Wikipedia

Wikipedia steals photographer's copyrighted monkey photo, refuses to remove it


Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
BACK INTO THE CLOSET: Why U.S. reporters are not allowed to write about rainbow events in nations where being gay is still condemned
Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized
A family destroyed: Six-month-old dies after clinic injects baby with 13 vaccines at once without mother's informed consent
Biologist explains how marijuana causes tumor cells to commit suicide
Companies begin planting microchips under employees' skin
BAM! Chipotle goes 100% non-GMO; flatly rejecting the biotech industry and its toxic food ingredients
ECONOMIC SLAVERY FOR ALL: While we were distracted with the Confederate flag flap, Congress quietly forfeited our entire economic future via fast-track trade authority
INVESTIGATION: Three days before Dr. Bradstreet was found dead in a river, U.S. govt. agents raided his research facility to seize a breakthrough cancer treatment called GcMAF
NJ cops bust teenagers shoveling snow without a permit
Chemotherapy kills cancer patients faster than no treatment at all
McDonald's in global profit free fall as people everywhere increasingly reject chemically-altered toxic fast food
March Against Monsanto explodes globally... World citizens stage massive protests across 38 countries, 428 cities... mainstream media pretends it never happened
Italian court rules mercury and aluminum in vaccines cause autism: US media continues total blackout of medical truth
The 21 curious questions we're never allowed to ask about vaccines
SCOTUS same-sex marriage decision may have just legalized the concealed carry of loaded firearms across all 50 states, nullifying gun laws everywhere
Orthorexia Nervosa - New mental disorder aimed at people who insist on eating a clean diet
Vicious attack on Dr. Oz actually waged by biotech mafia; plot to destroy Oz launched after episode on glyphosate toxicity went viral
Nearly every mass shooting in the last 20 years shares one surprising thing? and it's not guns
Delicious
(NaturalNews) The "global encyclopedia" website Wikipedia, so renowned for its inaccuracies that institutions of higher education across the U.S. and around the world refuse to allow students to cite it, is at it again, this time refusing to honor a photographer's copyright.

According to Britain's Telegraph newspaper, Wikimedia, the U.S.-based group behind the Wikipedia sites, is refusing to grant a photographer's repeated requests to take down an image of his which is being used online without his permission. Wikimedia is claiming that, since the monkey pressed the shutter button itself, it really owns the copyright.

David Slater, a British nature photographer, was shooting in Indonesia in 2011, in an attempt to get the perfect image of a crested black macaque when, suddenly, one of the animals came up to examine his equipment, took the camera and took hundreds of "selfies."

'He must have taken hundreds of pictures'

A great deal of the self-taken photos were blurry, and others were pointed in many directions, including at the jungle floor. But among those were several wonderful images, including a selfie taken by a grinning female macaque which eventually made headlines around the world and gave Slater his customary 15 minutes of fame.

"They were quite mischievous jumping all over my equipment, and it looked like they were already posing for the camera when one hit the button," Slater said at the time. "The sound got his attention and he kept pressing it. At first it scared the rest of them away but they soon came back - it was amazing to watch.

"He must have taken hundreds of pictures by the time I got my camera back, but not very many were in focus. He obviously hadn't worked that out yet," Slater deadpanned.

However, after appearing on numerous websites and in newspapers, magazines and on television programs around the world, Slater now faces a legal battle with Wikimedia after the organization added the image to its collection of royalty-free pics available online. The Wikimedia Commons, as it is called, is a collection of more than 22.3 million images and videos that are ostensibly free to use by anyone.

But the nature photog is claiming that the decision by Wikimedia is jeopardizing his income, because anyone who wants it can take his image for free and use it in any manner, without having to pay Slater a royalty.

He has complained to Wikimedia, informing the group that he owns the copyright, but a recent transparency report from the organization, which provided details of all removal requests that it has received, shows that editors made the decision that Slater has no claim on the pic because the monkey took the picture.

Slater now faces an estimated 10,000-pound [$16,800] legal bill to take the matter to court, The Telegraph reported.

"If the monkey took it, it owns copyright, not me, that's their basic argument. What they don't realise is that it needs a court to decide that," he said, adding that, in the past, the image had been removed, but different editors eventually uploaded it again.

"Some of their editors think it should be put back up. I've told them it's not public domain, they've got no right to say that its public domain. A monkey pressed the button, but I did all the setting up," Slater said.

Expensive trip

The photog said his trip to Indonesia was very expensive and that he has not made a lot of money from the image, even though it has become very popular.

"That trip cost me about [$3,300] for that monkey shot. Not to mention the [$8,400] of equipment I carried, the insurance, the computer stuff I used to process the images. Photography is an expensive profession that's being encroached upon. They're taking our livelihoods away," he said.

"For every 10,000 images I take, one makes money that keeps me going. And that was one of those images. It was like a year of work, really."

In its released transparency report, Wikimedia says it "does not agree" that Slater owns the copyright, but in addition, U.S. law means that "non-human authors" do not have automatic copyrights to photos either.

Though Wikimedia likes to tout itself as the world's "No. 1 free encyclopedia," it is episodes like this -- coupled with the site's serial errors, mistakes and politically motivated entries -- that prevent it from being taken seriously in academia.

Sources:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk

http://isites.harvard.edu

http://www.naturalnews.com

Explore more on Wikipedia by searching on GoodGopher.com, the search engine for truth seekers.
Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.