organic

Repeat of Prop 37? Chemical industry swoops in during final hour to kill GMO labeling in Washington; Segments of 'natural,' organic products industry still missing

Tuesday, September 24, 2013 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: I-522, GMO labeling, campaign contributions

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
BACK INTO THE CLOSET: Why U.S. reporters are not allowed to write about rainbow events in nations where being gay is still condemned
Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized
INVESTIGATION: Three days before Dr. Bradstreet was found dead in a river, U.S. govt. agents raided his research facility to seize a breakthrough cancer treatment called GcMAF
A family destroyed: Six-month-old dies after clinic injects baby with 13 vaccines at once without mother's informed consent
Biologist explains how marijuana causes tumor cells to commit suicide
BOMBSHELL: China and America already at war: Tianjin explosion carried out by Pentagon space weapon in retaliation for Yuan currency devaluation... Military helicopters now patrolling Beijing
Companies begin planting microchips under employees' skin
BAM! Chipotle goes 100% non-GMO; flatly rejecting the biotech industry and its toxic food ingredients
ECONOMIC SLAVERY FOR ALL: While we were distracted with the Confederate flag flap, Congress quietly forfeited our entire economic future via fast-track trade authority
NJ cops bust teenagers shoveling snow without a permit
McDonald's in global profit free fall as people everywhere increasingly reject chemically-altered toxic fast food
March Against Monsanto explodes globally... World citizens stage massive protests across 38 countries, 428 cities... mainstream media pretends it never happened
Italian court rules mercury and aluminum in vaccines cause autism: US media continues total blackout of medical truth
SCOTUS same-sex marriage decision may have just legalized the concealed carry of loaded firearms across all 50 states, nullifying gun laws everywhere
Orthorexia Nervosa - New mental disorder aimed at people who insist on eating a clean diet
Vicious attack on Dr. Oz actually waged by biotech mafia; plot to destroy Oz launched after episode on glyphosate toxicity went viral
Nearly every mass shooting in the last 20 years shares one surprising thing? and it's not guns
Holistic cancer treatment pioneer Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez dies suddenly; patients mourn the loss of a compassionate, innovative doctor who helped thousands heal from cancer
Delicious
(NaturalNews) Washington has taken the baton from California in an effort to be the first state in America to require the labeling of genetically-modified organisms (GMOs). But like with Proposition 37 in California, which was defeated by a very slim (and highly questionable) margin back in 2012, the chemical industry is now dumping huge amounts of cash into defeating this initiative during the final hour, while a number of major names in organic and "natural" food, including Trader Joe's, Sprouts Farmers Market and Hain Celestial, are nowhere to be found in offering any financial support whatsoever during the final push to pass I-522.

According to the Yes on 522 campaign, neither Trader Joe's nor Sprouts has contributed financially to I-522, nor have they even endorsed the effort, as of this writing. Hain Celestial and its various brands are listed as endorsers of the effort, but as far as we can tell, the company itself has not donated financially to the cause, which is what really matters when it comes to fighting the deep pockets of the opposition.

Meanwhile, a number of brands in the health imposter category, which include brands like Kashi (owned by the Kellogg Company), Horizon Organic (owned by Dean Foods), Santa Cruz Organic (owned by Smucker's) and Larabar (owned by General Mills), are actually working against I-522. Believe it or not, each of these companies is either owned by a parent company or aligned with a front group that actually wants to keep GMOs a secret.

The non-profit organic advocacy group Cornucopia Institute has created a helpful infographic that illustrates where all your favorite "natural" and organic food brands stand on the issue of GMO labeling, and specifically I-522. You can view this powerful graphic here: (http://www.cornucopia.org)

Why are some purveyors of non-GMOs refusing to lend their support to I-522?

So where exactly is Hain Celestial, which is more than happy to scarf down its piece of the multi-billion dollar natural products pie, in actually fighting for honest food labeling by pledging financial support for I-522? What about Trader Joe's, which claims to oppose the use of GMOs in its own products? Or Sprouts, a burgeoning health food grocer in the Midwest? Do these companies care at all that Monsanto and the others are pulling the same strategy they used to defeat Prop. 37 by pouring money into the No on 522 campaign?

This is the million-dollar question that people like Ronnie Cummins from the Organic Consumers Association and we here at NaturalNews are also wondering. Just like with Prop. 37, I-522 has had more public support than opposition since its inception. But as of September 11, this appears to be changing, as Monsanto, DuPont and the other corporate food villains swoop in with their last-minute, multi-million dollar donations to deceive the public and kill I-522.

"Will the supposed champions of consumers' right to know, the Organic and 'Natural' Elite, please stand up and be counted?" wrote Cummins in a scathing piece recently about this apparent betrayal by a large segment of the natural products industry. Some of the companies that Cummins mentions in his piece have since donated some money or resources to the Yes on 522 campaign.

Meanwhile, leading the charge just as they did with Prop. 37 are major donors Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps, Organic Consumers Fund Committee, Mercola.com, Presence Marketing, William T. Weiland (from Presence Marketing), Nature's Path Foods and the Center for Food Safety Action Fund among many others. NaturalNews has also pledged to donate $10,000 to the Yes on 522 campaign. This brings total Yes on 522 campaign contributions to around $3.3 million.

As far as the opposition, Monsanto reportedly dumped another $4.6 million into the No on 522 campaign just recently, and DuPont Pioneer also contributed an additional $3.2 million -- as of Sept. 11, this brings the total No on 522 campaign war chest to a whopping $11 million.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.organicconsumers.org

http://docs.google.com

http://www.responsiblechoiceswa.org

http://www.king5.com

http://organicconsumersfund.org

http://www.spiritofchange.org

http://yeson522.com

Follow real-time breaking news headlines on
I-522 at FETCH.news
Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.