winners

Scientific fact: Nobel prize winners eat more chocolate

Saturday, October 13, 2012 by: PF Louis
Tags: Nobel Prize, winners, chocolate

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
White House admits staging fake vaccination operation to gather DNA from the public
EXCLUSIVE: Natural News tests flu vaccine for heavy metals, finds 25,000 times higher mercury level than EPA limit for water
Irrefutable proof we are all being sprayed with poison: 571 tons of toxic lead 'chemtrailed' into America's skies every year
Truvia sweetener a powerful pesticide; scientists shocked as fruit flies die in less than a week from eating GMO-derived erythritol
Russia taking McDonald's to court, threatens countrywide shutdown
Why does the CDC own a patent on Ebola 'invention?'
Senator who attacked Doctor Oz over dietary supplements received over $146,000 in campaign contributions from Big Pharma mega-retailer and Monsanto
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
Oregon man serving prison sentence for collecting rainwater on his own property
HOAX confirmed: Michelle Obama 'GMOs for children' campaign a parody of modern agricultural politics
U.S. treating meat with ammonia, bleach and antibiotics to kill the '24-hour sickness'
Ebola outbreak may already be uncontrollable; Monsanto invests in Ebola treatment drug company as pandemic spreads
Ben & Jerry's switches to non-GMO, Fair Trade ice cream ingredients
Diet soda, aspartame linked to premature deaths in women
Elliot Rodger, like nearly all young killers, was taking psychiatric drugs (Xanax)
Right to farm being stripped from Americans: Michigan to criminalize small family farms with chickens, goats, honey bees and more
BREAKING: CDC whistleblower confesses to MMR vaccine research fraud in historic public statement
Monsanto's seed imperialism halted in Canada thanks to massive protests
Delicious
(NaturalNews) Imagine a scientist receiving the Nobel prize with a dark chocolate bar held behind his or her back while acknowledging associates, family, and thanking the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences panel for bestowing the honor.

Then the chocolate bar is brought up and munched on with a smile. Later, the scientist praises chocolate as the source of inspiration and brilliance behind his or her inspiration.

Okay, that was a bit of absurd imaginative hyperbole based on an actual study by Dr. Franz Messerli, of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital and Columbia University in New York. It was actually published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

It was published as a "note" on the journal's online edition, not a peer reviewed report. Ironically, though absurd, it's not the worst or most biased study that has been reported in this and other medical journals.

Dr. Messerli is convinced that the flavonals of dark chocolate, as well as in red wine and green tea, inhibit cognitive decline while aging. He has a point, of course.

But instead of surveying last year's Nobel prize winners individually to determine who ate how much chocolate annually, he obtained data from 23 chocolate companies on national chocolate sales.

Then he compared the amounts of Nobel prize winners from each nation to the amount of chocolate consumption per capita. He considered this a factor in determining a nation's cognitive function. Very scientific, huh?

Interestingly though, the nation with the highest per capita chocolate consumption, Switzerland, also had the highest number of Nobel prize winners. The USA, Netherlands, Belgium, France, and Germany were bunched in the middle, while China and Japan were at the bottom.

The only anomaly within the context of this silly study was Sweden itself. They had 32 Nobel prize winners but their per capita chocolate consumption was indicative of only 14 prize winners. Dr. Messerli assumed this was at least partially due to Sweden's patriotic bias.

While it's true that dark chocolate has very high ORAC (oxygen radical absorption capacity) value as a leading antioxidant, with pure cacao the highest ORAC of all foods, Dr. Messerli's methodology for making this report is nothing more than a clever prank.

Ironically, it's more honest than many studies by pharmaceutical companies that throw out negative studies for their self-researched products and submit only what benefits their bottom line. Yet those often do get published.

Mark Sircus posted an interesting video on one of his recent newsletters. It's a TED talk (TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design) by a vigilant, ethical doctor who eloquently and passionately details the whole lamentable corrupt practice of Big Pharma passing on lies to doctors, the media, and patients.

Here it is - http://blog.imva.info

Sources for this article include:

http://www.usatoday.com

http://blog.imva.info/

Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.