end the practice. In 1990, he wrote a paper for Hoard's Dairyman, a national dairy farm journal, that called for such action. Appearing when mad cow furor in the U.K. was reaching its peak, it created a local storm. Marsh became the source of much antipathy from the S3-billion-a-year rendering industry, which processes some 25 million tons of animal material each year.

Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism Marion Nestle See book keywords and concepts

We will see, for example, that the culture of opposition to food safety measures so permeates the beef industry that it led, in one shocking instance, to the assassination of federal and state meat inspectors. To explain this culture of resistance, we need to understand that current problems of food safety are not new but are different. A century ago, the main sources of foodborne illness were milk from infected cows and spoiled meat from sick animals.

The coverage, so far, has focused on cooking procedures at the fast food outlets, not beef industry issues. Let's try to keep it that way."2-6 Although actions beyond home cooking clearly were needed to ensure meat safety, industry leaders continued to deny responsibility. After the 1992 election, when safety advocates pressed the new political appointees at USDA for HACCP regulations to reduce meat pathogens, the industry encouraged its friends in that department to give lukewarm support to such efforts, if any.

Such gross policy interpretation favoring the poultry industry and disfavoring the beef industry is a travesty indeed."40 We will encounter further commentary from Ms. Mucklow later in these pages. In the meantime, the American Meat Institute—which had opposed the safe-food-handling labels—now used them to complain that the proposed testing program would cause food safety problems. Microbial testing would "mislead consumers with promises of a safer food supply, and as a result they may relax their own cooking and handling standards.

This chapter describes how that happened, mainly with respect to HACCP controls for beef. beef industry protests were more vehement and often more effective than those of other industries, and interactions of beef trade associations with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and with Congress left more visible traces.

Although beef industry officials were relieved to learn that fruit and vegetables could also be sources of E. coli Oi57:H7, meat products continued to cause outbreaks and unfavorable press. The USDA responded to the Odwalla outbreak by extending its generic E. coli testing requirements to include meat from goats, ducks, geese, and other animals but, in accordance with provisions of the old laws governing such matters, only after the animals had arrived at slaughterhouses.31 Limitations on USDA authority became even more evident as a result of yet another E.

Food industry giants had big hand in writing US dietary guidelines; nutrition experts bewildered by useless advice Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts

They certainly won't say that red meat causes cancer and heart disease (thanks to lobbying efforts from the beef industry), nor that refined white flour causes nutritional deficiencies and blood sugar disorders (thanks to the grain growers associations). In fact, if you look at the USDA Food Guide Pyramid, it's really just a marketing piece -- a brochure for the food lobby. The foods that are most strongly recommended on the pyramid end up being those with the greatest lobbying budgets. In fact, the pyramid has no relevance whatsoever to good nutritional science.

The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting, and Other Deadly Prion Diseases Philip Yam See book keywords and concepts

Should it happen, the economic cost to the $56-billion-a-year beef industry would be staggering. If the crisis got as bad as in the U.K., it would cost $15 billion in lost revenue alone. Japan estimated that its first three cases of mad cow disease cost $2.76 billion. What's more, it's not beef alone that has prion researchers worried. Cow material has been used in vaccines, dietary supplements, and other products not normally thought of as bovine-related. More relevant to the U.S. than mad cows, perhaps, are the mad deer and elk loose in some parts of the country.

These three lend their expertise to newspaper and magazine stories about prion diseases, and they usually argue that prions represent more of a threat than people realize, and that the government has responded poorly to the dangers because it is more concerned about protecting the beef industry than people's health. Singeltary has similar inclinations, but unlike these men, he doesn't have the professional credentials behind him. He is an nth-grade dropout, a machinist who retired because of a neck injury sustained at work.

Ultraprevention : The 6-Week Plan That Will Make You Healthy for Life Mark Hyman, M.D. See book keywords and concepts

Even though DES (diethylstilbestrol), a synthetic estrogen, was known to cause cancer and birth defects in humans, until recently the beef industry used it to stimulate the growth of cows. Now the industry uses synthetic estrogen. If all this weren't scary enough—be on the lookout for toxic metals, too.

Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism Marion Nestle See book keywords and concepts

H7 testing to the then-current scandal involving President Clinton and a young White House intern, Monica Lewinsky, might seem a stretch for any group less relentless and self-serving than the beef industry. USDA Secretary Dan Glickman said he was "deeply and personally offended by this statement. USD As efforts to improve food safety are grounded in science and a steadfast commitment to protecting public health."45 The industry, however, continued to oppose the USDA's plans to test for E. coli 0157^7.

page 1 of 2 | Next ->

FAIR USE NOTICE: The research quoted here is provided under the protection of Fair Use provisions and published by the 501(c)3 non-profit Consumer Wellness Center for the purposes of public comment and education. Authors / publishers may submit books for consideration of inclusion here.

TERMS OF USE: Read full terms of use. Citations of text from NaturalPedia must include: 1) Full credit to the original author and book title. 2) Secondary credit to the Natural News Naturalpedia as a research resource and a link to www.NaturalNews.com/np/index.html

This unique compilation of research is copyright (c) 2008 by the non-profit Consumer Wellness Center.

ABOUT THE CREATOR OF NATURALPEDIA: Mike Adams, the creator of this NaturalNews Naturalpedia, is the editor of NaturalNews.com, the internet's top natural health news site, creator of the Honest Food Guide (www.HonestFoodGuide.org), a free downloadable consumer food guide based on natural health principles, author of Grocery Warning, The 7 Laws of Nutrition, Natural Health Solutions, and many other books available at www.TruthPublishing.com, creator of the earth-friendly EcoLEDs company (www.EcoLEDs.com) that manufactures energy-efficient LED lighting products, founder of Arial Software (www.ArialSoftware.com), a permission e-mail technology company, creator of the CounterThink Cartoon series (www.NaturalNews.com/index-cartoons.html) and author of over 1,500 articles, interviews, special reports and reference guides available at www.NaturalNews.com. Adams' personal philosophy and health statistics are available at www.HealthRanger.org.