airports

TSA pulls naked body scanners out of key airports; still refuses to submit to third-party safety testing

Monday, October 29, 2012 by: J. D. Heyes
Tags: TSA, naked body scanners, airports

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 now clearly a government cover-up: All evidence contradicts official story
White House admits staging fake vaccination operation to gather DNA from the public
10 other companies that use the same Subway yoga mat chemical in their buns
High-dose vitamin C injections shown to annihilate cancer
Irrefutable proof we are all being sprayed with poison: 571 tons of toxic lead 'chemtrailed' into America's skies every year
EXCLUSIVE: Natural News tests flu vaccine for heavy metals, finds 25,000 times higher mercury level than EPA limit for water
Truvia sweetener a powerful pesticide; scientists shocked as fruit flies die in less than a week from eating GMO-derived erythritol
Senator who attacked Doctor Oz over dietary supplements received over $146,000 in campaign contributions from Big Pharma mega-retailer and Monsanto
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
HOAX confirmed: Michelle Obama 'GMOs for children' campaign a parody of modern agricultural politics
U.S. treating meat with ammonia, bleach and antibiotics to kill the '24-hour sickness'
Ben and Jerry's switches to non-GMO, Fair Trade ice cream ingredients
Battle for humanity nearly lost: global food supply deliberately engineered to end life, not nourish it
Diet soda, aspartame linked to premature deaths in women
Russia taking McDonald's to court, threatens countrywide shutdown
Cannabis kicks Lyme disease to the curb
Elliot Rodger, like nearly all young killers, was taking psychiatric drugs (Xanax)
Harvard research links fluoridated water to ADHD, mental disorders
Delicious
(NaturalNews) After months of complaints, negative feedback, bad press and no small amount of controversy, the Transportation Security Administration has announced it will begin removing its naked body scanners out of key airports around the country.

Janet Napolitano, head of the Department of Homeland Security - which oversees the TSA - made the decision in recent days to pull the scanners from New York City's LaGuardia and John F. Kennedy International airports.

The question is why. Why did it take so long? And what's the reason for the move? Understand that the machines are not being retired (at great taxpayer expense); they have simply been moved to other, less busy, airports where, presumably "far fewer passengers will be exposed to radiation," reported the non-profit investigative media organization ProPublica, which added that the dangerous machines were already removed from Boston's busy Logan International Airport earlier this month.

The Chicago Sun Times is reporting that the backscatter machines are going away from Chicago's O'Hare Airport as well.

Oh, they're not dangerous - Move is 'strategic'

The TSA's "official" excuse is that the machines were causing unacceptable delays at the two NYC airports and that removing them is an effort to speed up the lines.

Since when has the TSA given two hoots about customer service? This is the agency that allows its staff to grope kids, grandmothers and busty women, while allowing the criminals it hires to rob passengers blind before heading home to download child pornography.

No, some other reason that the agency feels is threatening - or potentially threatening - has forced this decision. Could it be that critics like us have been right all along - that the revealing backscatter x-ray machines actually do cause harm?

The agency says no, that's not the reason. But when was the last time a federal agency admitted a mistake?

"They're not all being replaced," TSA spokesman David Castelveter told ProPublica. "It's being done strategically. We are replacing some of the older equipment and taking them to smaller airports. That will be done over a period of time."

"Older equipment?" The backscatter machines, which only came online beginning in 2009, are supposed to be state-of-the-art.

"Strategically?" Wouldn't you like to know what this term is supposed to mean? Like, what's the strategy?

This sounds an awful lot like the TSA's way of reducing a known health threat while allowing itself an "out" by saying, in essence, "Hey, we never said they were dangerous...in fact, we're still using them."

Why do they have to be backscatter machines?

Granted, the agency does still utilize them in 25 of the nation's busiest airports (though the agency won't confirm which ones, according to ProPublica).

And, in late September, the TSA awarded three U.S. companies contracts that could potentially be worth as much as $245 million to develop the next generation of scanners; one design by American Science & Engineering uses backscatter technology.

But there are other, safer machines out there that are more than capable of screening passengers. One type utilizes millimeter-wave scanning technology, which emits less radiation and is far less invasive while still incredibly effective at finding objects on passengers.

Some scientists can't figure out why the TSA won't use this viable alternative.

"Why would we want to put ourselves in this uncertain situation where potentially we're going to have some cancer cases?" David Brenner, director of Columbia University's Center for Radiological Research, told ProPublica last year. "It makes me think, really, why we don't use millimeter waves when we don't have so much uncertainty."

We agree.

One final note: If they're so safe, why doesn't the TSA allow some independent, non-affiliated third party test the safety of the backscatter x-ray machines?

Sources:

http://www.propublica.org

http://www.suntimes.com

http://newyork.cbslocal.com

Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.