Bottom Line Health See book keywords and concepts | | New finding: herceptin reduces recurrence. Up to 20% of women who have breast cancer have cells that contain an overabundance of the growth-related protein HER2. This substance makes their tumors particularly fast-growing and deadly. The drug herceptin has been developed to block HER2, slowing the duplication of cancer cells. Previous studies have shown that herceptin improves survival rates in HER2-positive women who have early-stage breast cancer (confined to the breast and adjacent lymph nodes) and metastatic breast cancer. | Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts | So, instead, you hear about miracle cures from high-priced prescription drugs like herceptin. Big Pharma hype masters are claiming that a 0.6% percent reduction in absolute risk is the best result in the universe.
I find that laughable, because when you look at the natural medicine world and natural healing, you find that a combination of natural sunlight, physical exercise, green tea, mineral supplementation, colon cleansing and avoidance of cancer-causing foods causes cancer rates to plummet far beyond 0.6 percent. | | One thing we do know about herceptin is that it will be heavily hyped, marketed and advertised. There will be lots of newspaper and magazine articles written about this drug. We also know that it's no better than sunshine, exercise, broccoli, garlic, green tea and other common anti-cancer foods and health strategies.
In other words, this drug is ho-hum. There's really nothing exciting about this drug to anyone who knows anything about real healing. It's really only exciting to the people who can't wait to profit from it. | | The double standard with "cures"
I also find it interesting that this drug, herceptin, is being called a cure for breast cancer with only a 0.6 percent reduction rate (absolute risk) in recurring cancer. If there were an herb that had better than a 0.6 percent reduction rate and you called it a cure, the FDA would jump all over you. The agency would say, "How dare you call it a cure -- there is no such thing as a cure for cancer!"
Apparently, the word "cure" is reserved exclusively for pharmaceuticals; it can never be used with herbs or other nutritional therapies. | | With all this talk about herceptin being the cure for breast cancer, it's funny that you don't see the FDA sending warning letters to the manufacturer of this drug, claiming that these third-party statements are in fact going to be used against them, because the FDA claims that third-party statements about nutritional statements can be held against the very manufacturers of those supplements, even when those manufacturers didn't make those statements. Yet the FDA is doing nothing to shut down this over-hyped, exaggerated miracle-class language being used to describe this prescription drug. | | With herceptin, the aim now is to try to get every woman on this drug whether she has breast cancer or not. That's probably going to end up being the strategy. They'll call it prevention, and they'll put women on it for a lifetime. Ten to 20 years later, we may find out that this drug causes liver or kidney damage. Or perhaps this will be a remarkably safe drug, but how much money will people spend on it over that time, when they could be preventing breast cancer for free? | | He's one of the proponents who calls herceptin a "cure." He probably even does it with a straight face.
Is a 0.6% reduction in deaths really such a big deal? The fact is that getting some regular sunshine and engaging in regular physical exercise has a far greater success rate of reducing the risk of recurring breast cancer. In other words, something you can do absolutely free of charge is better than the most advanced, most miraculous breakthrough the pharmaceutical industry has come up with in 30 years.
You don't see doctors jumping up and down about the healing benefits of sunshine. | Bottom Line Health See book keywords and concepts | | A study reported at a recent American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting confirms the benefits of herceptin. HER2-positive women who were given herceptin after surgery, along with standard chemotherapy, had a 52% lower rate of tumor recurrence than women who weren't given the drug. Women who have invasive breast cancer routinely have tumor cells tested for HER2.
New finding: Exercise fights breast cancer. Previous research showed that physical activity—a 30-minute walk, five days a week—can help prevent breast cancer, cutting risk by 20%. | | In another part of the study, a subgroup of 232 women who had more aggressive cancers were assigned either to receive nine weeks of herceptin infusions or a placebo.
The women who got herceptin experienced 58% fewer cancer recurrences during the three-year follow-up than those who did not get the drug, the researchers report.
FINDING THE OPTIMAL DURATION
According to Joensuu, this study supports previous research. | Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts | In other news, the FDA said it was ready to grant approval to the newest anticancer drug, called herceptin, which, quite miraculously, has been shown to reduce the risk of recurring breast cancer by almost 1 percent. The drug will soon be available by prescription at the low cost of $11,000 per year, per patient. Following the announcement of herceptin, an FDA spokesperson said, "Why do we need to take risks with dangerous vitamin D when we have clinically proven products like herceptin ready to be safely used by everyone? | Bottom Line Health See book keywords and concepts | | However, in this study the herceptin was administered for only nine weeks, which could explain why it was not linked to an increased risk of cardiac failure, as it was in previous research.
"We don't know the optimal duration of [Herceptin]—is nine weeks as good as one year?" asks Dr. Mark Pegram, director of the women's cancer program at the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, part of the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California at Los Angeles. | | The women who got herceptin experienced 58% fewer cancer recurrences during the three-year follow-up than those who did not get the drug, the researchers report.
FINDING THE OPTIMAL DURATION
According to Joensuu, this study supports previous research. "A few prior studies have shown that administration of adjuvant [Herceptin] for one year reduces the rate of breast cancer recurrence by approximately 50%" in women who have aggressive cancers, he says. | | HER2-positive women who were given herceptin after surgery, along with standard chemotherapy, had a 52% lower rate of tumor recurrence than women who weren't given the drug. Women who have invasive breast cancer routinely have tumor cells tested for HER2.
New finding: Exercise fights breast cancer. Previous research showed that physical activity—a 30-minute walk, five days a week—can help prevent breast cancer, cutting risk by 20%. A study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association shows that exercise helps prevent a recurrence. | Mike Adams See book keywords and concepts | When you look at drug claims, especially new miracle-sounding claims on drugs like herceptin, be aware that these statistics are routinely given as relative statistics, not absolute. The numbers are distorted to make the drugs look more effective than they really are. herceptin, for example, produced only a 0.6 percent absolute reduction in breast cancer risk in one study, yet the medical hucksters pushing this drug are wildly screaming about it being a "breast cancer cure!" and demanding that practically all breast cancer patients be immediately put on it. | | Even today's most over-hyped cancer drug, herceptin, which is being heralded as a "miracle cancer drug" for women, only produced a 0.6 percent absolute reduction in breast cancer risk in one study. That's less than one woman out of a hundred actually being helped by the drug, and yet doctors are raving about the drug like it's some sort of miracle. (It's really just pharmaceutical quackery.)
Herceptin holds nothing to the power of this information to prevent and even help cure cancer. | Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts | The numbers are distorted to make the drugs look more effective than they really are. herceptin, for example, produced only a 0.6% absolute reduction in breast cancer risk, yet the medical hucksters pushing this drug are wildly screaming about it being a "breast cancer cure!" and demanding that practically all breast cancer patients be immediately put on it. Yet it's not even effective on one person out of a hundred. See my herceptin Hype article for more details. | Andreas Moritz See book keywords and concepts | This practically makes the sun an instant healer, far more effective than even the most aggressively hyped cancer drugs, such as herceptin.
The second study showed that the same amount of sunlight corresponded with a two-thirds lower risk of contracting colorectal cancer. For any doctor or friend who asks for proof for the "outrageous" claim that sunlight can prevent or cure cancer, you may want to refer him or her to the Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.12. | Bill Sardi See book keywords and concepts | New England Journal Medicine 344: 783-92, 2001]
For the small percentage of women with HER-2 positive (genetically predisposed] breast cancer, (15-30% of cases), herceptin appears to offer a slight improvement in survival -three to four months of added life, with the increased risk of heart failure, and thousands of dollars in costs. For the up to 30% of breast cancer patients who produce the HER2 protein, there is no explaining to them that such a drug could be withheld from use, even if it does increase the risk for mortal heart problems. | | I u on Regimen
Universal dietary and supplement regimens to successfully fight cancer drugs like herceptin, Avastin, Erbitux that temporarily infuse targeted antibodies into a tumor. Anticancer mechanisms within your own body can be activated to put a stop to cancer in a continual manner that exceeds that of anti-cancer drugs.
Cancer authorities now speak of universal mechanisms that can be manipulated to block the growth, spread and recurrence of cancer. | | Most recently, with media reports celebrating such revolutionary cancer medicines as Gleevec, herceptin, Iressa, Er-bitux, and the just-approved Avastin, the cure has seemed closer than ever. But it's not. Hope and optimism, so essential to this fight, have masked some very real systemic problems that have made this complex, elusive, relentless foe even harder to defeat. The result is that while there have been substantial achievements since the crusade began with the National Cancer Act in 1971, we are far from winning the war. So far away, in fact, that it looks like losing.
Living longer? | | NBC News June 20, 2006]
All this is happening at a time when the public is distracted by news reports concerning gene-targeted drugs, like Ires-sa, herceptin and Erbitux, that only prolong survival by a few months, are laden with side effects, and literally cost a fortune ($1000-10,000 a month). The hype surrounding these drugs is unprecedented. The ability of these drugs to perform on Wall Street is being touted above their ability to cure cancer. "None of these drugs prompt the kinds of dramatic tumor shrinkage or disappearance that doctors look for," says an Associated Press report. | | The drug that caused the initial euphoria, herceptin, was later found to only delay the progression of breast cancer by a few months among patients with a specific genetic profile. Slight progress like this "is sometimes breathlessly reported," said Haney. "Right now, in the short run, we can bring an occasional miracle and have an overall small benefit," Dr. John Glaspy, medical director of the UCLA surgical oncology center was reported to have said. | Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts | When you look at drug claims, especially new miracle-sounding claims on drugs like herceptin, be aware that these statistics are routinely given as relative statistics, not absolute. The numbers are distorted to make the drugs look more effective than they really are. herceptin, for example, produced only a 0.6% absolute reduction in breast cancer risk, yet the medical hucksters pushing this drug are wildly screaming about it being a "breast cancer cure!" and demanding that practically all breast cancer patients be immediately put on it. | Bill Sardi See book keywords and concepts | Stunning," "revolutionary," "jaw-dropping," "wonder drug," "cuts disease recurrence in half," are the words used to describe the three reports published in the New England Journal of Medicine involving herceptin (trastuzumab). But if the published results are so "jaw-dropping," why weren't they heralded earlier, when they were first reported at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting?
Women battling breast cancer are never going to hear the details of these studies. They are already rushing to line up for treatment. | Jacky Law See book keywords and concepts | Anastrozole could have been compared with later breast cancer drugs, such as herceptin. This costs £20,000 ($36,000) a year and works spectacularly well in the one in five women that carry the particular genetic flaw it addresses. So well in fact there are calls for women who are known to have this flaw, as expressed in a protein known as HER2, to take it at much earlier stages, putting more strain on limited budgets.41
If the comparison had been with herceptin, anastrozole would not have looked so good. | Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts | With nearly all breast cancer nonprofits being subjugated by drug companies, the FDA censoring alternative cancer solutions, and the mainstream media wildly exaggerating the benefits of near-useless cancer drugs like herceptin, there's hardly a message heard about breast cancer today that doesn't have a profit motive behind it.
"Breast cancer has been transformed into a market-driven industry. It has become more about making money for corporate sponsors than funding innovative ways to treat breast cancer." - Health Studies researcher Samantha King, author of Pink Ribbons Inc. | Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts | Following the announcement of herceptin, an FDA spokesperson said, "Why do we need to take risks with dangerous vitamin D when we have clinically proven products like herceptin ready to be safely used by everyone? | Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts | See my herceptin Hype article for more details.
Reverse the perspective for natural treatments
At the same time, when conventional medicine promoters want to discredit a natural substance, an herbal remedy or the effects of nutrition on health, they always talk about absolute risk. If taking green tea supplements reduce the risk of cancer by that same 50 percent, eliminating cancer in one out of 100 patients, the news about that supplement would be something like this: "Green tea doesn’t work. Only helps one out of 100 patients. | Mike Adams, the Health Ranger See article keywords and concepts | With nearly all breast cancer nonprofits being subjugated by drug companies, the FDA censoring alternative cancer solutions, and the mainstream media wildly exaggerating the benefits of near-useless cancer drugs like herceptin, there's hardly a message heard about breast cancer today that doesn't have a profit motive behind it.
The emphasis on breast cancer "screening," and the circus of holding breast cancer awareness months is, of course, all about recruiting more women into a system of treatment that generates profits for drug companies. |
page 1 of 2 | Next ->
FAIR USE NOTICE: The research quoted here is provided under the protection of Fair Use provisions and published by the 501(c)3 non-profit Consumer Wellness Center for the purposes of public comment and education. Authors / publishers may submit books for consideration of inclusion here.
TERMS OF USE: Read full terms of use. Citations of text from NaturalPedia must include: 1) Full credit to the original author and book title. 2) Secondary credit to the Natural News Naturalpedia as a research resource and a link to www.NaturalNews.com/np/index.html
This unique compilation of research is copyright (c) 2008 by the non-profit Consumer Wellness Center.
ABOUT THE CREATOR OF NATURALPEDIA: Mike Adams, the creator of this NaturalNews Naturalpedia, is the editor of NaturalNews.com, the internet's top natural health news site, creator of the Honest Food Guide (www.HonestFoodGuide.org), a free downloadable consumer food guide based on natural health principles, author of Grocery Warning, The 7 Laws of Nutrition, Natural Health Solutions, and many other books available at www.TruthPublishing.com, creator of the earth-friendly EcoLEDs company (www.EcoLEDs.com) that manufactures energy-efficient LED lighting products, founder of Arial Software (www.ArialSoftware.com), a permission e-mail technology company, creator of the CounterThink Cartoon series (www.NaturalNews.com/index-cartoons.html) and author of over 1,500 articles, interviews, special reports and reference guides available at www.NaturalNews.com. Adams' personal philosophy and health statistics are available at www.HealthRanger.org.
|
 |
Refine your search
with Herceptin...
...and Concepts:...and Study ...and Recurrence ...and Survival ...and Risk ...and Research ...and Therapy ...and Studies ...and Benefits ...and Surgery ...and Meeting
...and Health Conditions and Diseases:...and Breast cancer ...and Cancer ...and Cancers ...and Tumors ...and Cancer cells ...and Tumor cells ...and Allergic reactions ...and Diabetes ...and Asthma ...and Irritability
...and Who:...and Women ...and For women ...and Patients ...and Cancer patients ...and Doctors ...and Americans ...and Physician
...and Key Health Concepts:...and Drug ...and Drugs ...and Side effects ...and Exercise ...and Health ...and Prescription drugs ...and Prescription ...and Disease ...and Conventional medicine ...and Medicine
...and Physiology:...and Rate ...and Effects ...and Reduces ...and Prevent ...and Improves ...and Reduction ...and Helps ...and Swelling ...and Allergic ...and Levels
...and Anatomy:...and Breast ...and Cells ...and Tumor ...and Body ...and Neck ...and Head ...and Body fat
...and Adjectives:...and Aggressive ...and Optimal ...and Physical ...and Clinical ...and American ...and Standard ...and Medical ...and New ...and Potential ...and Herbal
|
Related Concepts:
Women Breast cancer Drug Cancer Study Breast Recurrence Chemotherapy Rate Survival Cells Risk For women Effects Drugs Reduces Research People Tumor Finding Therapy Studies Side effects Benefits After surgery Surgery Hormonal Aggressive Rates Meeting Cancers Prevent Survival rates Optimal Exercise Lymph nodes Mark Improves Block Metastatic Cost Physical Slowing Protein Oncology Society American Cancer cells Clinical Tumors Standard Medical Patients Time Fda Statistics Breast cancer risk Reduction Cancer patients Tumor cells Doctors Risks Advertising Helps Health Body Taking Prevent breast cancer Prior Report Placebo Adjuvant Infusions New Example Allergic reactions Tamoxifen Adverse Swelling Allergic Cardiac failure Prescription drugs Journal of the american medical association Prescription Cutting Green tea Absolute risk Disease Drug companies Distorted Results Potential Colorectal cancer Cancer cure Cure Screaming Costs Work Average Conventional medicine
|