Why are taxpayers subsidizing bad food choices?

Sunday, March 02, 2014 by: J. D. Heyes
Tags: farm bill, taxpayers, crop subsidies

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
BACK INTO THE CLOSET: Why U.S. reporters are not allowed to write about rainbow events in nations where being gay is still condemned
Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized
A family destroyed: Six-month-old dies after clinic injects baby with 13 vaccines at once without mother's informed consent
INVESTIGATION: Three days before Dr. Bradstreet was found dead in a river, U.S. govt. agents raided his research facility to seize a breakthrough cancer treatment called GcMAF
BAM! Chipotle goes 100% non-GMO; flatly rejecting the biotech industry and its toxic food ingredients
BOMBSHELL: China and America already at war: Tianjin explosion carried out by Pentagon space weapon in retaliation for Yuan currency devaluation... Military helicopters now patrolling Beijing
ECONOMIC SLAVERY FOR ALL: While we were distracted with the Confederate flag flap, Congress quietly forfeited our entire economic future via fast-track trade authority
March Against Monsanto explodes globally... World citizens stage massive protests across 38 countries, 428 cities... mainstream media pretends it never happened
GMO crops totally banned in Russia... powerful nation blocks Monsanto's agricultural imperialism and mass poisoning of the population
SCOTUS same-sex marriage decision may have just legalized the concealed carry of loaded firearms across all 50 states, nullifying gun laws everywhere
Nearly every mass shooting in the last 20 years shares one surprising thing? and it's not guns
Vicious attack on Dr. Oz actually waged by biotech mafia; plot to destroy Oz launched after episode on glyphosate toxicity went viral
Holistic cancer treatment pioneer Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez dies suddenly; patients mourn the loss of a compassionate, innovative doctor who helped thousands heal from cancer
Pepsi drops aspartame from diet soda as consumers reject toxic sweetener
Bride of Frankenfood: Hillary Clinton pushes GMO agenda... hires Monsanto lobbyist... takes huge dollars from Monsanto
Wild eyes and bowl cuts: Why do mass shooters always share the same hair styles and crazed zombie stares?
Mind control through emotional domination: How we're all being manipulated by the "crisis of the NOW"
Genetically white woman now claims self-identify as black: If you can choose your gender, can you also choose your race? What about your species? Can a human claim to be a llama?
(NaturalNews) One quick perusal of the recently passed agricultural bill in Congress will show you what is inherently wrong with it: Taxpayers are being forced to heavily subsidize some of the worst crops in terms of our health.

According to The Washington Post's Tamar Haspel, two of those crops -- corn and soy -- are in and of themselves bad enough (the vast majority of both of these crops, for example, are genetically modified strains). But worse, taxpayer subsidies of these crops "facilitate the meat and processed food we're supposed to eat less of," while doing "almost nothing for the fruits and vegetables we're supposed to eat more of."

If the public's money is to be obligated to bolster U.S. agricultural growth and development in a way that supports the national goal of better health, "shouldn't it be the other way around?" she writes.

Of course it should be. But as one might have guessed, the problem is deeply rooted in a culture of corporate influence over legislative processes:

The problem dates back to the bill's inception in the 1930s, when farms raised livestock and grew a mix of crops, including staple crops (corn, wheat, oats, barley) and what the bill calls "specialty crops" but what the rest of us know as fruits and vegetables.

'To me, it comes down to money and lobbyists'

For the next several decades, until about 1980, subsidies by themselves were not large enough to significantly alter the mix of crops on farms, said Vincent Smith, a professor of economics at Montana State University and a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.

"In 1980, we introduced crop insurance subsidies of substance that began to change the ways in which farmers manage risk, and to discourage diversification," he told the Post. Since then, the government has increased those subsidies until they became quite substantial. Farmers, in essence, then began farming according to the farm bill in the same way that teachers teach to a test, Haspel wrote.

Dr. Kathy Gruver, PhD, an expert educator and lecturer and founder of The Alternative Medicine Cabinet, told Natural News that too many outside interests influence the makeup of annual farm bills.

"To me, it comes down to money and lobbyists," she told Natural News, adding that the focus ought to be on what amounts to healthier food policy for a chronically overweight nation.

"The companies that manufacture these crops and then the foods that they go in to are making fake foods that lead to and contribute to disease and obesity," she said. "We need access to fresh organically grown fruits and vegetables. Unfortunately, these small and family farms don't have access to lobbyists and huge amounts of funding."

Some changes in 2014 farm bill but subsidies abound

Dr. Glen Swartwout, an accomplished naturopathic physician and scholar, agrees that there is too much corporate influence in crafting farm bill legislation. And he also believes the emphasis is not on improving the lives and health of Americans.

"Corporations provide advantages in commerce not available to family farmers, back yard gardeners, and other producers of whole, fresh vital health promoting foods," he told Natural News. But, he added, commercially produced foods "are generally less fresh, more processed and refined, less nutritious, more packaged and adulterated with additives."

"Corporations were rare in the early days of our nation, because they were understood to be an occasionally 'necessary evil' in order to accomplish some otherwise unattainable good, such as building a toll bridge. Today, corporations rule the government, the actual definition of fascism," Swartwout said.

The alternative is unclear. Direct payments were discontinued in the 2014 farm bill, and there are provisions contained in it that aid growers of mixed crops. But all in all it will still cost taxpayers hundreds of billions and continue to subsidize some of the worst crops.


Follow real-time breaking news headlines on
Farm bill at
Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...


Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source:

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.