health

Single women's health insurance premiums set to double in California, thanks to Obamacare

Monday, July 01, 2013 by: J. D. Heyes
Tags: Obamacare, insurance premiums, single women

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 now clearly a government cover-up: All evidence contradicts official story
White House admits staging fake vaccination operation to gather DNA from the public
10 other companies that use the same Subway yoga mat chemical in their buns
High-dose vitamin C injections shown to annihilate cancer
Irrefutable proof we are all being sprayed with poison: 571 tons of toxic lead 'chemtrailed' into America's skies every year
EXCLUSIVE: Natural News tests flu vaccine for heavy metals, finds 25,000 times higher mercury level than EPA limit for water
Truvia sweetener a powerful pesticide; scientists shocked as fruit flies die in less than a week from eating GMO-derived erythritol
Senator who attacked Doctor Oz over dietary supplements received over $146,000 in campaign contributions from Big Pharma mega-retailer and Monsanto
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
HOAX confirmed: Michelle Obama 'GMOs for children' campaign a parody of modern agricultural politics
U.S. treating meat with ammonia, bleach and antibiotics to kill the '24-hour sickness'
Ben and Jerry's switches to non-GMO, Fair Trade ice cream ingredients
Battle for humanity nearly lost: global food supply deliberately engineered to end life, not nourish it
Russia taking McDonald's to court, threatens countrywide shutdown
Diet soda, aspartame linked to premature deaths in women
Cannabis kicks Lyme disease to the curb
Elliot Rodger, like nearly all young killers, was taking psychiatric drugs (Xanax)
Harvard research links fluoridated water to ADHD, mental disorders
Delicious
(NaturalNews) Progressives claim to be the most sensitive to women's issues, yet they are the first ones to back policies that either harm or otherwise suppress women. Case in point: Obamacare.

Back in the day when the president and his congressional allies were selling this turkey to the American people, one of their most oft-repeated lies was that health care reform would lead to lower costs - lower fees for service, lower hospital costs, lower government costs and lower health care premiums.

One of the demographics that stood to benefit the most from "hope and change" brought on by the Affordable Care Act is young people - and especially young women. But that won't be the case in ultra-left wing California, home to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. There, both men and women will suffer tremendous health insurance "rate shock."

According to Forbes:

This is because the Golden State already bars insurers from charging different rates on the basis of gender in the individual market. According to the National Women's Law Center, 10 other states also do so: Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Washington. A twelfth state, Vermont, limits but does not prohibit gender rating.

So, writes Avik Roy, a Forbes contributor, that means men and women will pay equally dearly.

Progressive hypocrisy regarding women

"If you compare the cheapest plan on healthcare.gov to the cheapest Bronze plan on the new Covered California insurance exchange, premiums for healthy 25-year-olds will increase by 147 percent - a median of $183 on the exchange vs. $74 today - and premiums for healthy 40-year-olds will increase by 149 percent - a median of $234 on the exchange vs. $94 today," he writes.

Why does it matter? Other than the fact that liberals claim to be champions of women, a lot. For much of the coming decade, men are expected to bear the brunt of Obamacare's expenses, even in California. But that gap narrows in the coming years.

"While premiums will go up equally for men and women in California, women should benefit more from Obamacare's subsidies. That's because 40-year-old women have lower average incomes than men do," he says. "That's great news for women whose wages are below the national average, or whose households that are larger than the national average. But it's terrible news for those with above-average incomes, along with those who are unmarried or childless. And it's also bad news for the men who today pay for the disproportionate share of Obamacare's subsidies."

He adds: "...[I]n California, if you're a single woman with a decent-paying job that doesn't offer health insurance, you're about to get hammered."

That said, make no mistake about it: Obamacare - and in particular the cost thereof - is going to devastate all sorts of American households, from sea to shining sea. The reality of higher insurance premiums, longer waits to see a health care provider, doctor shortages, overstuffed emergency rooms (even more than they already are), and cost increases are just a few short months away (January 1, 2014).

But wait, you argue. Don't we all have to purchase health insurance now? Hasn't the Supreme Court made that abundantly clear by ruling that the individual mandate in Obamacare was not a fee but a tax?

Yes, that's what the ruling says. But that's not how it's going to work.

The disaster looms

Millions of Americans - especially young people just starting out - won't be able to afford the huge premiums, so they will opt out of the system and pay a lower-cost fine for doing so. That means fewer healthier people will be paying into the health insurance exchanges, which means that the premiums for those who do pay in will have to be higher to cover the higher costs of covering older, unhealthier members.

Roy sees it:

The bigger problem, of course, is what happens if the people who face higher costs under Obamacare drop out of the system and pay the fine instead. Such adverse selection would make premiums even less affordable, and require a greater outlay of taxpayer subsidies.

Sticker shock. Longer wait times. Higher premiums. Elevated costs.

America's healthcare system is about to undergo a "fundamental transformation," as the president said during his 2008 campaign.

But not for the better, particularly for women in California.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.forbes.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://www.theblaze.com

Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.