Unregulated nanoparticles in the food supply may pose health risks

Tuesday, September 10, 2013 by: Carolanne Wright
Tags: nanoparticles, food supply, health risks

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
BACK INTO THE CLOSET: Why U.S. reporters are not allowed to write about rainbow events in nations where being gay is still condemned
Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized
A family destroyed: Six-month-old dies after clinic injects baby with 13 vaccines at once without mother's informed consent
INVESTIGATION: Three days before Dr. Bradstreet was found dead in a river, U.S. govt. agents raided his research facility to seize a breakthrough cancer treatment called GcMAF
BAM! Chipotle goes 100% non-GMO; flatly rejecting the biotech industry and its toxic food ingredients
BOMBSHELL: China and America already at war: Tianjin explosion carried out by Pentagon space weapon in retaliation for Yuan currency devaluation... Military helicopters now patrolling Beijing
ECONOMIC SLAVERY FOR ALL: While we were distracted with the Confederate flag flap, Congress quietly forfeited our entire economic future via fast-track trade authority
March Against Monsanto explodes globally... World citizens stage massive protests across 38 countries, 428 cities... mainstream media pretends it never happened
GMO crops totally banned in Russia... powerful nation blocks Monsanto's agricultural imperialism and mass poisoning of the population
SCOTUS same-sex marriage decision may have just legalized the concealed carry of loaded firearms across all 50 states, nullifying gun laws everywhere
Nearly every mass shooting in the last 20 years shares one surprising thing? and it's not guns
Vicious attack on Dr. Oz actually waged by biotech mafia; plot to destroy Oz launched after episode on glyphosate toxicity went viral
Holistic cancer treatment pioneer Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez dies suddenly; patients mourn the loss of a compassionate, innovative doctor who helped thousands heal from cancer
Pepsi drops aspartame from diet soda as consumers reject toxic sweetener
Bride of Frankenfood: Hillary Clinton pushes GMO agenda... hires Monsanto lobbyist... takes huge dollars from Monsanto
Wild eyes and bowl cuts: Why do mass shooters always share the same hair styles and crazed zombie stares?
Mind control through emotional domination: How we're all being manipulated by the "crisis of the NOW"
Genetically white woman now claims self-identify as black: If you can choose your gender, can you also choose your race? What about your species? Can a human claim to be a llama?
(NaturalNews) If you need another reason to avoid processed and packaged foods, have a look at the lax standards surrounding nanotechnology. Falling under a system similar to the FDA's food additive GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) designation, nanomaterial is already infiltrating the food supply without oversight. Even organics are at risk. Used in food packaging and food itself, nanoparticles are also found in many body care lotions, sunscreens, cosmetics, clothing and glare-reducing eyeglass coatings. With nanotechnology product sales reaching $225 billion in 2009 alone, these engineered particles are big business. Nonetheless, the question begs to be asked: are they safe?

Considerable conflict of interest

Where GRAS food additives are concerned, manufacturers are running the show - not the FDA. In 1997, the agency announced a voluntary notification system. If food manufacturers were so inclined, they could inform the FDA of any new additive they (the manufacturer) considered appropriate for GRAS classification. As stated in the article, "'Safety assessments' on nearly all common food additives found to be manipulated by processed food industry: Study:"

"Between 1997 and 2012, the FDA reportedly received 451 voluntary notifications about new food additives, 100 percent of which came from individuals and groups connected in one way or another to the food industry. Rather than be accompanied by independent safety research, every single one of these new additives came with "safety data" conjured by the companies that produce them, a serious conflict of interest that apparently has become the standard rather than the exception."

Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition at New York University, further explains the process in USA Today:

"The companies hire a consulting firm to get experts for them and then the experts review the information that's available and then they write a letter to FDA saying this additive should be considered GRAS."

Not exactly the most objective method for introducing a new element into the food supply. A similar protocol applies to nanomaterial as well.

Possible health risks

Nanotechnology is the process of manipulating matter at the molecular level. Considered revolutionary, over 300 products already utilize the technology. Nestle, Kraft, Altria, Heinz and Unilever all heavily research and develop nanoproducts. Regardless of corporate profit, the fact remains that nanomaterial is untested and presents several safety concerns, mainly the potential to:

- Bypass the blood-brain barrier as well as the placenta

- Increase bioavailability of chemicals and toxins

- Migrate throughout the body to organs and tissues

Furthermore, since nanoparticles differ in total surface area compared to their larger counterparts, they are more reactive and have greater toxicity than what would occur at normal size.

Although the FDA recognizes the possible health risks, it has yet to establish stringent safety standards. A draft guide for the food processing industry was released in 2012 stating that "nanotechnology could affect the identity, safety, and regulatory status of a food substance, and may warrant a regulatory submission to the FDA," according to the Alliance for Natural Health. However, once again, the burden is placed upon the manufacturer to determine whether the product is safe and if it's necessary to notify the FDA or not.

Unfortunately, there isn't a guarantee that organic food hasn't been contaminated with nanomaterial either. The National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) has recommended the prohibition of nanoparticles in certified organic food, but the panel has not thoroughly implemented the proposal.


About the author:
Carolanne believes if we want to see change in the world, we need to be the change. As a nutritionist, wellness coach and natural foods chef, she has encouraged others to embrace a healthy lifestyle of green living for over 13 years. Through her website she looks forward to connecting with other like-minded people who share a similar vision.

Follow on Facebook:

For Pinterest fans:

Find at Google+:



and Twitter:

Read her other articles on Natural News here:

Follow real-time breaking news headlines on
Nanoparticles at
Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...


Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source:

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.