winners

Scientific fact: Nobel prize winners eat more chocolate

Saturday, October 13, 2012 by: PF Louis
Tags: Nobel Prize, winners, chocolate

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
CDC issues flu vaccine apology: this year's vaccine doesn't work!
The five biggest lies about Ebola being pushed by government and mass media
Why does the CDC own a patent on Ebola 'invention?'
Ultraviolet light robot kills Ebola in two minutes; why doesn't every hospital have one of these?
Tetanus vaccines found spiked with sterilization chemical to carry out race-based genocide against Africans
Oregon man serving prison sentence for collecting rainwater on his own property
Russia taking McDonald's to court, threatens countrywide shutdown
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
The best way to help your body protect itself against Ebola (or any virus or bacteria)
Healthy 12-year-old girl dies shortly after receiving HPV vaccine
Ebola outbreak may already be uncontrollable; Monsanto invests in Ebola treatment drug company as pandemic spreads
HOAX confirmed: Michelle Obama 'GMOs for children' campaign a parody of modern agricultural politics
Ben & Jerry's switches to non-GMO, Fair Trade ice cream ingredients
W.H.O. contradicts CDC, admits Ebola can spread via coughing, sneezing and by touching contaminated surfaces
BREAKING: CDC whistleblower confesses to MMR vaccine research fraud in historic public statement
Monsanto's seed imperialism halted in Canada thanks to massive protests
Cannabis dissolves cancerous tumor in young infant, deemed a 'miracle baby' by physician
Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself from an uncontrolled Ebola outbreak

Delicious
(NaturalNews) Imagine a scientist receiving the Nobel prize with a dark chocolate bar held behind his or her back while acknowledging associates, family, and thanking the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences panel for bestowing the honor.

Then the chocolate bar is brought up and munched on with a smile. Later, the scientist praises chocolate as the source of inspiration and brilliance behind his or her inspiration.

Okay, that was a bit of absurd imaginative hyperbole based on an actual study by Dr. Franz Messerli, of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital and Columbia University in New York. It was actually published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

It was published as a "note" on the journal's online edition, not a peer reviewed report. Ironically, though absurd, it's not the worst or most biased study that has been reported in this and other medical journals.

Dr. Messerli is convinced that the flavonals of dark chocolate, as well as in red wine and green tea, inhibit cognitive decline while aging. He has a point, of course.

But instead of surveying last year's Nobel prize winners individually to determine who ate how much chocolate annually, he obtained data from 23 chocolate companies on national chocolate sales.

Then he compared the amounts of Nobel prize winners from each nation to the amount of chocolate consumption per capita. He considered this a factor in determining a nation's cognitive function. Very scientific, huh?

Interestingly though, the nation with the highest per capita chocolate consumption, Switzerland, also had the highest number of Nobel prize winners. The USA, Netherlands, Belgium, France, and Germany were bunched in the middle, while China and Japan were at the bottom.

The only anomaly within the context of this silly study was Sweden itself. They had 32 Nobel prize winners but their per capita chocolate consumption was indicative of only 14 prize winners. Dr. Messerli assumed this was at least partially due to Sweden's patriotic bias.

While it's true that dark chocolate has very high ORAC (oxygen radical absorption capacity) value as a leading antioxidant, with pure cacao the highest ORAC of all foods, Dr. Messerli's methodology for making this report is nothing more than a clever prank.

Ironically, it's more honest than many studies by pharmaceutical companies that throw out negative studies for their self-researched products and submit only what benefits their bottom line. Yet those often do get published.

Mark Sircus posted an interesting video on one of his recent newsletters. It's a TED talk (TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design) by a vigilant, ethical doctor who eloquently and passionately details the whole lamentable corrupt practice of Big Pharma passing on lies to doctors, the media, and patients.

Here it is - http://blog.imva.info

Sources for this article include:

http://www.usatoday.com

http://blog.imva.info/

Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.