Is Obama's Ebola czar an advocate of human depopulation?

(NaturalNews) Ron Klain, before he became President Obama's latest czar (Klain is the "Ebola czar"), was chief of staff to a pair of Democrat vice presidents, Al Gore and the current VP, Joe Biden. His appointment by Obama has been praised high and low by liberal politicians. U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., has called his appointment an "excellent choice."

But as was noted by critics of the choice when he was named, Klain has no medical experience whatsoever: He's been a Democrat Party hack his entire career, and this latest appointment is seen by some as just another rung on the ladder of Democrat Party power.

To counter that criticism, the Obama Administration said they turned to someone with loads of managerial experience, to make sure that the efforts to contain the deadly virus in the U.S. would be coordinated and efficient. And that sounds good -- except for new evidence that has surfaced which appears to indicate that Klain has very unorthodox views (though not for environmental activist academics and political figures) on global population.

In a recent interview, Klain was asked what he thought might be the top issue facing the world; "it turns out that the new Ebola czar, whose responsibility is to quash the spread of Ebola and save lives, is seemingly an advocate of population and resource control," SHTFplan.com reports. Here are Klain's own words:

I think the top issue facing the world today is how to deal with the continuing growing population in the world and all of the resource demands it places on the world.

And burgeoning populations in Africa and Asia that lack the resources to have a healthy, happy life. I think we've got to find a way to make the world work for everyone.

'Has Klain been appointed for a specific purpose?'

You can see his interview here.

At present, SHTFplan.com notes, it isn't possible to project whether the current cases of Ebola in the U.S. will spread; if it does not, which will be a good thing, Klain's current czarist role will thankfully be short-lived as well. But having someone who may believe that the world's population is too large for the earth's good in charge of stopping a deadly disease is "a conflict of interest" of the worst kind, the website declared.

"Are we looking too far into this? Or is it possible [that] Mr. Klain has been appointed to serve a specific purpose for an agenda that goes well beyond prevention of an Ebola contagion?" the site asked.

Now, Klain, as you can see in the video, did not state explicitly that he was in favor of massive population control, or downsizing of the global population by some means. And he did not list any particular solution for the problem of world population growth. But the fact that he is overseeing efforts in the U.S. to prevent the spread of a disease that, in other parts of the world, kills 70-90 percent of those infected, is a bit of bitter irony, to say the least.

'Global population control' embraced by the 'tolerant' Left

Klain may just be the latest Left-wing extremist environmentalist who advocates for massive reductions in the global population because of the demands that they put on the Earth's resources. In 2006, University of Texas scientist Dr. Erik Pianka advocated the development and use of weaponized strain of airborne Ebola to kill 90 percent of the world's population, as a way to save the Earth. [That story can be found here: http://newsweekly.com.au/article.php?id=2439]

In that speech, Pianka slammed the notion that humans occupy a special place on the planet, and added: "We're no better than bacteria."

Regarding Klain's possible love of planet over people, it wouldn't be the first time that the Obama Administration was linked to the concept of global population control. In 2009, reports surfaced that administration science czar John Holdren co-wrote a book published in 1977 in which he supported the idea of a world government that would employ a global law enforcement agency to see that very authoritarian measures aimed at controlling the world population were carried out. That would include forced abortions, widespread sterilization via food and water and mandatory implants that would obstruct couples from having children.

Presumably, as is usually the case with elitists like these, such rules would only apply to the unwashed masses -- not academics and society managers like them.

Learn all these details and more at the FREE online Pandemic Preparedness course at www.BioDefense.com

Sources:

http://www.cbsnews.com

http://www.shtfplan.com

https://www.youtube.com

http://newsweekly.com.au

http://zombietime.com